@suzianne saidYour brand of 'forum combat' ... is nothing but attacks on posters' character.
Your brand of 'forum combat', which @divegeester strives to copy, is nothing but attacks on posters' character. All for disagreeing with you.
This is not true. You are, so often, the epitome of what you rail against. Have you not read any of the debates there have been?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121323
30 Dec 23
@suzianne saidYou’re living in a dream world Susan.
Your brand of 'forum combat', which @divegeester strives to copy, is nothing but attacks on posters' character. All for disagreeing with you.
@divegeester saidOh, the irony.
You’re living in a dream world Susan.
You have been pushing your own fantastical narrative about me for the past year.
@fmf saidIf your take on me borders on the ridiculous, that is a matter for you, no one else. Your take on what is true is not true, not even a little bit. We all have our own motivations, and yours are completely in service to yourself, and as such, have little resemblance to the truth.
Your brand of 'forum combat' ... is nothing but attacks on posters' character.
This is not true. You are, so often, the epitome of what you rail against. Have you not read any of the debates there have been?
@fmf saidWith continuous denigration of those who disagree.
Participating as an ex-Christian proponent of agnostic atheist perspectives on such things as morality, identity, faith, and the human condition generally.
You only present what you want to present. You're not a fan of the whole truth, only the pieces which favor you.
@suzianne saidThanks for your analysis, but it doesn't change the fact that your characterization of my posting as "nothing but attacks on posters' character" is false.
If your take on me borders on the ridiculous, that is a matter for you, no one else. Your take on what is true is not true, not even a little bit. We all have our own motivations, and yours are completely in service to yourself, and as such, have little resemblance to the truth.
30 Dec 23
@suzianne saidWell I am a proponent of my own perspectives, that's true, and they are what I present ~ who else's perspectives am I supposed to present? To claim that I am, in any way, not interested in the truth, is a mischaracterization of my contributions.
You only present what you want to present. You're not a fan of the whole truth, only the pieces which favor you.
30 Dec 23
2 edits
@divegeester saidSo it’s still published? Now there’s nostalgia, can just see my dear old mum poring over it, love her. My friend gets the free weekly copy included in the Saturday Mail.
My wife still buys the 2 week edition at Christmas; she enjoys going through it with a highlighter pen marking out all the TV she wants to watch.
Not sure why I used pouring then changed it to poring, and now I’m not sure which it is? 🤔
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121323
30 Dec 23
@suzianne saidBut…
Oh, the irony.
You have been pushing your own fantastical narrative about me for the past year.
Thread 194565
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121323
30 Dec 23
@drewnogal saidMy bought “The Satelite Times” this year but I believe the famous Radio Times is still published.
So it’s still published? Now there’s nostalgia, can just see my dear old mum poring over it, love her. My friend gets the free weekly copy included in the Saturday Mail.
Not sure why I used pouring then changed it to poring, and now I’m not sure which it is? 🤔
@drewnogal saidIt is 'poring', so your change was right. 🙂
So it’s still published? Now there’s nostalgia, can just see my dear old mum poring over it, love her. My friend gets the free weekly copy included in the Saturday Mail.
Not sure why I used pouring then changed it to poring, and now I’m not sure which it is? 🤔
