17 Jun 16
Originally posted by Very RustyThat's right Rusty. Who are you to say what's right and what's wrong? For that matter who am I?
Subscriber josephw
But all gays are disturbed.
This is where I got that you said all gays are disturbed....Quite a blanket statement for sure. Lets see do I like to see two guys kissing....Well for one, I don't have to watch, I can look the other way. Does it disturb me? No, I figure live and let live. Who am I to say what they are doing is wrong or disturbed?
Kind Regards,
-VR
And who can question God? If God says it's wrong, it's wrong. And if God says it's wrong, then it's right for us to agree with God and say it's wrong too.
Simple logic.
You can "...figure live and let live" all you like. I'm not advocating forcing people to listen to God, but we can see what happens when they don't though. The evidence is clear to see, and God's judgement is already upon them.
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by josephwDo you believe that there should be discrimination against homosexuals built into a nation's laws?
That's right Rusty. Who are you to say what's right and what's wrong? For that matter who am I?
And who can question God? If God says it's wrong, it's wrong. And if God says it's wrong, then it's right for us to agree with God and say it's wrong too.
Simple logic.
You can "...figure live and let live" all you like. I'm not advocating forcing peopl ...[text shortened]... when they don't though. The evidence is clear to see, and God's judgement is already upon them.
Originally posted by FMFApparently, you've been living under a tarp somewhere: a sound-proof, impenetrable tarp which keeps not only sound but even the very concept of the outside world from ever troubling your cocoon.
Here are the words in proximity: "If we don't acquiesce to the Gay Mafia, well, they might slap us with the dreaded 'hater' label!! Best to keep dissent on the down low. If you know what I mean."
In your mind, what does you acquiescing involve? Why the need "to keep dissent on the down low"?
It is common among those who want to allude to (or even express ...[text shortened]... mean your "If you know what I mean" 'dog whistle' thing) correctly. Do you think I have?
Just a few years ago, it was commonly known that the other 98% of the population not only disapproved of homosexuality, the majority of that near majority found the act immoral and worthy of censure.
This repulsion was so intensely held--- and this will come as a shock to some of the younger readers--- every state in the union of the US had laws against homosexuality!
I know, right?!
With a tremendous campaign involving very connected and influential people, those who wanted the other 98% to accept the 2% on account of their private acts were able to alter public opinion--- at least the appearance of so, but definitely with respect to public policy makers and those within the various entertainment world.
What was formerly an unspoken badge of shame was transformed into one of honor... at least, that's what the script says.
We as a society acquiesce when we let that play go through its steps without an objection otherwise.
Consider the man who rails against pornography.
Most people view such a mission as a tilting at windmills, a man with an axe to grind, but, well, leave him be.
Overwhelmingly, we all hold pornography in contempt, find it morally reprehensible and generally consider those within its grasp disturbed.
Yet we won't join his quest nor will we condemn him in the process.
We are resigned to let him tire himself out pushing waves back into the ocean.
We do not call him a hater, or even a pornaphobe, no matter what other conclusions we may have about his stability.
Not so with those who see homosexuality as an affront to nature and a sin against God's design.
Those people are now haters.
Homophobes.
Even those who do not necessarily form an opinion from a spiritual stand-point but otherwise are repulsed?
Keep it to yourself, or get ready for the garage, hater.
Homophobe.
From my perspective, a hater or one who is generally afraid of someone else on the basis of what they do in the privacy (or should be doing only there) of their own homes will go out of their way to cause said people harm.
When Christians (or others similarly informed) refuse to help gays celebrate their lifestyle, they get labeled haters, homophobes.
What do we call militant Muslims who kill gays?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHNot so with those who see homosexuality as an affront to nature and a sin against God's design.
Apparently, you've been living under a tarp somewhere: a sound-proof, impenetrable tarp which keeps not only sound but even the very concept of the outside world from ever troubling your cocoon.
Just a few years ago, it was commonly known that the other 98% of the population not only disapproved of homosexuality, the majority of that near majority foun ...[text shortened]... estyle, they get labeled haters, homophobes.
What do we call militant Muslims who kill gays?
Therein lies the problem, and this is what happens when one subscribes to ancient Jewish mythology.
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by Proper Knobtherein lies the problem when one ignores the physiology of the human body!
[b]Not so with those who see homosexuality as an affront to nature and a sin against God's design.
Therein lies the problem when one subscribes to ancient Jewish mythology.[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNot all gay men have anal sex, and gay women certainly don't. We've been over this countless times before but it doesn't come as a surprise that someone with your limited mentally capacity fails to grasp this simple concept. You do believe in an actual Adam and Eve after all.
therein lies the problem when one ignores the physiology of the human body!
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by SeitseKept the banana hammock on?
Oh my, I think I forgot a couple of times 🙁
On the other hand, the flesh avocados never touched. That does it. Right?
You're straight as Rock Hudson.
I mean James Dean.
I mean the dad from the Brady Bunch.
I mean Tom Cruise.
I mean John Travolta.
I mean Cary Grant.
I mean Freddy Mercury.
I mean Anthony Perkins.
I mean Liberace.
Ah, forget it.
You gay.
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by Proper KnobI'll go with the ancient truth of God before any modern idiocy you can concoct.
[b]Not so with those who see homosexuality as an affront to nature and a sin against God's design.
Therein lies the problem, and this is what happens when one subscribes to ancient Jewish mythology.[/b]
You can't even distinguish between facts and frauds with your denigrating "mythology," so how could you possibly be trusted to structure a cogent system of law... which, you moron, is based on some ancient Jewish mythology?
Dipstick.
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHHe either does or he doesn't. I don't see why people like you and josephw - who dislike homosexuality - have to be so furtive. You either have principles and standards or you don't. You either champion these principles and standards or you don't. If you don't like the rolling back of discrimination, why not just say so? Why mumble, instead, about "loaded questions", and having to "acquiesce" and hiding your "dissent", when what you are being asked to address and speak about is in fact entirely straight forward?
Yeah, that's not the least bit loaded of a question.
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThis is just robbie carrobie type stuff.
I'll go with the ancient truth of God before any modern idiocy you can concoct.
You can't even distinguish between facts and frauds with your denigrating "mythology," so how could you possibly be trusted to structure a cogent system of law... which, you moron, is based on some ancient Jewish mythology?
Dipstick.