Go back
RHP Photography Competition...

RHP Photography Competition...

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Wildlife included?
Here's a reminder of the upcoming rounds...
3. Natural Wonders (Very Broad category encompassing mountains, lakes, sea, Fog Mist, Valleys, Wildlife, etc, etc. In fact its so broad, I'll allow contestants upto 5 entries each in this round.)

See just after Valleys and just before etc, etc. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paulie
Here's a reminder of the upcoming rounds...
3. Natural Wonders (Very Broad category encompassing mountains, lakes, sea, Fog Mist, Valleys, Wildlife, etc, etc. In fact its so broad, I'll allow contestants upto 5 entries each in this round.)

See just after Valleys and just before etc, etc. 😉
Duh! Drools on keyboard.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Duh! Drools on keyboard.
Are the pictures offline? all I'm getting is a black page in

http://community.webshots.com/user/rhpcomp

Am I using the wrong link?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Are the pictures offline? all I'm getting is a black page in

http://community.webshots.com/user/rhpcomp

Am I using the wrong link?
Yes. Here's the correct one:
http://cards.webshots.com/cp-101615419-QdDN-album/378667106mRlBIQ

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks and congratulations to The Plumber for sharing his delightful pictures.
The first place win for ‘leaf on a rock’ is well deserved. Its dreamlike quality gives the viewer the feeling there are fairies and pixies flitting about just beyond the frame.
With his permission I’d like to save it to my desktop. Really!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ictoan
Thanks and congratulations to The Plumber for sharing his delightful pictures.
The first place win for ‘leaf on a rock’ is well deserved. Its dreamlike quality gives the viewer the feeling there are fairies and pixies flitting about just beyond the frame.
With his permission I’d like to save it to my desktop. Really!
Permission granted - but if you want a higher res image you can go to my website.... www.kailey.biz

Thanks for the nice comments (even if wucky didn't vote for a single picture of mine.....hurumph!😉)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Plumber
Permission granted - but if you want a higher res image you can go to my website.... www.kailey.biz

Thanks for the nice comments (even if wucky didn't vote for a single picture of mine.....hurumph!😉)
😲 i already have your photos on my desktop...it wouldn't have been fair 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wucky3
😲 i already have your photos on my desktop...it wouldn't have been fair 😉
I figured as much....:'(

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Plumber
I figured as much....:'(
obviously i think your great...i just didn't want to show any favouritism. You understand don't you plumby 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wucky3
obviously i think your great...i just didn't want to show any favouritism. You understand don't you plumby 🙂
my great what? (think Bowman)

Of course I understand, Jo......:'(🙁:'(🙁:'(🙁:'(🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Any friendly volunteer who wishes to add the photo names to the above table is more than welcome. Me, I very nearly didn't even add the names of the photographers, as that alone took me the 20 minutes between posting the 'we have a winner' to the actual results.

I liked your photo Paulie, but I think it would have been better if u had cropped the peo ...[text shortened]...
18. People

[EDIT] And how would people feel about a [b]19. Best of the Rest
round?

D[/b]
I have some nice photos taken at night, of (churches and bridges).
Would these fit into natural light, extended exposure (it was quite long), manmade (I assume this covers architecture) or urban?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks Rag for the ratting 😉 lol bad enough to sit at home and play in a forum let alone driving miles to take a photo for one and ending up with no votes.
I took the angle that the subject was moving water (not still water). I wanted to photograph a celebration of the vibrancy and colour of moving water rather than use a slow exposure and stop the water movement. I'll know in future this isn't popular.
Well done to all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varg
I have some nice photos taken at night, of (churches and bridges).
Would these fit into natural light, extended exposure (it was quite long), manmade (I assume this covers architecture) or urban?
Ummmm, without seeing the photos, I'm not sure if they'd fit into Natural Light. Natural Light to me would mean that the main cool thing about the photo was as a result of natural light, whether its due to rays coming through clouds, sunrise/sunsets, nothern lights, natural creation of shadows, etc. Of course if the light from the moon was the cool thing about the photo, then go for it.

Manmade covers anything and everything made by man.

So I think it'd fit into extended exposure, manmade and urban, but maybe not natural light.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Alright, I'm pretty happy to get all three of my phots up near the top 10. Woot! Tons of great images, and too bad we need to pick only 8. Oh well, still fun!

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

well done plumber, seems you walked it.

some lovely pics didn't have too many pics of 'moving' water myself but now have a few new ideas after seeing some of these. now to find some moving water in a flat place?!?😕

when i get time i'll comment on the pictures

bring it on

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.