Go back
Memo

Memo

General

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
What i actually had to type in my search engine was a compound of the quotation and the actual quote.
And while you were doing that you were also continuing to claim I had fabricated the 90% statistic? That seems a bit strange, no?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I explained how I'd reached the figure I'd quoted and listed all the sources. Why would you continue to claim I'd made the statistic up AFTER you'd seen that?
because you FAILED to provide a direct link to a quotation all you provided was a list of websites, Had you provided a direct link to the quotation you would not have been called out for lying. Why did you not provided a direct link to the quotation in question.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
And while you were doing that you were also continuing to claim I had fabricated the 90% statistic? That seems a bit strange, no?
Why did you not provide a direct link to the quotation? that seems much more strange.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
And while you were doing that you were also continuing to claim I had fabricated the 90% statistic? That seems a bit strange, no?
Yes tell us Effhim why could you not provide a direct link to your quotation? Tell us if you had provided a direct link would you have been accused of lying?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why did you not provide a direct link to the quotation? that seems much more strange.
'If in doubt, call someone a liar' is not a very funny or pleasant modus operandi, robbie.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes tell us Effhim why could you not provide a direct link to your quotation? Tell us if you had provided a direct link would you have been accused of lying?
But why were you accusing me of lying? It didn't make sense to be accusing me of lying.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
But why were you accusing me of lying? It didn't make sense to be accusing me of lying.
sorry effhim i fail to see where you answer the questions, here they are again,

why could you not provided a direct link to your quotation? had you provided a direct link would you have been accused of lying?

You could not provided a direct link because you were being accused of lying? Umm that doesnt even make sense. Infact its nonsense, being caused of anything does not prevent you from providing a direct link.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry effhim i fail to see where you answer the question, here it is again,

why could you not provided a direct link to your quotation? had you provided a direct link would you have been accused of lying?
So, what then? I was somehow at fault for making you accuse me of lying because I only cited my sources and did not give you direct links?

So you calling me a liar was my fault? Is that how it works?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
So, what then? I was somehow at fault for making you accuse me of lying because I only cited my sources and did not give you direct links?

So you calling me a liar was my fault? Is that how it works?
Yes you are to blame for your failure to provide a direct link, probably in full knowledge that you would be called out for being a liar so that you could be exonerated later after you managed to produce it. The deal was link or lie Effhim, you FAILED to produce a direct link and we had no choice but to call you out.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes you are to blame for your failure to provide a direct link, probably in full knowledge that you would be called out for being a liar so that you could be exonerated later after you managed to produce it.
So when I explained how I'd found the statistic and cited 7-8 reputable web sites/organizations, you thought to yourself I'll just continue to call him a liar, is that how it was?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The deal was link or lie Effhim, you FAILED to produce a direct link and we had no choice but to call you out.
You "had no choice" but to keep calling me a liar?

Joke or serious explanation?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
So when I explained how I'd found the statistic and cited 7-8 reputable web sites/organizations, you thought to yourself [b]I'll just continue to call him a liar, is that how it was?[/b]
It was link or lie Effhim! You failed to provide a direct link and we called you out, that's how it works.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It was link or lie Effhim! You failed to provide a direct link and we called you out, that's how it works.
And this kind of behaviour by you doesn't qualify as 'bullying'?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Feb 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
And this kind of behaviour by you doesn't qualify as 'bullying'?
In what universe is calling for corroborative evidence bullying?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
02 Feb 16

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
In what universe is calling for corroborative evidence bullying?
Calling someone a liar repeatedly and then claiming later that it was because you were too impatient to check the sources that had been cited is a pretty daft way for you to be carrying on.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.