17 Jun 16
Originally posted by Proper Knobbwahahah, strawman and an ad hominem all rolled into one, man you baked!
Not all gay men have anal sex, and gay women certainly don't. We've been over this countless times before but it doesn't come as a surprise that someone with your limited mentally capacity fails to grasp this simple concept. You do believe in an actual Adam and Eve after all.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHOh dear. Lots of text. No real answer. Let me try again:
Apparently, you've been living under a tarp somewhere: a sound-proof, impenetrable tarp which keeps not only sound but even the very concept of the outside world from ever troubling your cocoon.
Just a few years ago, it was commonly known that the other 98% of the population not only disapproved of homosexuality, the majority of that near majority foun ...[text shortened]... estyle, they get labeled haters, homophobes.
What do we call militant Muslims who kill gays?
Are you a heterosexual who dislikes the changing status and mores pertaining to homosexuals in the society around you and do you think your own rights are somehow being threatened by the gradual end to discrimination against homosexuals?
Originally posted by FMFPlease enough of the interrogation trolling, its quite tedious. Try to be more accommodating.
Oh dear. Lots of text. No real answer. Let me try again:
Are you a heterosexual who dislikes the changing status and mores pertaining to homosexuals in the society around you and do you think your own rights are somehow being threatened by the gradual end to discrimination against homosexuals?
Originally posted by FMFOh dear. Lots of tut-tuting, but no comprehension.
Oh dear. Lots of text. No real answer. Let me try again:
Are you a heterosexual who dislikes the changing status and mores pertaining to homosexuals in the society around you and do you think your own rights are somehow being threatened by the gradual end to discrimination against homosexuals?
Yes, I am a heterosexual.
Thanks for asking.
I don't believe there is ANYONE in the other 98% of society who accepts homosexuality on a basis of respect or acknowledgement equal to the acceptance of what they consider to be the normative sexual behavior of man to such an extent that they wish to see homosexual acts graphically folded into sexual education classes taught to society's children.
If you are a heterosexual man, how do you see that issue, exactly?
Do you think it appropriate to allow society to continue its discrimination against gays by purposely leaving their acts out of the educational process?
None of my heterosexual maleness is the least bit threatened by the knowledge that some guys are putting their penises in the orifices of other guys or otherwise engaged in similar behavior.
Literally couldn't care less.
I see no threat to even one of any of my personal freedoms in light of this Gay New World.
What I find incongruous with reason, however, is the campaign of name calling and labeling underway by those who wish to shame those who voice their disapproval of another party's behavior.
It is reverse discrimination and only one blinded by personal bias sees it otherwise.
Except in this case, the discrimination is not based on private life matters: it's based on privately held thought!
"Well," says the Gay New World Order Thought Police, "you can have those private thoughts, but don't even thinking about making them public!"
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by FMFAnd you lack the ability to comprehend the issues as they are clearly and concisely being delineated.
Two posters who like to insinuate that they are somehow 'losing some of their rights' because of the gradual demise of discrimination against homosexuals ~ both dodging and deflecting. 😉
Go figger.
17 Jun 16
1 edit
Originally posted by josephwWhat about people who do not believe in God? The Bible was writtten by men not God!
That's right Rusty. Who are you to say what's right and what's wrong? For that matter who am I?
And who can question God? If God says it's wrong, it's wrong. And if God says it's wrong, then it's right for us to agree with God and say it's wrong too.
Simple logic.
You can "...figure live and let live" all you like. I'm not advocating forcing peopl ...[text shortened]... when they don't though. The evidence is clear to see, and God's judgement is already upon them.
Now lets entertain the idea that there is a God, isn't he suppose to be all forgiving God?
Or does that apply to everyone except homosexuals?
-VR
17 Jun 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIn other words, we can't object to gays but we can keep it inside that we hate their guts.
Are you serious!?!
You haven't heard?
We ALL accept homosexuality now.
I know, I know: I can hear your objection now.
It used to be we completely were against it just a few years ago--- nearly unanimously.
But, well, times is tough.
If we don't acquiesce to rhe Gay Mafia, well, they might slap us with the dreaded 'hater' label!!
Best to keep dissent on the down low.
If you know what I mean.
Originally posted by sonhouseWell....Now there is another way to look at it. It leaves more women for you to chose from. Why do you have to hate because you don't agree with their sexual preference? Actually, i don't believe they have a choice. Same as you don't have one that you like women.
In other words, we can't object to gays but we can keep it inside that we hate their guts.
-VR
17 Jun 16
You people are a bunch of twits.
One difference between moral and legal norms is "exteriority". It means
that the former encompass your internal realm and its workings while the
latter come into play solely when the feelings or thoughts are exteriorized
via a perceivable action.
So you're arguing idiocies. People can feel and think whatever they please
as long as they don't exteriorize it in a way which affects others and is
sanctioned by the applicable laws within a certain jurisdiction.
This is, like, the ABC of legal theory.