Memo

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your hypocrisy is blatant and universally acknowledged. Why do i get the feeling that you would make it as a TV evangelist?

On what basis do your claim is "universally acknowledged' to be true. I think you are entitled to your opinion, but why do you use the word "universally"?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your hypocrisy is blatant and universally acknowledged. Why do i get the feeling that you would make it as a TV evangelist?

When you say "universally acknowledged" do you mean globally, the entire internet, the entire RHP community, everyone in this thread, you and your bunch of clan-based intellectual delinquents, or just you and the voices in your head?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It most certainly is evidence of your hypocrisy. You have attempted to find a moral pretext against others when someone suggested that you have amorous feelings towards someone else of the same sex and you yourself were guilty of doing the very same thing. Now i don't know how far reality has to go before it makes any inroads to those almost unreach ...[text shortened]... pting to moralize over other people for doing what you yourself have done makes you a hypocrite.

No I haven't. You either don't understand what "hypocrisy" is, what "evidence" is, what the issue here is, or a combination of all three.

I take no issue whatsoever with someone asking me if I am sexually attracted to anyone.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your hypocrisy is blatant and universally acknowledged.

When you say "blatant" I take it you mean you actually have "evidence" and not just the post of one of your forum cronies?

Originally posted by FMF
Startreader, as a matter of interest, has divegeester said anything to you or to Landisqueen170 on the last few pages that you think should be deleted or that warrants him being banned from the forum? You have been quite vocal recently about him being banned and posts of his deleted.

BUMP for Startreader.

Originally posted by divegeester
When you say "blatant" I take it you mean you actually have "evidence" and not just the post of one of your forum cronies?

Gee dude its been a rough ride for you and your friends these last few pages. This is what happens when you continually moralize over other people. You gotta to be able to keep those standards yourself and when you don't, well they come back to bite you on the bottom.

I'm just trying add some clarity for our more challenged co-posters.[/b]

You got your work cut out with these haters dive.

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
You conveniently failed to indicate the tone of that I comment I made months ago. Hmmm...just an oversight I'm sure? 🙂 It was CLEARLY tongue and cheek...I don't even have to go back and check because I am 100% certain that I had a smiley at the end of it to illustrate my lighthearted mindset when I posted it. And you know this.

And so, this is an ...[text shortened]... shes to try and trivialize them or arrogantly question them as if they are automatically faulty.

wow FMF taken apart piece by piece. One would think the crazy fool would learn, but noooooooo!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
wow FMF taken apart piece by piece. One would think the crazy fool would learn, but noooooooo!

Did they close the Clans Forum again?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Gee dude its been a rough ride for you and your friends these last few pages.

We must be reading different threads 😕

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
wow FMF taken apart piece by piece. One would think the crazy fool would learn, but noooooooo!

How can you post this with any degree of personal integrity?

It's like you must say in your head: " if I pretend hard enough it will be true"

Originally posted by divegeester
I am careful of that. But thanks for the reminder.

Obliged. RHP does seen to have an abundance of Ghosts, Sons and Lemons.

Am reluctant to be drawn into the current conversation, but professionally speaking 'anti-gay' rhetoric tends to come from people who are uncomfortable in their own sexuality and are just projecting this uncertainty in their negative judgement of others.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Obliged. RHP does seen to have an abundance of Ghosts, Sons and Lemons.

Am reluctant to be drawn into the current conversation, but professionally speaking 'anti-gay' rhetoric tends to come from people who are uncomfortable in their own sexuality and are just projecting this uncertainty in their negative judgement of others.

In your professional opinion what do you make of divegeesters latent tendencies?

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Obliged. RHP does seen to have an abundance of Ghosts, Sons and Lemons.

Am reluctant to be drawn into the current conversation, but professionally speaking 'anti-gay' rhetoric tends to come from people who are uncomfortable in their own sexuality and are just projecting this uncertainty in their negative judgement of others.

In this case, do be sure to bear in mind that the only people mentioning anything gay or homosexual have been Divegeester and FMF.

You haven't been deceived by their ploy of word-twisting and telling everyone that we're anti-gay so many times that the unwary get deceived, have you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
In your professional opinion what do you make of divegeesters latent tendencies?

The not so latent tendency of Divegeester that I'm chiefly aware of is prevarication, presenting facts so mendaciously and in such a twisted fashion, alongside his mate's rather more skilled efforts towards the same end, that readers of this thread could conclude that black really is white.

Metaphorically speaking. Of course.