The post that was quoted here has been removedBut isn't he just tackling YOU on YOUR claims about his [and my] supposed lack of popularity?
I mean, when you reply with post Z to post X, which was itself a reply to post Y, your post Z cannot simply ignore what post Y had said.
If you do that, your approach to the discourse is just gimmicky.
14 Jul 21
@kevin-eleven saidShouldn’t you?
If you were capable of making accurate assessments and thereby touching nerves or making people wince, shouldn't your moral compass guide you toward exercising self-restraint?
14 Jul 21
@kevin-eleven saidThat depends on what the impairment is and how they behave.
If you believe someone is impaired in some way, wouldn't it be unethical for you to bully them repeatedly?
For example, you seem somewhat impaired to me in certain ways, but you are also a malicious little weasel who’s chops need slapping on a regular basis.
14 Jul 21
@divegeester saidDo you?
I’ve got another intelligence text question for you. This is one you have dodged on at least 20 previous occasions…
Do you feel it is wrong to “hurl insults”?
@kevin-eleven saidYou should ask Suzianne, she’s currently already undertaking doing an either 2.5 year, or a 3 year (she hasn’t decided despite already starting it) Masters in Psychology, because it’s hard.
I'm no psychologist, but perhaps each of them feels he is only half a man, and they complete each other.
Perhaps her research topic (she won’t say what it is because she thinks I’ll be able to use it like an address to track her down) will cover off your area of interest about men only being half men and joining together to become one man?
Sounds like your idea of a sweaty Saturday night.
14 Jul 21
@kevin-eleven saidDo you see yourself in this mid thread exchange as one of the key protagonists?
[We'll take a short break now while the tag-team duo consult with each other and do some research for their rebuttals.]