Originally posted by Pawn QweenWell it all depends on the individual child. IMO 15 is a realistic age. Plenty of people have sex at 14 and 15 or even younger and are completly fine.
Why should the age be 15? In the UK the legal age is 16 and that is where the line should be drawn. If people think the last year doesn't matter, then what's the point of having a law?
But you have to draw the line somewhere.
Originally posted by Brother EdwinAnd this coming from someone with a profile like this?
Kill.
Only 19 and still more intellegent than you. Saying it like it isan't and thinking inside the box.
MSN me at es23505@yahoo.co.uk
This is the perfect girl. She would be worth the life secentence for rape.
&mode=related&search=
If you disagre with anything I say you are wrong.
Come on Ed, Are you just being inflammatory again? 😛
Originally posted by jimslyp69That was a metaphore to describe how attractive she is. Otherwise known as a joke.
And this coming from someone with a profile like this?
Only 19 and still more intellegent than you. Saying it like it isan't and thinking inside the box.
MSN me at es23505@yahoo.co.uk
This is the perfect girl. She would be worth the life secentence for rape.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IndOUUu_biE&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/w ...[text shortened]... e with anything I say you are wrong.
Come on Ed, Are you just being inflammatory again? 😛
Also just because you think a 14 year old is attractive does not mean you have a thing for children. I know some 13 year old girls who are more physicaly developed than some 18 year olds.
Paris Hilton for example is flat chested and has no arse. But people are not considerd pedophiles for likeing her.
Originally posted by Brother EdwinYes! Rape is a really hilarious subject isn't it!?
That was a metaphore to describe how attractive she is. Otherwise known as a joke.
Also just because you think a 14 year old is attractive does not mean you have a thing for children. I know some 13 year old girls who are more physicaly developed than some 18 year olds.
Paris Hilton for example is flat chested and has no arse. But people are not considerd pedophiles for likeing her.
Your second argument seems to contradict your initial stance of 'kill', too, in that you seem to be highligting the fine line between paedophilia and 'normal' sexual desire.
Carry on Antigone.
Originally posted by Brother EdwinCompletely fine? Poppycock. Sex is the leading cause of pregnancy. Pregnancy is the leading cause of parenthood. Anyone not old enough to be an adult parent isn't old enough to have sex.
Well it all depends on the individual child. IMO 15 is a realistic age. Plenty of people have sex at 14 and 15 or even younger and are completly fine.
But you have to draw the line somewhere.
Originally posted by Brother EdwinNo it doesn't depend on the individual child. The age of consent is 16. Physical development has no bearing on anything.
Well it all depends on the individual child. IMO 15 is a realistic age. Plenty of people have sex at 14 and 15 or even younger and are completly fine.
But you have to draw the line somewhere.
The line has been drawn and the age is 16. So if you are having those thoughts about a 15 year old, they are the thoughts of a paedophile. Act on those thoughts and you definately are one. What was that you wanted to happen to paedophiles?
Originally posted by Pawn QweenIn reality, those thoughts are completely normal. From a psychological perspective the majority of males fantasise at some stage in their life about sexual disorientation with a youngster, age irrelevant. Those are not paedophile thoughts as you assert. They are fantastical endeavors of the sexual mind, and perfectly normal as a part of self development, certainly during masturbation in early sexual activity. They are paedophile only if a plan is developed to act upon them, and unfortunately often carried out. However, I do agree that 16 is; set legally for a reason; has been for some time; is very unlikely to change; and in fact works very well for the majority of adolescents.
No it doesn't depend on the individual child. The age of consent is 16. Physical development has no bearing on anything.
Lots of people under 16 have sex, yes, and I was teaching them because they were unable to go to school and continue their education once they were pregnant!
The line has been drawn and the age is 16. So if you are having those tho ...[text shortened]... n those thoughts and you definately are one. What was that you wanted to happen to paedophiles?
Originally posted by mikelomwhat would you say if it was a 9 year old girl he was saying was attractive in his profile?
In reality, those thoughts are completely normal. From a psychological perspective the majority of males fantasise at some stage in their life about sexual disorientation with a youngster, age irrelevant. Those are not paedophile thoughts as you assert. They are fantastical endeavors of the sexual mind, and perfectly normal as a part of self development, cer ...[text shortened]... e time; is very unlikely to change; and in fact works very well for the majority of adolescents.
Originally posted by geniusI haven't read his profile. I have no intention of reading his profile.
what would you say if it was a 9 year old girl he was saying was attractive in his profile?
Children 'are' beautiful and attractive. I have three.
It depends upon the context of the reference to 'attractive'.
If you are referring to what I think you are, then I shall certainly not venture to read his profile!
Originally posted by Brother EdwinWelcome to my freaky perv list. Perv.
That was a metaphore to describe how attractive she is. Otherwise known as a joke.
Also just because you think a 14 year old is attractive does not mean you have a thing for children. I know some 13 year old girls who are more physicaly developed than some 18 year olds.
Paris Hilton for example is flat chested and has no arse. But people are not considerd pedophiles for likeing her.
Oops, looked at my list. You're on it twice now. Well done.
P-
Originally posted by mikelomjimslyp69 quoted it earlier. and it's not the good sort of attractive...
I haven't read his profile. I have no intention of reading his profile.
Children 'are' beautiful and attractive. I have three.
It depends upon the context of the reference to 'attractive'.
If you are referring to what I think you are, then I shall certainly not venture to read his profile!
Originally posted by geniusIf that's the best 'rehabilitation' can do, then I'll end up over there with the 'throw away the key' camp after all. It's not good enough. One repeat offense by a person we've convicted and locked up already is one too many.
but there is no, and never will be, a single "one method cures all" way of rehabilitation. be it for drugs, smoking, pedophelia or phycopathic killing. no method is "proven" because they will only work in a minority of cases. it is up to the experts to decide if they are rehabilitated or not, the doctors and phychatrists. those that know best (and can spell t ...[text shortened]... . since when did the public know best?!?
meh...
* "their professions", i know...
And no, locking them up for life is not locking up 'everybody'. Poor use of language there. We're locking up people who have proven that they are willing to molest children.
And why shouldn't we allow the public to know when sex offenders move into their neighborhood?! You just pointed out that we never know for sure if we've rehabbed a sex offender. Given that, the public has a right to know and take precautions as they see fit.
Originally posted by Pawn QweenSome are developed at 15, some at 18. Some women I see are adults and still look like thay are halfway through puberty.
No it doesn't depend on the individual child. The age of consent is 16. Physical development has no bearing on anything.
The line has been drawn and the age is 16. So if you are having those thoughts about a 15 year old, they are the thoughts of a paedophile. Act on those thoughts and you definately are one. What was that you wanted to happen to paedophiles?
A pedo is someone who is attracted to people who are not developed yet, AKA children.