Memo

Originally posted by divegeester
I can fully see why you would want this thread close; you must feel uncomfortable with how your supporters behave.

Well, cult leaders cannot always keep such a tight grip on the minions, you know.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Yes, I do.

And I will go on record here as saying they are "non-issues".

You know, I've tolerated your narcissism and FMF's narcissism for quite a long time now. You both let all manner of heinous things go on on this site, like the attempts by Robbie and others to tear down the clan system at RHP without even mentioning them. And yet, when someone ...[text shortened]... this off my chest, once and for all, and maybe, just maybe, wake up a few people in the process.

Almost every post you make is an "attack" (using your words) on someone whom you don't like. You should look at your own posting history suzianne. I don't object to you attacking me, it's absolutely fine; what I take issue with you over is your duplicity, hypocrisy and unprincipled partisan posting. Examples? -
How you overlook sonships fruit-loopery in the Spirituality forum, swallowing all that utter nonsense because you like him.
- your "passing over" Grampy Bobby's disgraceful comments about suicides, "because it is a part of his religious beliefs", and because you like him.

All this commentry about "veterans of the forum wars", what a load of nonsense. What on earth are you talking about, you seem to be ranting and deluded. What "forum wars" are you talking about? Have you been watching Star Wars late at night again or something? For as long as I've been here there have been spats and banter and rows and falling outs among all the other random stuff.

In the meantime please, feel free to alert any post I've made if you are uncomfortable with it.

Originally posted by FMF
Why on earth does she think I somehow had something to do with letting you ~ and others ~ get away with your supposed "heinous" attempts "to tear down the clan system at RHP"? I don't even understand what you are said to have done, let alone think it was "heinous". There was a time when she would have got a ban for repeating an accusation of cheating once the web site had decided there was no merit in it.

I think its the consequence of people looking at the world in purely moral terms, thus whatever you do and whatever I do is related in some moral sense. She has started her own clan the motivation seemingly being a kind moral crusade against elements she deems to be immoral or amoral.. Its motto being honesty. fairness. integrity.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Have some players changed sides?

It just makes me laugh to be accused of "narcissism" for not getting involved in a debate about chess, as if it's hypocritical to stand up to Grampy Bobby's brand of forum misanthropy but NOT to also stand up against something or other about something else I know nothing about and don't care about. Narcissism? NOT getting involved in Clan Forum bickering is a sign of narcissism?? What a hoot. She was in full half-baked-blurt mode. 😀

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I think its the consequence of people looking at the world in purely moral terms, thus whatever you do and whatever I do is related in some moral sense. She has started her own clan the motivation seemingly being a kind moral crusade against elements she deems to be immoral or amoral.. Its motto being honesty. fairness. integrity.

If you are cheating, which I think you are well capable of, then you should stop. As for the Clan news, spare me. Don't type that stuff for my benefit. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
If you are cheating, which I think you are well capable of, then you should stop. As for the Clan news, spare me. Don't type that stuff for my benefit. 😉

Ummm the clan stuff was included as an illustration not because I think you are interested. Also what you think I am capable of and what I have actually done are not one and the same thing. You asked a question and you got the answer it should be enough for you.

Originally posted by Startreader
Divegeester exposed as the idiot we knew he was anyway.

Ad hominems away!

Obviously I hit the mark a little earlier 😉

Originally posted by Startreader
Would you oblige me, please, by giving the page reference for that quotation? I remember saying I totally agreed with something Ghost Hunter had said, but my recollection is that it was in respect of something of divegeester's. Memory may be playing me false but no doubt you have chapter and verse at your fingertips. I don't.

You don't even know what you are attacking people for!

The post where you said you "agreed totally" with Ghost Hunter, I replied "good grief".

Get it now?!

Originally posted by FMF
I couldn't have said it in a more plain spoken and clear way.

😵

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Ummm the clan stuff was included as an illustration not because I think you are interested. Also what you think I am capable of and what I have actually done are not one and the same thing. You asked a question and you got the answer it should be enough for you.

I had a look at some of your posts - and those of others - on the Clans Forum a couple of times a year or so ago. You may post like a 16 year old here for the most part, but you posted like a 13 year old there. No. Quite right. Not interested. 😀

Originally posted by Startreader
...I make no accusations of misogyny.

...I merely observe.

...Yes, clearly Divegeester is a misogynist.

...That's evident.

...I don't "accuse" him of it.

[Abridged from your post]

Pure forum gold

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Also what you think I am capable of and what I have actually done are not one and the same thing.

Well I certainly wouldn't think or assume you were a cheat on the say so of a poster like Suzianne.

Originally posted by Startreader
Thank you for your page reference. I'll have a look at it later.

Sure, when you've got more time, to make the one click to go and look.

You asked for the the reference of when you agreed with ghost Hunter about FMF being a misogynist, why can't you own up to saying it?

Originally posted by divegeester
You asked for the the reference of when you agreed with ghost Hunter about FMF being a misogynist, why can't you own up to saying it?

I am pretty sure she still wants to be taken really, really seriously on the subject of "misogyny", though.

Originally posted by Startreader
Just quoting this once again for the benefit of FMF, who has cured my agreement with this post as supposed evidence to back up his statement that I (supposedly" agreed with Ghost Hunter that he, FMF, is a misogynist.

Ghost Hunter says many things in this post that I was agreeing with.

Typical of FMF to pick out one small thing and be making allusions to it more than a dozen pages later.

How is calling someone a misognist a small thing? If it's a small thing then why are you worried about it?

On page 135 you said you "totally agreed" with Ghost Hunter and now you are hemming and hawing, flapping and back paddling because you have either lied about it, or simply didn't take note of what you were "totally agreeing to".