Go back
If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn...

If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn...

General

G

santa cruz, ca.

Joined
19 Jul 13
Moves
376505
Clock
04 Nov 15

I would allow one mulligan per player, per game

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
08 Nov 15

If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn (OP)

"If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn" what if any changes
would you make to its present policies governing:

1) "Subscriptions"
2) "Rating Tables"
3) "Forums"
4) "Clans"
5) "Clubs"

6) "Chess Blogs"
7) "Send Feedback"
8) "Site FAQ"
9) "Help Forum"
10) "Site Map"

11) "On Twitter"
12) "On Facebook"
13) "On Google"
14) "Contact"
15) "Terms of Service"

For the purpose of maximizing retention of present and attracting
new members now and for the foreseeable future?
____________

Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective."

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
08 Nov 15

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn (OP)

"If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn" what if any changes
would you make to its present policies governing:

1) "Subscriptions"
2) "Rating Tables"
3) "Forums"
4) "Clans"
5) "Clubs"

6) "Chess Blogs"
7) "Send Feedback"
8) "Site FAQ"
9) "Help Forum"
10) "Site Map"

11) "On Twitter"
12) " ...[text shortened]... future?
____________

Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective."[/b]
I would combine the Sports and Culture Forums with the General Forum ~ i.e. I'd close the Sports and Culture Forums down and then change the description of the General Forum so that the words Sports and Culture were included.

Kewpie
Felis Australis

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
389880
Clock
08 Nov 15

Originally posted by FMF
I would combine the Sports and Culture Forums with the General Forum ~ i.e. I'd close the Sports and Culture Forums down and then change the description of the General Forum so that the words Sports and Culture were included.
This is something I'm very much in favour of. Doesn't matter that not all of us are interested in either or both topics, the General Forum should cater for all tastes. The traditional excluded topics of politics and religion should IMHO have their own forums, but other topics should all be in the one place where everyone can see them.

It would be good if people chose their thread titles carefully, but at least most of them do most of the time. 🙂

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
08 Nov 15

Originally posted by Kewpie
This is something I'm very much in favour of. Doesn't matter that not all of us are interested in either or both topics, the General Forum should cater for all tastes. The traditional excluded topics of politics and religion should IMHO have their own forums, but other topics should all be in the one place where everyone can see them.

It would be good if people chose their thread titles carefully, but at least most of them do most of the time. 🙂
Kewpie and FMF, my thanks to you both for your well reasoned and innovative suggestions.

HandyAndy
Read a book!

Joined
23 Sep 06
Moves
18677
Clock
08 Nov 15
1 edit

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Kewpie and FMF, my thanks to you both for your well reasoned and innovative suggestions.
I agree with the sentiment, but going back to what we had before is hardly innovative. Unless you have a poor memory.

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn (OP)

"If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn" what if any changes
would you make to its present policies governing:

1) "Subscriptions"
2) "Rating Tables"
3) "Forums"
4) "Clans"
5) "Clubs"

6) "Chess Blogs"
7) "Send Feedback"
8) "Site FAQ"
9) "Help Forum"
10) "Site Map"

11) "On Twitter"
12) "On ...[text shortened]... ble future?
____________

Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective."
Another concept I'd consider would be a revision of the Forum Guidelines which would incorporate minimal expectations of civility.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Another concept I'd consider would be a revision of the Forum Guidelines which would incorporate minimal expectations of civility.
Your "expectations" presumably?

How many times have you not met your own "minimal expectations of civility" in the last, say, six months?

Kewpie
Felis Australis

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
389880
Clock
09 Nov 15

{following the thread title}
...... I'd disable the "copy" and "paste" functions from all forums.
...... I'd separate the information forums (Announcements, Site Ideas, Help) from the entertainment forums.
...... I'd publish the usernames of forum-banned people somewhere on the site not directly in the forum area.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Kewpie
I'd disable the "copy" and "paste" functions from all forums.
This might make it necessary for some people to try a bit harder to bring a bit of originality to the community but I think it would have a positive effect and the benefit would be felt almost immediately.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37315
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by FMF
I would combine the Sports and Culture Forums with the General Forum ~ i.e. I'd close the Sports and Culture Forums down and then change the description of the General Forum so that the words Sports and Culture were included.
We've heard this crap idea from you before.

It's a good thing you're not "in control" here. How much would remain after gutting the site, removing everything you don't like?

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37315
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Kewpie
This is something I'm very much in favour of. Doesn't matter that not all of us are interested in either or both topics, the General Forum should cater for all tastes. The traditional excluded topics of politics and religion should IMHO have their own forums, but other topics should all be in the one place where everyone can see them.

It would be good if people chose their thread titles carefully, but at least most of them do most of the time. 🙂
Everyone can see them just fine where they are.

Again, this is just removing forums others enjoy, just because you don't use them.

Choice is a good thing, not something to be afraid of, or denied to others.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Suzianne
We've heard this crap idea from you before.
What's wrong with the idea? The two forums I mentioned are relatively moribund and the wider range of topics that would be raised here might breathe additional life into the General Forum. What would be your specific objection?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
09 Nov 15

Originally posted by Suzianne
Choice is a good thing, not something to be afraid of, or denied to others.
The choices would not be denied or reduced; they would still be here but in one place., Indeed, if it served to rekindle interest in 'Culture' and 'Sports' topics it could just as easily result in an increased choice of topics to talk about.

Kewpie
Felis Australis

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
389880
Clock
09 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Everyone can see them just fine where they are.

Again, this is just removing forums others enjoy, just because you don't use them.

Choice is a good thing, not something to be afraid of, or denied to others.
You're as entitled to your opinion as I am to mine. Unless you are the ultimate owner of the site it's all academic anyway.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.