- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by divegeesterPage 120, sixth post from the top, Landisqueen's post at 05.06 GMT today gives evidence of one instance of your hypocrisy.
Can you explain where this hypocrisy is please? I don't think you understand what is going on in this thread.
The discerning reader will see many more throughout this thread and others.
But really, I shouldn't need to spoonfeed you; in fact your question was merely spurious, part of your contentious attitude.
In essence, you and FMF are nothing more than forum trolls, out to draw others into your webs and traps.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120176
Originally posted by FMFIt was some weeks ago during one of Landisqueen's emergent periods; I suggested that she fancied you. That sort of attraction which is expressed through bickering engagement hiding underlying fizz. I'm probably wrong but it was a passing thought at the time. The alleged hypocrisy is mine, I think, because Landisqueen says I don't like being accused of fancying you.
I must have missed this. Or I have forgotten about it. When did it happen? How was I hypocrite in all of this?
Of course she is a) wrong, as I don't mind at all [ darling 😛 ], and b) she is missing the point which is that you and I both picked up the homophobic elements of the jibe, not that the fancying per-se.**
**i know you get it, I'm just trying add some clarity for our more challenged co-posters.
Originally posted by StartreaderYou said that GHOST HUNTER was "totally correct" to claim I was "obviously" a "women hater". Talking of "trolls" and "trolling", I*'m curious: do you stand by this claim?
In essence, you and FMF are nothing more than forum trolls, out to draw others into your webs and traps.
30 Jan 16
Originally posted by divegeesterYou will note that she has taken great pains ~ by her careful wording throughout ~ not to disagree with or distance herself explicitly from all the 'homosexuality/boyfriend/true love' stuff contributed by robbie, GHOST HUNTER and Startreader yesterday.
Landisqueen170 is missing the point which is that you and I both picked up the homophobic elements of the jibe, not that the fancying per-se.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120176
Originally posted by StartreaderThat's not evidence of my hypocrisy you nit-wit, that is a post by Landisqueen accusing me of hyprocrisy. Hilarious!
Page 120, sixth post from the top, Landisqueen's post at 05.06 GMT today gives evidence of one instance of your hypocrisy.
Go look up "hearsay" in the dictionary and let's talk again.
Originally posted by divegeesterYour hypocrisy is blatant and universally acknowledged. Why do i get the feeling that you would make it as a TV evangelist?
It was some weeks ago during one of Landisqueen's emergent periods; I suggested that she fancied you. That sort of attraction which is expressed through bickering engagement hiding underlying fizz. I'm probably wrong but it was a passing thought at the time. The alleged hypocrisy is mine, I think, because Landisqueen says I don't like being accused of fa ...[text shortened]... .**
**i know you get it, I'm just trying add some clarity for our more challenged co-posters.
Originally posted by divegeesterIt most certainly is evidence of your hypocrisy. You have attempted to find a moral pretext against others when someone suggested that you have amorous feelings towards someone else of the same sex and you yourself were guilty of doing the very same thing. Now i don't know how far reality has to go before it makes any inroads to those almost unreachable recesses of your mind, but attempting to moralize over other people for doing what you yourself have done makes you a hypocrite.
That's not evidence of my hypocrisy you nit-wit, that is a post by Landisqueen accusing me of hyprocrisy. Hilarious!
Go look up "hearsay" in the dictionary and let's talk again.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou describe the world, not just the internet.
A problem with the internet is that it is made up of people with differing standards, morals and tolerances. If your tolerance for the opinions of others is so low that you get physically sick, perhaps you need to find another hobby.
I watch your posts and I see you talking about being upset about fighting in here. We have never spoken on the Internet and yet your first post to me is to tell me to go always because I'm upset about something someone said. Why should I not feel sick to my stomach about those things Grampy Bobby said? Why do you defend them? Why?