13 Sep 15
Originally posted by divegeesterwhy am i reluctant? have i not explained at length why am i reluctant, have you even been reading what i have been writing?
Why do you keep saying this; it really isn't very becoming to see you pretending that redbadger hasn't admitted point blank to bashing gays. Why are you so reluctant to condemn his actions?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120908
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSeeing you hem and haw as you repeatedly squirm away from taking a principled stance in this matter is quite fascinating.
if you are going to ask the same questions ad nauseam you are going to get the same answers ad nauseam, does that not make logical sense to you?
Originally posted by divegeesterTry reading my posts and you wont ask the same ludicrous questions again and again, who knows you may even come to an understanding of my perspective if you just attempt to let go of your own for a moment or two, but watch you don't float away.
Seeing you hem and haw as you repeatedly squirm away from taking a principled stance in this matter is quite fascinating.
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieredbadger admitted that'd he'd engaged in 'gay bashing'. And you say "I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done"
I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done and neither do you
If a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd raped children, would your stance be that you knew nothing about what that fellow JW had done to children?
Originally posted by FMFI seek to understand rather than condemn, i don't know anything about what red badger has allegedly done and i certainly don't know anything about your hypothetical mock up. I find the incessant regurgitation of the same questions tedious if I am honest. I have explained my position more than adequately for anyone to understand it, it is enough for me.
redbadger admitted that'd he'd engaged in 'gay bashing'. And you say "I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done"
If a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd raped children, would your stance be that you knew nothing about what that fellow JW had done to children?
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukehehe lucky you I gotta drive to Edinburgh to a children's hospital, I don't like Edinburgh and I don't like hospitals 🙁
Ah, a beautiful Sunday morning; no work to go to, pub lunch to look forward to, two Christians squabbling about cheese.
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo if a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd had sex with children, for all intents and purposes his secret would be safe with you because your stance would be that you "know absolutely nothing about" it?
i certainly don't know anything about your hypothetical mock up.
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut surely, your "position" as laid out on this thread and on the thread at SF is a completely sarcastic one that is not, in fact, your genuine stance, right?
I have explained my position more than adequately for anyone to understand it, it is enough for me.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120908
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeReligion has little to do with what is being discussed, obviously your beautiful Sunday morning was not disturbed sufficiently for you to bother to read the thread. 🙂
Ah, a beautiful Sunday morning; no work to go to, pub lunch to look forward to, two Christians squabbling about cheese.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120908
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI've read all of your posts on this subject and nowhere do you once condemn the practice of gay bashing and specifically not redbadger's acts of gay bashing.
Try reading my posts and you wont ask the same ludicrous questions again and again, who knows you may even come to an understanding of my perspective if you just attempt to let go of your own for a moment or two, but watch you don't float away.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOK, so you don't care about any homosexuals that redbadger has told us he assaulted. And you would not condemn a fellow JW if he told you he had mollested or raped other people's children. I think I see where you are coming from. So, let's ask you this: If your fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?
I seek to understand rather than condemn...
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFAnother silly and transparent ad hominem and logical fallacy, I have not stated that I do not care and I resent your slanderous attempts say that I have. You might believe your own propaganda but you cannot expect any other logical and sentient being to also accept it, seriously, its just drool.
OK, so you don't care about any homosexuals that redbadger has told us he assaulted. And you would not condemn a fellow JW if he told you he had mollested or raped other people's children. I think I see where you are coming from. So, let's ask you this: If your fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?
13 Sep 15
Originally posted by divegeesterI don't know anything about what Badger has allegedly done, sorry, ask someone that does.
I've read all of your posts on this subject and nowhere do you once condemn the practice of gay bashing and specifically not redbadger's acts of gay bashing.
Originally posted by FMFIf that's what you want to believe dude that's up to you, personally I don't believe anything you say and I don't know anyone that does. Its just drool, copious amounts of slobbery drool.
But surely, your "position" as laid out on this thread and on the thread at SF is a completely sarcastic one that is not, in fact, your genuine stance, right?