07 Jan 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo, 'silly goad' curious you would assume I thought he was talking to me. I knew he was talking to drewnogal and my statement stands: It was mean and uncalled for.
Curious sir how you assume he was talking about you.
😆
-VR
07 Jan 19
@very-rusty saidHe wasn't talking 'about' Drewnogal. He was responding to her as the thread creator and answering her question.
No, 'silly goad' curious you would assume I thought he was talking to me. I knew he was talking to drewnogal and my statement stands: It was mean and uncalled for.
-VR
Obviously.
07 Jan 19
@ghost-of-a-duke said@ Drewnogal...
He wasn't talking 'about' Drewnogal. He was responding to her as the thread creator and answering her question.
Obviously.
Appeared at first look he was calling names.
Not he was giving the same answer three times... That was just 'silly!!!
-VR
07 Jan 19
@very-rusty saidNow I’d describe myself more as a vindictive btch than a smartass.
@ Drewnogal...
Appeared at first look he was calling names.
Not he was giving the same answer three times... That was just 'silly!!!
-VR
🤔
@drewnogal saidI had been thinking the same thing, but it wouldn't be nice to actually say it!!! 😉
Now I’d describe myself more as a vindictive btch than a smartass.
🤔
-VR
@very-rusty said😉
I had been thinking the same thing, but it wouldn't be nice to actually say it!!! 😉
-VR
07 Jan 19
@very-rusty saidRealizing your error, is your apology to Moonbus pending?!
@ Drewnogal...
Appeared at first look he was calling names.
Not he was giving the same answer three times... That was just 'silly!!!
-VR
07 Jan 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo, he will understand unlike you! 😉
Realizing your error, is your apology to Moonbus pending?!
-VR
07 Jan 19
@very-rusty saidToo small to apologize, hey Napoleon.
No, he will understand unlike you! 😉
-VR
Thought so.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI'll tell you what, you apologize for calling me Napoleon and I'll apologize.
Too small to apologize, hey Napoleon.
Thought so.
If not carry on being 'silly goad'!!!
I like you sounding 'silly' though so please continue.
-VR
07 Jan 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidActually I still think it was silly to post it as 1,2,&3 saying the same thing.
Realizing your error, is your apology to Moonbus pending?!
Apology most likely not forthcoming!
-VR
07 Jan 19
@very-rusty saidI honestly have never met anybody with such a vacuous awareness of humour and who takes everything at face value.
Actually I still think it was silly to post it as 1,2,&3 saying the same thing.
Apology most likely not forthcoming!
-VR
As for wanting an apology for calling you Napoleon when for my first 3 years here you referred to me (and others) as non-sub scum, you can go whistle.
07 Jan 19
@drewnogal saidIt was not you I was referring to, or hoping to avoid.
Now I’d describe myself more as a vindictive btch than a smartass.
🤔
@very-rusty saidBut it isn't the same answer. It was spelt three different ways. With some smartness, you recognize them for what they are only gradually towards the end, whereas with others you recognize them as smartness only at the very very end, and with still others you get their 'payoff' both coming and going (which is why their Arse$ are capitalized).
@ Drewnogal...
Appeared at first look he was calling names.
Not he was giving the same answer three times... That was just 'silly!!!
-VR
Meta-communication goes right over your head, doesn't it?