Where In The World Is~~~Kevin Eleven☹️!

@ghost-of-a-duke said
May I suggest you widen your points of reference?

I don't think "incontrovertible evidence" need play a role in forming a perspective on whether someone's belief - in supernatural phenomena for example - is a delusion.

@fmf said
It hasn't "hit home" at all. I just happen to think, as rhetoric goes, it does a disservice to you.

You sound a little rattled. Let's take a break and get some frozen yogurt.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I think the custard tart thing has hit home and you now realise you have been trivialising what it actually means to have a delusion.

you now realise you have been trivialising what it actually means to have a delusion

I haven't been trivializing anything.

@fmf said
you now realise you have been trivialising what it actually means to have a delusion

I haven't been trivializing anything.

You seem to love continuing in lost debates fmf! What would make you think you could go up against the Ghost and win. Are you delusional??? 🙂 😛

-VR

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You sound a little rattled.

A generic comment like this is perhaps a moment when you can bail out of the conversation. I am not "rattled" in the slightest.

@very-rusty said
What words are added to the dictionary in 2023?

Carry on reading to discover 7 new English words and how you can use them in 2023.
Side hustle. Definition: Are you trying to scrimp and save for your holiday but you still haven't got enough money? ...
Sentient. ...
Permacrisis. ...
Sportswashing. ...
Jabbed/Vaxxed. ...
Gaslighting. ...
Cringe.

Gaslighting seems ...[text shortened]...

OH yes, and where in the is Keven Eleven, I almost forgot what this thread was about. 🙂

-VR

The word Sentient has been around for hundreds of years.
Cringe has also been around for a long time.

@the-gravedigger said
The word Sentient has been around for hundreds of years.
Cringe has also been around for a long time.

Well you talk to the people at Cambridge who just decided to add them my friend. 🙂

Jabbed has been around for many years also, just passing along some useless information. I have a reputation to protect you know. 🙂 😛

Academics
Admissions + Aid
Athletics + Arts
Alumni + Friends
Campus Life
Traditions
About
Traditions
Home/Traditions/Banished Words List
2023-Banished-Words-Poster
2023 Banished Words List

2023 Banished Words List Press Release

We Kid You Not: GOAT Tops Inflection Point, Quiet Quitting, and Gaslighting
As Greatest of All Time Words and Terms That Lake Superior State University Banishes for 2023

Dec. 31, 2022

Sault Ste. Marie, MI — Stop resorting to imprecise, trite, and meaningless words and terms of seeming convenience! You’re taking the lazy way out and only confusing matters by over-relying on inexact, stale, and inane communication!

Language monitors across the country and around the world decried the decrepitude and futility of basic methods to impart information in their mock-serious entries for Lake Superior State University’s annual tongue-in-cheek Banished Words List. LSSU announces the results of the yearly compendium on Dec. 31 to start the New Year on the right foot, er, tongue.

The vast majority of the 1,500-plus nominations of words and terms for banishment for misuse, overuse, and uselessness for 2023 reveled and wallowed in the erosion of fundamental expression.

Ranked No. 1 as the best of the worst: GOAT, acronym for Greatest of All Time. The many nominators didn’t have to be physicists or grammarians to determine the literal impossibility and technical vagueness of this wannabe superlative. Yet it’s bestowed on everyone from Olympic gold medalists to Jeopardy! champions, as one muckraker playfully deplored. Meanwhile, other naysayers remarked on social media posts that brandish a photo of, for instance, multiple cricket players or soccer stars with a caption about several GOATs in one frame.

“Words and terms matter. Or at least they should. Especially those that stem from the casual or causal. That’s what nominators near and far noticed, and our contest judges from the LSSU School of Arts and Letters agreed,” said Peter Szatmary, executive director of marketing and communications at Lake State.

“They veritably bleated their disapproval about the attempted nonpareil of GOAT because the supposed designation becomes an actual misnomer. The singularity of ‘greatest of all time’ cannot happen, no way, no how. And instead of being selectively administered, it’s readily conferred. Remember Groucho Marx’s line about not wanting to join a club that would accept him as member?

“The nine additional words and terms banished for 2023—from new no-nos ‘inflection point’ at No. 2 and ‘gaslighting’ at No. 4 to repeat offenders ‘amazing’ at No. 6 and ‘It is what it is’ at No. 10—also fall somewhere on the spectrum between specious and tired. They’re empty as balderdash or diluted through oversaturation. Be careful—be more careful—with buzzwords and jargon.”

LSSU has compiled an annual Banished Words List since 1976, and later copyrighted the concept, to uphold, protect, and support excellence in language by encouraging avoidance of words and terms that are overworked, redundant, oxymoronic, clichéd, illogical, nonsensical—and otherwise ineffective, baffling, or irritating.

