"Internet Trolls..."

Originally posted by FMF
redbadger admitted that'd he'd engaged in 'gay bashing'. And you say "I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done"

If a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd raped children, would your stance be that you knew nothing about what that fellow JW had done to children?

the Gay bashing was I joke numb nuts I am Gay.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If that's what you want to believe dude that's up to you, personally I don't believe anything you say and I don't know anyone that does. Its just drool, copious amounts of slobbery drool.

So are you saying that your "position" as laid out on this thread and on the thread at SF is not a completely sarcastic one?

Originally posted by redbadger
the Gay bashing was I joke numb nuts I am Gay.

The issue remains the same: robbie cannot bring himself to condemn 'gay bashing'.

Originally posted by redbadger
the Gay bashing was I joke numb nuts I am Gay.

oh dear, the apparent subtlety of your humour evaded the Sado masochist Windy scourgebag FMF and his flunky sidekick Droogjeester and here they were condemning you for actions which were not even real, perhaps if they were less assuming and more understanding it might help. I'd say thats back of the net, nice toast sweet cheeks and nom nom nom all rolled into one luscious, shad-up-o-yah-face-yo-so-busted. FMF pants down again, droogjeester pants also down again.

Originally posted by FMF
The issue remains the same: robbie cannot bring himself to condemn 'gay bashing'.

the issue does not remain the same Badger was merely joking, if you have evidence of alleged gay bashing then produce it now and I will consider the facts.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the issue does not remain the same Badger was merely joking, if you have evidence of alleged gay bashing then produce it now and I will consider the facts.

If you condemn violence against homosexuals perpetrated because they are homosexuals, just say so.

Originally posted by FMF
If you condemn violence against homosexuals perpetrated because they are homosexuals, just say so.

produce the evidence and I will consider it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
produce the evidence and I will consider it.

If someone confessed to it, for example.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Another silly and transparent ad hominem and logical fallacy, I have not stated that I do not care and I resent your slanderous attempts say that I have. You might believe your own propaganda but you cannot expect any other logical and sentient being to also accept it, seriously, its just drool.

If a fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?

Originally posted by FMF
If someone confessed to it, for example.

you have knowledge of a confession that you would like me to consider? are you confessing up to it yourself, did you take a swipe at someone in 1978? did you dude?

Originally posted by FMF
If a fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?

I would seek to gather the facts before i condemned anyone, do you not think it prudent to gather facts before you condemn someone?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I would seek to gather the facts before i condemned anyone, do you not think it prudent to gather facts before you condemn someone?

It would not be enough for you if the child molester told you he'd done it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have knowledge of a confession that you would like me to consider? are you confessing up to it yourself, did you take a swipe at someone in 1978? did you dude?

So a perpetrator revealing to you that he had assaulted homosexuals would not be enough evidence for you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I would seek to gather the facts before i condemned anyone, do you not think it prudent to gather facts before you condemn someone?

Would you continue to allow him access to your children while you "gathered facts"?

Originally posted by FMF
It would not be enough for you if the child molester told you he'd done it?

It would certainly be compelling but one would still need as far as is possible to attempt to corroborate the evidence for example by interviewing the minors involved as far as possible.