28 Oct 05
1 edit
Originally posted by KneverKnightYou know what reflects worse on child custody proceedings than bad history? Kidnapping your goddamn child.
I don't think you'll go to jail if it's like that.
Remain calm, impress the coppers with your reason and determination, don't make a scene.
Good luck.
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by dk3nnyThe words of the truly stupid. 🙄
Laws are there to be broken..
Go for it.
The person who steals your car
The person who mugs your granny
The person who rapes your wife
The person who murders your child
All breaking the law but hell what does that matter
Laws are there to be broken.. Go for it
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by XanthosNZMan you're a total dick, Ive read most of your posts and your always trying to go one better than the other person......
The law says you can.
Id say your problem is one of two things:-
1-Itsy bitsy teeny weeny willy ( no doubt your problem )
2-No mates......
Go and be insensitive else where!
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by nessyWhy the long board?
Man you're a total dick, Ive read most of your posts and your always trying to go one better than the other person......
Id say your problem is one of two things:-
1-Itsy bitsy teeny weeny willy ( no doubt your problem )
2-No mates......
Go and be insensitive else where!
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by KneverKnightThe question is whether the court will believe there is a clear and present danger. I have heard of cases where the father got custody because the mother was said to be "uncooperative" - i.e. she was not willing to let the father see the child because she knew he had abused it sexually. I understand mokko's feelings, but I would be very careful. Breaking the law could make things a lot worse.
In most cases, yes.
If there is a clear and present danger, no.
I can't tell from here though ...
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by NordlysHow come when I say this it's being mean but when you say it, it's not?
The question is whether the court will believe there is a clear and present danger. I have heard of cases where the father got custody because the mother was said to be "uncooperative" - i.e. she was not willing to let the father see the child because she knew he had abused it sexually. I understand mokko's feelings, but I would be very careful. Breaking the law could make things a lot worse.
Am I too abrasive?
PS. nessy, Hang ten ladyman
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by mokkoJust go and do what you think you need to do Mokko. It is clear from all your posts that I have read that you care deeply about your family and will do everything to keep them safe. Good luck and I, for one, hope that the law does the right thing. Until then you have to do what you think is right.
Well the law is wrong. The law doesn't know my or care about my child.
More power to you girl.
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by NordlysAnd him naming a convicted pedophile (his own boss) as an appropriate person to pick up our child doesn't warrant concern.
The question is whether the court will believe there is a clear and present danger. I have heard of cases where the father got custody because the mother was said to be "uncooperative" - i.e. she was not willing to let the father see the child because she knew he had abused it sexually. I understand mokko's feelings, but I would be very careful. Breaking the law could make things a lot worse.
He also has criminal charges against him right now for assault and death threats. He breached his bail conditions and is still walking free.
I'm not uncooperative at all and even offered more frequent 3 hour visit as opposed to 4 day out of town visits. If it was time with his daughter and their bond together that was important he would have benefitted more from this arrangement. But it's not about any of that.
His granny and pappy are paying all his legal fees and he needs to be the dutifull grandson and present her to them or else he gets threatened with being cut off from all financial aid from them. Again, not about what's best for this little baby.
I'm in such a panic as the clock keeps ticking.
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by GalaxyShieldWell they need to find me first to arrest me. I just need enough time so that he won't be able to take her. The father of my other two children is behind me 100% as well as his entire family. They will and have been there to help me out through this whole ordeal. I just simply can't understand how any mother can have her authority to protect her children removed from her and become a criminal as a result of the most basic of instints to protect their young.
Where's your baby going to go for the time that you're arrested?
28 Oct 05
Originally posted by mokkoMokko - I've been through two divorces with custodial issues in both .
Countdown begins........1 hour 15 minutes.
Trust me on this - If you openly defy the court they will crush you . They DO NOT LIKE THAT . If you're going through the system but need more time , then be creative and stall for time . You have an hour or so . Fine , go to your sister's , or the store , or some damned place like that . Leave a note on the door to the ex saying you've just run out to pick up some last minute things to make his visitation as comfy and wonderful for papa and baby as possible . When you get to the bogus destination - lose your keys , or disconnect the battery , or puncture your tire . And damn , wouldn't you know it you left your cell phone home . Get back 3 or 4 hours later , call your lawyer explaining "the regretable situation" , have him contact the ex or decide what to do from there . This gives you time and the appearance of cooperating with the court . It may be transparent as hell , but it gives you a plausable excuse . But do not openly defy them . It will go badly for you , and your children .