Originally posted by KorchNot to be picky but it looks like the answers seem to be based on unbased presumptions instead of facts as well.
[b]Does questioning how the analysis is done make someone protector of someone found to be a cheat?
Taking into account that this questioning is based on unbased presumption`s instead of facts, my answer is YES.[/b]
Originally posted by PhlabibitThey are now waiting for game mods to kick cheats off the site, and they haven't been wrong about anyone yet. It sure does take the game mods a long time to figure out, what they have already figured out. 😉
Why don't YOU compare the smarts of the OTB club to No one and see if they agree with YOU?
P-
Some of it is just the matter of looking at the graph, even you or I could do that, and we got no chess skills, in comparison to many on this site.
Originally posted by PhlabibitSorry he isn't my hero. I'm not into hero worship like you are to Darvley. XanthosNZ, and Bowmann. I'll leave all the serenading to you. May all their daughters be blessed with long flowing dark hair all over their face.
Shouldn't you be writing a love sonnet for your hero NMDB?
P-
Originally posted by Very RustyNow now vr... I've said, and other game mods have also said that the admins are the bottle-neck.
They are now waiting for game mods to kick cheats off the site, and they haven't been wrong about anyone yet. It sure does take the game mods a long time to figure out, what they have already figured out. 😉
Some of it is just the matter of looking at the graph, even you or I could do that, and we got no chess skills, in comparison to many on this site.
The OTB club doesn't lose a thing if they decide a user is a cheat. Admins lose money, and get feedback from people like YOU who won't admit an user was a cheat.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitSo, it boils down to the money thing, now that does make sense!
Now now vr... I've said, and other game mods have also said that the admins are the bottle-neck.
The OTB club doesn't lose a thing if they decide a user is a cheat. Admins lose money, and get feedback from people like YOU who won't admit an user was a cheat.
P-
We all know, the admins go by what the game mods find. It is not like they do the analysis themselves.
Originally posted by cashthetrashThe question still remains is the way the analysis done. Can they say with absolute 100% certainty that the person is a cheat on every occasion? That would be to say that the humans never made a mistake if the answer is yes.
It always has and actually seems reasonable. It takes money to keep a site running. If all the members keep getting run off who is going to be left to switch off the lights in the end?
I know they say it is the Admins decision. But it is only one they make after the analysis from the Game Mods of course. So realistically the decision is being made by the Game Mods, and approval stamped by the Admins, the way I see it.
I am glad I am not the one, having to make those decisions!
Originally posted by Very RustyThis has been explained to you a million times. Would a million and one help?
The question still remains is the way the analysis done. Can they say with absolute 100% certainty that the person is a cheat on every occasion? That would be to say that the humans never made a mistake if the answer is yes.
I know they say it is the Admins decision. But it is only one they make after the analysis from the Game Mods of course. So reali ...[text shortened]... ed by the Admins, the way I see it.
I am glad I am not the one, having to make those decisions!
Originally posted by Palynkaabsolutely not, and nothing has been explained, there are big parts left out. What are these other tools used for example? That only the chosen few know about, and can't say? Are they tools that could be debated on how fool proof they are?
This has been explained to you a million times. Would a million and one help?
Lots of question unanswered, but you don't really know, or care , your are just staying on side, like the good yes boy that you are.