04 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell there we are then. You won't promise not to bring it up again so I'm calling you on being a vicious little weasel who throws horrible. unsubstantiated insinuations at other RHP members. Took a long time to get there, but there it is.
Sorry dude, my offer is on the table, take it and feel easy.
Originally posted by divegeestertee hee, lighten up dude, you're a miserable old poker faced killjoy 😀
Well there we are then. You won't promise not to bring it up again so I'm calling you on being a vicious little weasel who throws horrible. unsubstantiated insinuations at other RHP members. Took a long time to get there, but there it is.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeBecause, having apologized, robbie then got annoyed about something about a week later and brought it up again, and he has done so repeatedly ever since. If he'd apologized and he'd meant it, that would have been the end of it. But he can't help himself. It's one of his favourite bits of 'banter" and, as you know, he likes to repeat his "jokes" over and over and over again.
He apologized,why not just let it go?
What's the point exactly in dredging it up in yet another thread? (Like you've done here with the earlier post. - 'With me in the past...' ). Clearly those things are not true about you. Why would you want them resurrected?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeesterActually, out of the two of us, it appears I was the only one who 'read around the thread before moralising.'
Because Robbie keeps bringing it up, again and again and again. It is a revolting insinuation and you really should read around the thread before moralising.
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeIt's a reminder of robbie's modus operandi. On this thread robbie was trying to characterize divegeester's criticism of him as being linked in some way to divegeester's supposed homosexuality, something robbie has flung out there umpteen times before, and which he has flung at me umpteen times before, just as he has tried to characterize - in my case - disagreement with him as being perhaps caused by me being sexually abused as a child, and just as he has used insinuations about me being a pedophile to distract from disagreements he was having with me in which he was not faring well. Slurs about sexual orientation, about being sexually abused, about being a pedophile. This is all part of robbie's modus operandi. I was reminding him of that as he trotted out stuff about homoeroticism for the umpteenth time. 😉
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeOn this thread, robbie said this: "You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children". I did not raise the fact that this internet site allows children - robbie did. I did not raise the issue of the way I conduct myself - robbie did. I did not suggest that the way I conduct myself is in any way a threat to children - robbie did. I did not suggest that I should "be more careful" - robbie did. 🙂
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeIts most interesting. What FMF does with varying degrees of success is attempt to dredge elements up from the past and to use them as a catalyst to discredit, vilify, gain moral leverage over other users. The term is retrospective trolling. In this instance he was playing for high stakes because accusations of paedophilia are quite serious. However I simply called his bluff and he had nothing but a pair of duces and a joker named divegeester as effectual as a man down. Why was he lost? because he repeatedly brings matters up as is his MO when others are perfectly willing to let it go and may even have apologised! FMF cannot let it go as you have witnessed and harbours it like a grudge for the rest of his days making him miserable and a killjoy.
Actually, out of the two of us, it appears I was the only one who 'read around the thread before moralising.'
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you feel there are things "from the past" that you said that "discredit" you?
What FMF does with varying degrees of success is attempt to dredge elements up from the past and to use them as a catalyst to discredit, vilify, gain moral leverage over other users.
Originally posted by FMFI feel that you are miserable and a killjoy because you won't let go and it builds up resentment in you. As for me, I am fully cognizant of the fact that as a human being I am prone to aberration and will inevitably make mistakes and thus I don't beat myself up over them and simply try to learn from the experience. This is the reason that I am joyful and skip about gleefully whereas you appear to me to be stomping about full of resentment and quite miserable.
Do you feel there are things "from the past" that you said that "discredit" you?
Originally posted by josephwWhy not send me another one of you cutting biblical scriptures while you are stomping across the earth hand in hand with God.... As you put it 😵
The more I read of divegeester, the more I hear FMF. Either they're one and the same, or they're PMing each other so much that divegeester is morphing.
05 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think it's quite amusing. You are increasingly trying to distance yourself from the miasma of your posting past, and FMF keeps..what is it you call it..."retrospectively trolling" you with snippets of vintage robbieisms. It's what makes coming here worthwhile 🙂
I feel that you are miserable and a killjoy because you won't let go and it builds up resentment in you. As for me, I am fully cognizant of the fact that as a human being I am prone to aberration and will inevitably make mistakes and thus I don't beat myself up over them and simply try to learn from the experience. This is the reason that I am joyf ...[text shortened]... gleefully whereas you appear to me to be stomping about full of resentment and quite miserable.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
Originally posted by FMF
On this thread, robbie said this: [b]"You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children". I did not raise the fact that this internet site allows children - robbie did. I did not raise the issue of the way I conduct myself - robbie did. I did not suggest that the way I conduct myself is in any way a threat to children - robbie did. I did not suggest that I should "be more careful" - robbie did. 🙂[/b]