Go back
Notable death

Notable death

General

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I don't read any "major Chinese newspapers". So I'd have to Google it and think of the right words and Boolean operators to get fruitful hits from a search. However, I'm a bit busy at the moment.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I'd say those native Chinese speakers in your story are certainly entitled to their opinions. I think you are trying to engineer some sort of accusation [?] or conjure up some sort offence against you [?] or maybe against others [?], but you haven't hit the target yet. Keep trying if that's what you want to do.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21
1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I just think it's a notable death, that's all. I have made no claim along the lines of x is more notable than y, or a is less notable than b. You are trying too hard to be pugnacious. It isn't working.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I don't give two hoots what major Chinese newspapers have or haven't done. It doesn't affect this thread on this message board.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8730
Clock
28 May 21

@divegeester said
The spirit of this thread.

March 2017 - May 2021
Cause of death: flame war.

<sigh>

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121810
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
^^ @dj2becker seal of approval.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
@duchess64 said
Note that the arrogant Westerner FMF apparently agrees that the opinions of two other arrogant Westerners that they are speaking perfect Chinese must be at least as valid as the judgments of every Chinese native speaker that these Westerners are speaking gibberish.

See the thread entitled "Apparently".

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 May 21
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Where have I "argued" this? What "racism" am I supposedly "showing"? Against whom? You?

"FMF (showing his racism) apparently argues..."

There's that word again.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 May 21

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Note that the troll FMF prefers to support, of course, his fellow Westerners. So, if FMF has his own subjective opinion that he speaks perfect Chinese, then surely he must speak perfect Chinese, right? Even if no native speaker can understand FMF's gibberish, surely FMF must be perfectly qualified to act as a professional Chinese-English interpreter, right?

Blimey!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.