05 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWas it an example of you being " joyful and skipping about gleefully" when you said this to me: "You should be more careful how you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children"?
This is the reason that I am joyful and skip about gleefully whereas you appear to me to be stomping about full of resentment and quite miserable.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29192
Originally posted by FMFNice try. - However, that post by Robbie immediately followed your own post:
On this thread, robbie said this: [b]"You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children". I did not raise the fact that this internet site allows children - robbie did. I did not raise the issue of the way I conduct myself - robbie did. I did not suggest that the way I conduct myself is in any way a threat to children - robbie did. I did not suggest that I should "be more careful" - robbie did. 🙂[/b]
'With me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. I think it's what he calls "jocular".
Without this post by yourself, Robbie's post wouldn't have followed. - This is why I asked what was to be gained by you resurrecting the issue? Of course Robbie was going to respond the way he did.
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by FMFThat my legendary troll friend was a piece of sound advice for innocence itself is no safeguard against accusation.
Was it an example of you being " joyful and skipping about gleefully" when you said this to me: "You should be more careful how you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children"?
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI was responding to one of his posts that yet again was trying to introduce a form of sexual taunting into his banter. It's his modus operandi. I was commenting on that.
Nice try. - However, that post by Robbie immediately followed your own post:
'With me in the past, when his pants were at his ankles (and put there by himself) on more than one occasion, he's taken to asking me if I was sexually abused as a child, insinuated that I was a pedophile, and attributed my criticism of him to my supposed homosexuality. ...[text shortened]... o be gained by you resurrecting the issue? Of course Robbie was going to respond the way he did.
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeDespite a moderator facilitated mock apology at the time, robbie brings this accusation up time and time and time again; you are well aware of this and have even called him on it yourself if I remember correctly. So I don't understand why you are suddenly attempting to make him out to be the injured party - unless of course you have some other agenda you are massaging... 😉
Of course Robbie was going to respond the way he did.
Originally posted by divegeesterActually as has been pointed out to you numerous times it was FMF who raised it. Its FMF who always raises it. Why you have difficulty assimilating this reality is known only to you, perhaps you need specialist help? Furthermore you were asked to substantiate your now false claim of 'time and again, constantly, with great frequency' etc etc and could not do so. Your hollow words are nothing more than the sound of a large and empty vessel being beaten. You are a snivelling whingebag, page after page of your dreary whining. My goodness you must be miserable.
Despite a moderator facilitated mock apology at the time, robbie brings this accusation up time and time and time again; you are well aware of this and have even called him on it yourself if I remember correctly. So I don't understand why you are suddenly attempting to make him out to be the injured party - unless of course you have some other agenda you are massaging... 😉
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29192
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeesterYou've played the 'secret agenda card' before sir when we were not on the same page. Are you building me up to be the next Bond? 😛
Despite a moderator facilitated mock apology at the time, robbie brings this accusation up time and time and time again; you are well aware of this and have even called him on it yourself if I remember correctly. So I don't understand why you are suddenly attempting to make him out to be the injured party - unless of course you have some other agenda you are massaging... 😉
Robbie is no injured party, (Though clearly suffered a blow to the head at some stage in his life). You were simply mistaken when you said Robbie raised the topic in this thread. He didn't. End of story. I probably did pull him up on it in an earlier thread. But we were not talking about earlier threads. We were talking about this one. - Here FMF brought up the accusation,........Perhaps he has a secret agenda, hey?