Originally posted by divegeesterOnce again thank you; this reply coming from you is tantamount to an intentional public compliment.
Grampy Bobby, my "objective focus" is aimed directly at your pompous, over-weening hypocrisy.
Seems you've acquired FMF's penchant for the gratuitous use of site nicknames in your replies.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby to divegeesterThe post that your message above is in reply to is 38 days old and you'd already made a retort to the exact same message once back then. Why have you bumped it to the top of the thread list unprompted?
"Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective." (OP)
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120159
03 Nov 15
Originally posted by FMFWhen one has a penchant for bumping ones own threads, it is advisable to have a 'mark' to play against.
The post that your message above is in reply to is 38 days old and you'd already made a retort to the exact same message once back then. Why have you bumped it to the top of the thread list unprompted?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbymmm if i owned the site i would
[b]If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn
"If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn" what if any changes
would you make to its present policies governing:
1) "Subscriptions"
2) "Rating Tables"
3) "Forums"
4) "Clans"
5) "Clubs"
6) "Chess Blogs"
7) "Send Feedback"
8) "Site FAQ"
9) "Help Forum"
10) "Site Map"
11) "On Twitter"
12) "On Fa ...[text shortened]... future?
____________
Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective.[/b]
1] let cumputor cheats play with out hassle
2] close popular forums
3] let players sandbag
4] let players have multiple accounts, money talks
5] ignore pms when someone complains not even reply
ooops...seems like my ideas are already in use
03 Nov 15
Originally posted by divegeester^------------------------------------------------------------> Thread 165496
Are you retro-trolling Grampy bobby? 😉
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120159
03 Nov 15
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI'll take that as an avoidance of the question
^------------------------------------------------------------> Thread 165496
04 Nov 15
Originally posted by roma45Sorry Roma. Beat you to that one. I sent in a PM around 12 months ago suggesting all those 5 points. Such is my respect by the administrators that they were adopted immediately except for the popular forum one. After a bit of foot dragging and begging (on their part) I put my foot down and said it must go. So here we are.
mmm if i owned the site i would
1] let cumputor cheats play with out hassle
2] close popular forums
3] let players sandbag
4] let players have multiple accounts, money talks
5] ignore pms when someone complains not even reply
ooops...seems like my ideas are already in use