Originally posted by FMFIt should be built into national conscience. Instead, there has been a certain methodical dismantling of morality across virtually every front for the last fifty years. It seems that just about every personality is in on it from the president on down.
Do you believe that there should be discrimination against homosexuals built into a nation's laws?
Anyone that supports and promotes homosexuality is disturbed to one degree or another. It's in the mind. Minds are corrupted by the lack of moral convictions. Like the minds posting in these forums that claim there is no right or wrong, good or evil, but say it's just a matter of subjectivity and relativity.
Any and all that lack moral convictions based on the absolute standard of righteousness, which is built into the conscience, is in conflict with their own mind and soul. Disturbed.
Thing is though most don't even realize it because they have jumped through the hoops of their own mental gymnastics excusing themselves from accountability to any standard except their own.
18 Jun 16
Originally posted by josephwDo you believe that homosexuals are actually heterosexuals who have been corrupted by a lack of moral convictions?
It should be built into national conscience. Instead, there has been a certain methodical dismantling of morality across virtually every front for the last fifty years. It seems that just about every personality is in on it from the president on down.
Anyone that supports and promotes homosexuality is disturbed to one degree or another. It's in the mind. ...[text shortened]... own mental gymnastics excusing themselves from accountability to any standard except their own.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHBut on one hand you insinuate in a pusillanimous way that you are somehow being coerced into something or being silenced to some degree by homosexuality gaining wider acceptance in society, but then you just waffle away when asked about it, because, as we both know, your own rights are not impinged by the end of discrimination against homosexuals. You have been called out on it. That's why we now have this generic "you lack the ability to comprehend the issues" nonsense.
And you lack the ability to comprehend the issues as they are clearly and concisely being delineated.
Go figger.
Originally posted by FMFI doubt anyone could be more daft without being legally brain dead.
But on one hand you insinuate in a pusillanimous way that you are somehow being coerced into something or being silenced to some degree by homosexuality gaining wider acceptance in society, but then you just waffle away when asked about it, because, as we both know, your own rights are not impinged by the end of discrimination against homosexuals. You have been ...[text shortened]... t. That's why we now have this generic "you lack the ability to comprehend the issues" nonsense.
Coerced into something?!
How difficult is it for you to order at a restaurant, or do you just point at the pictures and grunt?
Anyone who speaks of anything remotely resembling dissent on the issue of homosexuality is immediately pounced upon and derided as a hater, and/or homophobe.
Please deny this so that your idiocy can receive the cherry on top.
I am not silent on the topic when it comes up.
For the most part, however, it simply is not an issue, nor do I go out of my way to make it so.
I've never said anything about my rights being trampled upon... except in response to your moronic questions along the same lines, so for you to latch onto the very thing which only you introduced is laughable.
You called me out?
Newsflash, chit-for-brains: it was your idea in the first place.
I didn't see your response to the question I asked in the earlier post.
The one which asked about your position on graphically educating our youth in the ways of homosexual acts.
Did you not answer because you are not heterosexual, male or neither?
Or did you not respond because you don't want to admit you harbor hatred and are okay with 'some' discrimination towards gays?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI doubt anyone could be more daft without being legally brain dead.
Coerced into something?!
How difficult is it for you to order at a restaurant, or do you just point at the pictures and grunt?
Anyone who speaks of anything remotely resembling dissent on the issue of homosexuality is immediately pounced upon and derided as a hater, and/or homophobe.
Please deny this so that your idiocy can receive the cherry on top.
I am not silent on the topic when it comes up.
For the most part, however, it simply is not an issue, nor do I go out of my way to make it so.
I've never said anything about my rights being trampled upon... except in response to your moronic questions along the same lines, so for you to latch onto the very thing which only you introduced is laughable.
You called me out?
Newsflash, chit-for-brains: it was your idea in the first place.
This is just more robbie carrobie-like deflection.
18 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHBut this isn't an answer to the question that was put to you or anything remotely like it. It's a dodge. Do you think your rights are somehow being threatened by the gradual end to discrimination against homosexuals?
None of my heterosexual maleness is the least bit threatened by the knowledge that some guys are putting their penises in the orifices of other guys or otherwise engaged in similar behavior.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHDon't you support the right to free speech for people to voice their disapproval of you and your views just as you insist on your freedom to free speech to voice your disapproval of others? How are you being restricted? You talked about having to "acquiesce" and, to some degree, hide your "dissent". Why?
What I find incongruous with reason, however, is the campaign of name calling and labeling underway by those who wish to shame those who voice their disapproval of another party's behavior.
18 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHLeave the final decision on this to the parents as long as their children are minors.
I don't believe there is ANYONE in the other 98% of society who accepts homosexuality on a basis of respect or acknowledgement equal to the acceptance of what they consider to be the normative sexual behavior of man to such an extent that they wish to see homosexual acts graphically folded into sexual education classes taught to society's children.
18 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI think parents should have control over the content of sex ed their children are exposed to - or at least a veto with regards to their child, or opt-out - regardless of whether the sexual orientation covered by the material is dealing with heterosexuality or homosexuality. If your children are being forced to see any graphic sexual images against your will and without your consent, then I would support your opposition to it. Is that what is happening?
Do you think it appropriate to allow society to continue its discrimination against gays by purposely leaving their acts out of the educational process?
18 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo, do you advocate a restriction of the right to free speech of those who disagree with you and who criticize you? Surely not. So what if they call you a hater or a homophobe?
Anyone who speaks of anything remotely resembling dissent on the issue of homosexuality is immediately pounced upon and derided as a hater, and/or homophobe.