Go back
So IronMan was a cheat...

So IronMan was a cheat...

General

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
and should have a strong deterrent effect.
But it won't. It never does.

pineapple42

Joined
21 Aug 03
Moves
619937
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Russ tried the nice way, and it didn't work. Now we try it the tough way. Their is no great solution, but it's a lot better than doing nothing at all.

P-
For those of us that can never understand the complexities of the game at the highest level - will someone be demonstrating and explaining the proof submitted?

DS

Joined
03 Mar 05
Moves
21495
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
This is basically my point exactly.
The game mods do not know what they are doing.

They're implimenting a system with which they hope to use fear to keep people in check.

Doesn't work. Never has, never will.
if it's a very imperfect process, and no one can really be certain, then why not let it go? it's not like we're playing for money or anything. if you're here to play chess, then what does it really matter WHAT you're playing against?

i mean, i'm against using engines- hell, i don't even use databases (too lazy)- but i'm here for a challenge, so if someone is using a computer against me, then fine, what do i care? it's going to give me one helluva game, which i want.

i agree that this could get out of control. people seem to be beating the witch-hunt drums, and i find that more concerning than chess cheaters.

f
Mr. Flame of Fury

Winona Lake

Joined
09 Feb 05
Moves
29318
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

so since 2 players in the top ten were found to be cheating, are we investigating the top 50? the top 100?

I read the IronMan analysis too, and Akizy called his analysis excellent. I'm not so sure a cheater could give detailed analysis of his moves like Ironman did.

M
me, not you

CaNaDa

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
46658
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

geez.. go into a quick 30 minute meeting and miss all these posts!

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Darth Sponge
if it's a very imperfect process, and no one can really be certain, then why not let it go? it's not like we're playing for money or anything. if you're here to play chess, then what does it really matter WHAT you're playing against?

i mean, i'm against using engines- hell, i don't even use databases (too lazy)- but i'm here for a challen ...[text shortened]... le seem to be beating the witch-hunt drums, and i find that more concerning than chess cheaters.
This debate took place 8 months ago. Here's the results of the vote as to whether there should be Game Mods with the power to remove those found guilty by "overwhelming evidence" of using an engine. http://www.timeforchess.com/vote/result.php?voteid=2

If you want to play an engine, you can save 30-50 bucks and buy one or you can download many for free on the net.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by fierytorment
so since 2 players in the top ten were found to be cheating, are we investigating the top 50? the top 100?

I read the IronMan analysis too, and Akizy called his analysis excellent. I'm not so sure a cheater could give detailed analysis of his moves like Ironman did.
Why not?? Are you saying that NO ONE who has any understanding of chess would possibly cheat? Absurd. To me his analysis in that game was strongly indicative that he was a cheat, since he resigned in a position not even a Grandmaster would have on the basis that a series of moves potentially to be made by his opponent would have given that opponent a sizable advantage, but no forced win. Real players make the opponent make good moves, not resign on the possibility that they will.

s
Don't Like It Leave

Walking the earth.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
50664
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sasquatch672
I've also been accused of using an engine (only by one player), and my rating is crap because a) I have to bash no1 around and 2) I play too many games at once. The nerve!
Obviously you stink at both debate and chess.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Why not?? Are you saying that NO ONE who has any understanding of chess would possibly cheat? Absurd. To me his analysis in that game was strongly indicative that he was a cheat, since he resigned in a position not even a Grandmaster would have on the basis that a series of moves potentially to be made by his opponent would have given that opponent a siz ...[text shortened]... n. Real players make the opponent make good moves, not resign on the possibility that they will.
Speculation your honor!

Sustained.

K
Strawman

Not Kansas

Joined
10 Jul 04
Moves
6405
Clock
01 Sep 05
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Ironically, I couldn't agree more.
Well, let's look at fear then.
Are you afraid? The only thing I could be afraid of is being accused and booted (because I know I don't use engines)
I don't think it's too likely that's going to happen though because I think that the last thing Russ wants is to boot legit customers, ie have a real witch-hunt, bad for business ...
So, who is afraid? If somebody is an engine user, seeing some other user get the boot just might wake them up out of their "I'm Tal the Terrible" fantasy and make them play as themselves.

f
Mr. Flame of Fury

Winona Lake

Joined
09 Feb 05
Moves
29318
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm not saying that everyone that has knowledge of chess won't cheat, but I disagree with you on this fact. On Akizy's level, a sizeable advantage is game over for the most part. He's not going to make a obvious mistake, and I think Ironman realized he made a mistake. Whether he was cheating or not........ I'm skeptical

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Speculation your honor!

Sustained.
Expert testimony based on 40 years experience.

Overruled.

s
Geek

Behind you...

Joined
24 Feb 04
Moves
28311
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Expert testimony based on 40 years experience.

Overruled.
They've been making chess engines for 40 years?................

f
Mr. Flame of Fury

Winona Lake

Joined
09 Feb 05
Moves
29318
Clock
01 Sep 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just remember Akizy also did an analysis on that game too. Are we accusing him of cheating too?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.