- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by SeitseI can't understand why anyone would mock an illness or disease. That's sick.
I am not joking anymore, Rob. It is not funny. I pray that you never
have to suffer neither disease nor being ridiculed by it. Honestly. I
don't wish it for anybody, not even Bob.
I haven't seen it on here so I can't evaluate what happened. As I said before, Seitse, I'm so sorry you have felt mocked because of illness.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou do realise that everything about how you are posting suggests that you know you did exactly what is being described, but are too gutless to admit it and apologise?
“If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk ...[text shortened]... - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!”
―Rudyard Kipling, If: A Father's Advice to His Son
It would be a very easy matter to simply say that the claims being made are not true.
I imagine you hesitate because you do not want to lie outright. But I can't see the deception you appear to be currently engaged in, if that is what it is, is any better.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by Rank outsiderHow on earth do you draw that conclusion from the fact that Grampy Bobby posted Kipling's "If"?
You do realise that everything about how you are posting suggests that you know you did exactly what is being described, but are too gutless to admit it and apologise?
It would be a very easy matter to simply say that the claims being made are not true.
I imagine you hesitate because you do not want to lie outright. But I can't see the deception you appear to be currently engaged in, if that is what it is, is any better.
Originally posted by StartreaderI'm an English Literature graduate. It's what we do.
How on earth do you draw that conclusion from the fact that Grampy Bobby posted Kipling's "If"?
More seriously, rather like Duchess64 always intimating that he is is a woman, but not actually saying it, Grampy Bobby was refusing to answer a direct question about whether or not he had done what he was accused of by posting a poem that purports to portray him as the long-suffering innocent party.
Of course, if someone popped up with a screen-grab of the thread concerned, he could just subsequently claim that it was a reflection of some other perceived slight. Just as Duchess64 could claim that he never actually said he was a woman.
Either way, all the fluff that he can hurl will never change the fact that, as yet, he has not denied the accusation. Which are the actions more commonly associated with someone who knows they are guilty.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderWell said.
I'm an English Literature graduate. It's what we do.
More seriously, rather like Duchess64 always intimating that he is is a woman, but not actually saying it, Grampy Bobby was refusing to answer a direct question about whether or not he had done what he was accused of by posting a poem that purports to portray him as the long-suffering innocent pa ...[text shortened]... usation. Which are the actions more commonly associated with someone who knows they are guilty.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by Rank outsiderWhat happened to being innocent until you are proved guilty?
I'm an English Literature graduate. It's what we do.
More seriously, rather like Duchess64 always intimating that he is is a woman, but not actually saying it, Grampy Bobby was refusing to answer a direct question about whether or not he had done what he was accused of by posting a poem that purports to portray him as the long-suffering innocent pa ...[text shortened]... usation. Which are the actions more commonly associated with someone who knows they are guilty.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe threads were removed as you very well know. Claiming they are no longer visible is not evidence that they never existed. I don't Grampy Bobby claiming that he didn't make all those "Peter Newman" posts.
Yeah but your belief in my word or otherwise is neither here nor there, the fact of the matter is you have been unable to procure a single iota of evidence in your attempts to vilify Bobs, references to mythical threads, two biased character witnesses, a dubious interpretation of the commonly held phrase, 'spiralling down'. Its just not gonna hold up ...[text shortened]... ruling on the length of his beard or the bushiness of his sideburns and deem them, unlawful. 😵
I find it astonishing that you can post in here pretending that you don't remember. Goodness knows when people think of you as a representative of what you call gods church on earth. Incredible.
05 Feb 16
Originally posted by Rank outsiderIf you or any other contributor to these public forums has a specific thread and page number reference which supports these allegations
I'm an English Literature graduate. It's what we do.
More seriously, rather like Duchess64 always intimating that he is is a woman, but not actually saying it, Grampy Bobby was refusing to answer a direct question about whether or not he had done what he was accused of by posting a poem that purports to portray him as the long-suffering innocent party ...[text shortened]... accusation. Which are the actions more commonly associated with someone who knows they are guilty.
[which are tantamount to violation of Red Hot Pawn Forum Guidelines and/or Terms of Service] then please post it here or Alert the posts
requesting that Russ himself review the allegations for a disciplinary warning or forum ban. By the way my own undergraduate degree
included a Liberal Arts Minor with a concentration in English Literature. Regards, Bob
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
05 Feb 16
Originally posted by divegeesterYet again a public sneer at Robbie's religion.
The threads were removed as you very well know. Claiming they are no longer visible is not evidence that they never existed. I don't Grampy Bobby claiming that he didn't make all those "Peter Newman" posts.
I find it astonishing that you can post in here pretending that you don't remember. Goodness knows when people think of you as a representative of what you call gods church on earth. Incredible.
Disgraceful.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by Rank outsiderOn one level, we're not.
Sorry, when did we enter a court of law?
On another level, widespread accusations of guilt with absolutely no proof offered save the "remembered" witness of two utterly untrustworthy contributors are in themselves unreliable. Anyone publicly accused in this way could be entitled to seek redress.
On a third level, Divegeester and especially FMF do their very best to act as though this is a court of law and they are the state-appointed prosecutors.
Although this is not an actual court of law it has all the elements of that unpleasant creature, a kangaroo court.
Sometimes known as a lynch mob.