20 Jul 05
4 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderA list was drawn up and then a silly voting process in which the forums were used to stage some kind of bizarre popularity contest took place and there were a lot of threads about who is and isn't suitable for the job of Game Mod, many of them containing implicit cheat accusations.
Say what??? Your knowledge of history is poor; the first Game Mod volunteer thread was started by Russ back in December asking for volunteers. No one was "nominated" so I fail to see what "frivolous approach" you are talkin ...[text shortened]... hat it was too small and members weren't replaced when they left.
There needn't be any other replies to this thread except questions as to the criteria set and even those would be better sent as PMs.
20 Jul 05
Originally posted by ExyGauging what the members of the RHP community think might be "silly" to you, but I thought it was a good idea although the results of the vote were pretty much ignored. A discussion of people's qualifications is a good thing since they are going to have a certain degree of responsibility and authority over other members. If you had your way, NO important subjects regarding RHP would actually be dealt with in the Forums. That would be pretty boring, don't ya think?
A list was drawn up and then a silly voting process in which the forums were used to stage some kind of bizarre popularity contest took place and there were a lot of threads about who is and isn't suitable for the job of Game Mod, many of them containing implicit cheat accusations.
There needn't be any other replies to this thread except questions as to the criteria set and even those would be better sent as PMs.
20 Jul 05
2 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderI just don't see what there is to "discuss", David Tebb has asked for volunteers, he's also stated clear and precise criteria and I'm sure that he and the existing Game Mods and Site Admins can gauge exactly which of them are best suitable.
A discussion of people's qualifications is a good thing since they are going to have a certain degree of responsibility and authority over other members. If you had your way, NO important subjects regarding RHP would actually be dealt with in the Forums. That would be pretty boring, don't ya think?
Actually, I find this circumlocution “pretty boring” and unnecessary and also I think it detracts from the seriousness and practicality of what is trying to be achieved here. I'll now butt out and leave you all to chew the cud indeterminately. 😕
20 Jul 05
1 edit
Originally posted by ExyI posted in the attempt to get him to put himself up. He has the right attributes. If you can't have a little fun at least don't get ignoble and jump peoples throats. Have you jumped down the throats of those wanting to nominate #1. No way is he moderate but I agree with his post that he should be a back room cheat alert or analyst he'd be ruthless and unbiased.
Nobody is asking anyone to nominate anybody?! The request was for volunteers and the correct method is contact via PM or Site Feedback to the relevant individuals. It's this frivolous approach that made a farce of the last attempt to get a decent Game Mod team together.
Good luck team.
20 Jul 05
Originally posted by Tirau DanI'll now butt out and leave you all to chew the cud indeterminately. 😕
I posted in the attempt to get him to put himself up. He has the right attributes. If you can't have a little fun at least don't get ignoble and jump peoples throats. Have you jumped down the throats of those wanting to nominate #1. No way is he moderate.
Good luck team.