Go back
Moon Landing 40 Years Today

Moon Landing 40 Years Today

General

B
Death

is no semi-colon

Joined
14 Dec 08
Moves
23029
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
a government funded programme can prove anything to be true.
ha! they didn't prove there were WMDs in Iraq!

😛

Kewpie
Felis Australis

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
390441
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

The source may be NASA, so to conspiracy theorists it's "well, they would say that, wouldn't they", but to me it's compelling evidence. And I watched the original event on live television, along with preliminary programs from our own local Tidbinbilla and Parkes tracking stations.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23Feb_2.htm

e
Black Mark

walking to and fro

Joined
02 Aug 05
Moves
39001
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

You are all missing the big picture... MONEY

In 1969,after "they" said we landed on the moon... 64 million extra dollars was then budgeted for the space program... I say it was well worth the state of the art imagery the space program invested in.

I also find in funny that in 40 years we cant get back to the moon to shoot another damn video... weird

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19223
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
as far as I know they are not government funded.If so that would change everything.
well, i watched a different programme, it wasn't government funded.

i can't remember everything in it but it presented a pretty good case for the hoaxing of the moon landings.

i would like to think they were real, it would be a real shame otherwise but nothing would surprise me with the us government.

utherpendragon

Hy-Brasil

Joined
24 Feb 09
Moves
175970
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
well, i watched a different programme, it wasn't government funded.

i can't remember everything in it but it presented a pretty good case for the hoaxing of the moon landings.

i would like to think they were real, it would be a real shame otherwise but nothing would surprise me with the us government.
i am referring to an american tv show called myth busters.they do scientific experiments to prove or bust urban myths. people write in ideas and want them put to the test.the moon landing was just one of these episodes. i dont think the show would have an ulterior motive one way or the other.

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19223
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
i am referring to an american tv show called myth busters.they do scientific experiments to prove or bust urban myths. people write in ideas and want them put to the test.the moon landing was just one of these episodes. i dont think the show would have an ulterior motive one way or the other.
then you're just not cynical enough.

AttilaTheHorn
Erro Ergo Sum

In the Green Room

Joined
09 Jul 07
Moves
527142
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
So you figure

"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind", was true?
That quote, although correctly quoted, was a mistake. He intended to say, "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind," but he left out that one important word. So what he actually said really makes no sense.

utherpendragon

Hy-Brasil

Joined
24 Feb 09
Moves
175970
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
ha! they didn't prove there were WMDs in Iraq!

😛
We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."
Santorum pointed out that during Wednesday's debate, several Senate Democrats said that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue.

z
Thread Killing Chimp

In your retina!:D

Joined
09 May 05
Moves
42859
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by epic0002
You are all missing the big picture... MONEY

In 1969,after "they" said we landed on the moon... 64 million extra dollars was then budgeted for the space program... I say it was well worth the state of the art imagery the space program invested in.

I also find in funny that in 40 years we cant get back to the moon to shoot another damn video... weird
We cant get back? Or just didnt yet? Maybe there are more interesting places in space to investigate first.

You are missing the big picture...MONEY.

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19223
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have rec ...[text shortened]... had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue.
🙄

you know i have enough chemicals in my house to make 'weapons of mass destruction', everyone does. quick call the feds.

rick santorum is a tool.

l

Milton Keynes, UK

Joined
28 Jul 04
Moves
81654
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I was teen at the time, and flag I saw was blowing for some time, with no one anywhere near it...It was long enough to ask the question how is that flag blowing?
It is simple physics, and ironically, it is the lack of air that causes it to wave for quite some time. Without air resistance (and therefore no damping) it will carry on waving until the all kinetic energy of the flag gets dissipated as heat.

It isn't blowing, just carrying on to wave (in a sinusoidal movement the same way a springy pole will) after the astronaut struggled to get it into the ground.

B
Death

is no semi-colon

Joined
14 Dec 08
Moves
23029
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lausey
It is simple physics, and ironically, it is the lack of air that causes it to wave for quite some time. Without air resistance (and therefore no damping) it will carry on waving until the all kinetic energy of the flag gets dissipated as heat.

It isn't blowing, just carrying on to wave (in a sinusoidal movement the same way a springy pole will) after the astronaut struggled to get it into the ground.
thank you. i said that on page one, but i don't think it penetrated. you expressed it very well.

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

a

THORNINYOURSIDE

Joined
04 Sep 04
Moves
245624
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by epic0002
I also find in funny that in 40 years we cant get back to the moon to shoot another damn video... weird
They did go back 10 years ago and made a new video. However, the VT editor was bored and edited out all the bits he had seen before.

This left nothing new and so the 30th anniverary tape was destroyed.

l

Milton Keynes, UK

Joined
28 Jul 04
Moves
81654
Clock
21 Jul 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Moon hoax conspiracy theorists never fail to entertain.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.