07 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe words "false facade pretending to be something" are your words, not mine. You said them. I didn't say them. What do you mean by them
Its not a difficult question FMF. I have even given you the answers, all you need to do is type . . . . .good idea, not a good idea.
07 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI believe that a child abuser is more likely to abuse children - and to abuse children again and again - and to resume his abuse of children - if he knows that the corporation he's a member of is going to keep it secret.
Do you agree or disagree that a child abuser is more or less likely to come forward if they know that they will be reported due to mandatory reporting.
I think he's less likely to come forward and will just chance his arm, safe in the knowledge that the organization will keep it all confidential if he gets caught.
07 Sep 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell you keep bringing it up robbie. Again and again and again. Then you are forced to apologise by a moderator for conflating the sin of a 3a with child sexual abuse (gosh do you of all people here really want to open that can of awful JW worms??), then you bring it up again and again and again. You must feel there is something really bad in what FMF did - why don't you explain?
Sure after my dinner and an episode of Space1999, its dinner and Sci-fi time for me. See if you can reel your friend in he seems not a little delirious.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29220
07 Sep 16
Originally posted by divegeester@ divegeester
@ Ghost of a Duke.
How do you feel now about supporting robbie carrobie?
Support Robbie? You make him sound like a football club. Do you think i've been waving a scarf around with his name on it?
In this thread I have only supported the truth. Robbie called your initial post lame, something I thought was incorrect and duly pulled him up on. - It was then later claimed that Robbie had brought up the issue regarding FMF in this thread. I pointed out that FMF had actually brought up the issue himself. (Something you later accepted).
Nothing discussed since has dissuaded me from my position that resurrecting this topic served no purpose. Let sleeping dogs lie.
07 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI support Ghost of a Duke.
@ divegeester
Support Robbie? You make him sound like a football club. Do you think i've been waving a scarf around with his name on it?
In this thread I have only supported the truth. Robbie called your initial post lame, something I thought was incorrect and duly pulled him up on. - It was then later claimed that Robbie had brought up the is ...[text shortened]... uaded me from my position that resurrecting this topic served no purpose. Let sleeping dogs lie.
Originally posted by divegeesterOh dear it was your friend once again that raised the issue of insinuations that were made against him, not me. It seems that he simply cannot let it go despite that fact that he has engaged in similar behaviour himself. Behaviour which he has publicly stated is abnormal. Look how he cannot answer a simple question because to do so will incriminate him. If I was him I would let sleeping dogs lie but it seems he simply cannot get enough.
Well you keep bringing it up robbie. Again and again and again. Then you are forced to apologise by a moderator for conflating the sin of a 3a with child sexual abuse (gosh do you of all people here really want to open that can of awful JW worms??), then you bring it up again and again and again. You must feel there is something really bad in what FMF did - why don't you explain?