31 Jan 16
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERJust quoting this once again for the benefit of FMF, who has cured my agreement with this post as supposed evidence to back up his statement that I (supposedly" agreed with Ghost Hunter that he, FMF, is a misogynist.
so to sum up, it/s okay for dive to make comments towards women like "get in there" and "she fancies you" a totally sexist remark
after dives over the top post showing his admiration for FMF, i post "a bit early for valentines day"
i really must have hit a nerve by the over reaction, but that's what those two bullies specialise in.
they have posted o ...[text shortened]... kitchen"
homophobia, their current favourite word, the victim card when they have nothing left.
Ghost Hunter says many things in this post that I was agreeing with.
Typical of FMF to pick out one small thing and be making allusions to it more than a dozen pages later.
Originally posted by StartreaderI think you are one of the weakest contributors here because of the content of your posts and the things you say and the way you process disagreement. When you talk about how you find me one of the nastiest contributors here - or whatever it is you have said in the past - I don't ask you or (or need you) to explain. I know what you mean. And I know what the word nasty means, just as you know what the word "weak" means. 😉
Neither. I merely wonder why, asked why, and observe the reply.
Originally posted by FMFThat's a very subjective and inaccurate statement. You're really not on form today, are you. Feeble? I think you're looking in the mirror.
This is feeble. You are making a fool of yourself about whether or not you agreed with another poster's accusation of me being a "women hater" and you make a post like this. Feeble stuff.
Originally posted by StartreaderThe accusation of being a "women hater" is not a "small thing" ~ do you think it is? ~ and I made "allusions" to it immediately, in fact the very next post on page 123, not more than a dozen pages later, as you will see if you look.
Typical of FMF to pick out one small thing and be making allusions to it more than a dozen pages later.
Originally posted by FMFFloundering again. Never mind. You can't back it up. That's ok. Don't worry about it.
I think you are one of the weakest contributors here because of the content of your posts and the things you say and the way you process disagreement. When you talk about how you find me one of the nastiest contributors here - or whatever it is you have said in the past - I don't ask you or (or need you) to explain. I know what you mean. And I know what the word nasty means, just as you know what the word "weak" means. 😉
Originally posted by SeitseI feel a communication gap between us. Misunderstanding.
LOL. You're the one who brought it up again --in Bob style, i.e. veiled.
It's o.k. I am used to see these things with my patients. Don't worry.
I make a totally friendly comment and you react as if it's otherwise.
If you weren't talking about the poem I don't know what you were talking about.
Originally posted by Suzianne
Yes, I do. And I will go on record here as saying they are "non-issues".
Originally posted by Suzianne
You know, I've tolerated your narcissism and FMF's narcissism for quite a long time now. You both let all manner of heinous things go on on this site, like the attempts by Robbie and others to tear down the clan system at RHP without even mentioning them. And yet, when someone has the "audacity" or the "unmitigated GALL" to actually call you two out for your narcissism (there can be no other word for it), OR if they actually have the heinous bad taste to actually DISAGREE with one of you, OR someone defies your near-constant condemnation for merely copy-pasting material (because honestly, that's where it started), you go berzerk. And I don't mean just a little pissy "oh, mommy, GB said I was being selfish!!" I mean a full-on, all-out WAR on GB for his courage to stand up to you two schoolyard bullies. You've literally pulled out ALL the stops to attack him (and surprise, make yourselves out to be "courageous vanguards of the TRUTH" at the same time), and to get others to pile on to your sad little bandwagon. Even to the point of now enlisting mods to do the dirty work for you that you can't do yourselves (even though you guys tried like hell to get FMF onto the mod team to further your aims).
It's all in this thread. But no one (and I do mean NO one) will actually put themselves through the hell of reading this entire thread again in order to come up to speed on your vicious attacks on a subscribing member of RHP. You've been able to tell your own fantasy tales of what GB has been "up to", with no censure or let-up, and precious little defense put up by him, for quite literally, years. You've managed to pile on and pile on, adding to what you call "evidence" of his supposed "misdeeds". You both ascribe all manner of evil thoughts and deeds to GB, with no one naysaying your ludicrous claims, and so you've gotten away with it all this time, until now, GB has plenty of weak-minded enemies (because they haven't made up their own minds, they simply drink your 'kool-aid' ) who pile on whenever you guys start your next round of attacks.
This is just more "forum combat" from two hardened veterans of the forum wars. Nevermind that the rest of the site has moved away from the "glory days" of the forum wars. I'd even say that you guys don't really believe your own crap, that you're just in it "for the lulz", but I think it goes even deeper than that, and now I go back full-circle to the beginning of this post. For years, I've seen you two forum maniacs attack ANYone who displays the balls to disagree with you. First, FMF encountered it in the Debate Forum, and now he dares not show his face in there because he's become the Debate Forum Pariah for his attempted attacks on people in there. Then you both show up in the Spirituality Forum, where I've gone more than a few rounds with you both, especially when you attack me for the high crime of disagreeing with you. You both got some traction in there mainly because the Spirituality Forum has a smaller number of people than the Debates Forum, as well as a number of people who naturally disagree with me for my beliefs to begin with. And now here you are in the General Forum, gathering your "evidence" bit by bit, day by day, trying to get something done to/about GB for his unmentionable crime of copy-paste and holding beliefs that you personally do not agree with.
I've kept my silence in this thread mainly because you are two and I am only one and you both seem to eat, breathe and live on this forum, so taking you both on in here is probably foolhardy, especially once you get your warband of "kool-aid" drinkers to jump in.
And believe it or not, the only purpose I have with this post is to speak my mind, and not to fight endlessly with you both over it, because we all know what a quagmire that would turn into, and quite frankly, I have other things to do. I just wanted to get all this off my chest, once and for all, and maybe, just maybe, wake up a few people in the process.
I know you probably reckon you're kicking butts and taking names, or whatever it was your profile used to say, but to be perfectly frank with you, if I'd sat down to write a parody of one of your furious, paranoid, self-pitying diatribes, I'd have been pretty pleased if I'd written the text exactly as it appears above. 😉
Originally posted by FMFI'm just glad I get a mention 😀
[quote]Originally posted by Suzianne
You know, I've tolerated your narcissism and FMF's narcissism for quite a long time now. You both let all manner of heinous things go on on this site, like the attempts by Robbie and others to tear down the clan system at RHP without even mentioning them. And yet, when someone has the "audacity" or the "unmitigated ...[text shortened]... diatribes, I'd have been pretty pleased if I'd written the text exactly as it appears above. 😉
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy on earth does she think I somehow had something to do with letting you ~ and others ~ get away with your supposed "heinous" attempts "to tear down the clan system at RHP"? I don't even understand what you are said to have done, let alone think it was "heinous". There was a time when she would have got a ban for repeating an accusation of cheating once the web site had decided there was no merit in it.
I'm just glad I get a mention 😀
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI can fully see why you would want this thread closed; you must feel uncomfortable with how your supporters behave.
Saturday, January 30, 2016 (Page 134)
Notice:
Thanks for your 2,003 Replies during the past 44 days for an average of 45.5 replies
per day far exceeds the sole purpose of this thread which is now closed. ~GB
_________