- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121810
28 May 21
@fmf saidSmell those burning transistors!
Note that the troll FMF prefers to support, of course, his fellow Westerners. So, if FMF has his own subjective opinion that he speaks perfect Chinese, then surely he must speak perfect Chinese, right? Even if no native speaker can understand FMF's gibberish, surely FMF must be perfectly qualified to act as a professional Chinese-English interpreter, right?
Blimey!
The post that was quoted here has been removedYou said I was "showing" my "racism"? Where?
This is what you said: "It's racist to believe that two white American *beginning* learners of ChineseKNOW BETTER than every Chinese native speaker that they are speaking perfect Chinese."
But I haven't said I believe this.
Where is it you think I have claimed to believe this?
You're making stuff up.
You're fabricating an accusation of racism out of thin air.
Does declaring it to be "dog whistle racism" mean you don't have to take any responsibility for making the accusation?
28 May 21
@divegeester saidYet another casualty of D64's obsession. We can only hope that Russ and our moderators do the right thing, to save these forums from extinction. Please, guys. There's a case for a lengthy ban for this non-subscriber who doesn't play chess on the site and is trying to drive away paying customers and decimate site advertising revenue.
The spirit of this thread.
March 2017 - May 2021
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27969
@kewpie saidOr apply the Bouncer Rule: eject all parties involved in the dispute, no matter who "started" it. 😉
Yet another casualty of D64's obsession. We can only hope that Russ and our moderators do the right thing, to save these forums from extinction. Please, guys. There's a case for a lengthy ban for this non-subscriber who doesn't play chess on the site and is trying to drive away paying customers and decimate site advertising revenue.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121810
28 May 21
@kevin-eleven saidIf one goes by the strategic thumbing going on early to support and encourage duchess64 in her behaviour, then one can only assume that the majority of those reading favoured her contributions.
Or apply the Bouncer Rule: eject all parties involved in the dispute, no matter who "started" it. 😉
There is no point in someone bleating about it after repeatedly thumbing her up in a sort of vicarious weasel-jab at FMF.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121810
@kewpie saidYou received two alerts for this post Kewpie.
Yet another casualty of D64's obsession. We can only hope that Russ and our moderators do the right thing, to save these forums from extinction. Please, guys. There's a case for a lengthy ban for this non-subscriber who doesn't play chess on the site and is trying to drive away paying customers and decimate site advertising revenue.
Presumably from the supporters of duchess64...their hero in taking on the terrible FMF.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 27969
@divegeester said"Presumably" -- hah!
You received two alerts for this post Kewpie.
Presumably from the supporters of duchess64...their hero in taking on the terrible FMF.
The Number Two always reminds me of you and FMF, or as they say in technical French, "la merde binaire".