Over the decades, Lake State has received tens of thousands of nominations for the list, which now totals more than 1,000 entries. Examples of the winners (or should that be losers?) to make the yearly compilation: “detente,” “surely,” “classic,” “bromance,” and “COVID-19,” plus “wrap my head around,” “user friendly,” “at this point in time,” “not so much,” and “viable alternative.” The Banished Words List has become such a cultural phenomenon that comedian George Carlin submitted an entry that made the annals in 1994: “baddaboom, baddabing.”

This year, nominations came from most major U.S. cities and many U.S. states, plus Australia, New Zealand, France, Italy, Portugal, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, the Netherlands, Belgium, the Czech Republic, India, China, Namibia, South Africa, Nigeria, American Samoa, Malaysia, the British Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, and throughout Canada.

Here are the list of the banished words and terms for 2023 and the reasons for their banishment:

1. GOAT

The acronym for Greatest of All Time gets the goat of petitioners and judges for overuse, misuse, and uselessness. “Applied to everyone and everything from athletes to chicken wings,” an objector declared. “How can anyone or anything be the GOAT, anyway?” Records fall; time continues. Some sprinkle GOAT like table salt on “anyone who’s really good.” Another wordsmith: ironically, “goat” once suggested something unsuccessful; now, GOAT is an indiscriminate flaunt.

2. Inflection point

Mathematical term that entered everyday parlance and lost its original meaning. This year’s version of “pivot,” banished in 2021. “Chronic throat-clearing from historians, journalists, scientists, or politicians. Its ubiquity has driven me to an inflection point of throwing soft objects about whenever I hear it,” a quipster recounted. “Inflection point has reached its saturation point and point of departure,” proclaimed another. “Pretentious way to say turning point.” Overuse and misuse.

3. Quiet quitting

Trendy but inaccurate. Not an employee who inconspicuously resigns. Instead, an employee who completes the minimum requirements for a position. Some nominator reasons: “normal job performance,” “fancy way of saying ‘work to rule,’” “nothing more than companies complaining about workers refusing to be exploited,” “it’s not a new phenomenon; it’s burnout, ennui, boredom, disengagement.” On the precipice for next year’s Banished Words List as well for ongoing misuse and overuse.

4. Gaslighting

Nominators are not crazy by arguing that overuse disconnects the term from the real concern it has identified in the past: dangerous psychological manipulation that causes victims to distrust their thoughts, feelings, memories, or perception of reality. Others cited misuse: an incorrect catchall to refer generally to conflict or disagreement. It’s too obscure of a reference to begin with, avowed sundry critics, alluding to the 1938 play and 1940/44 movies.

5. Moving forward

Misuse, overuse, and uselessness. “Where else would we go?” wondered a sage—since we can’t, in fact, travel backward in time. “May also refer to ‘get my way,’ as in, ‘How can we move forward?’ Well, guess what? Sometimes you can’t,” another wit stated. Politicians and bosses often wield it for “semantic legitimacy” of self-interest, evasion, or disingenuousness. Its next of kin, “going forward,” banished in 2001, also received votes.

6. Amazing

“Not everything is amazing; and when you think about it, very little is,” a dissenter explained. “This glorious word should be reserved for that which is dazzling, moving, or awe-inspiring,” to paraphrase another, “like the divine face of a newborn.” Initially banished for misuse, overuse, and uselessness in 2012. Its cyclical return mandates further nixing of the “generic,” “banal and hollow” modifier—a “worn-out adjective from people short on vocabulary.”

7. Does that make sense?

Submitters rejected the desire, perhaps demand, for clarification or affirmation as filler, insecurity, and passive aggression. “Why say it, if you must ask? It just doesn’t make sense!” tsk-tsked one. In this call for reassurance or act of false modesty, enquirers warp respondents into “co-conspirators,” deduced another. Needy, scheming, and/or cynical. Let me be clear, judges opined: Always make sense; don’t think aloud or play games! Misuse, overuse, and uselessness.

8. Irregardless

Sleuth confession: “It makes my hair hurt.” As well it should—because it’s not a word. At most, it’s a nonstandard word, per some dictionaries. “Regardless” suffices. Opponents disqualified it as a double negative. One conveyed that the prefix “ir” + “regardless” = redundancy. “Take ‘regardless’ and dress it up for emphasis, showcasing your command of nonexistent words,” excoriated an exasperated correspondent, adding, “Why isn’t this on your list?” Misuse.

9. Absolutely

Banished in 1996, but deserves a repeat nope given its overuse. Usurped the simple “yes,” laments a contributor. Another condemned it as “the current default to express agreement, endemically present on TV in one-on-one interviews.” Frequently “said too loudly by annoying people who think they’re better than you,” bemoaned an aggrieved observer. “Sounds like it comes with a guarantee when that may not be the case,” cautioned a wary watchdog.

10. It is what it is

Banished in 2008 for overuse, misuse, and uselessness: “pointless,” “cop-out,” “Only Yogi Berra should be allowed to utter such a circumlocution.” Its resurgence prompted these insights: “Well, duh.” “No kidding.” “Of course it is what it is! What else would it be? It would be weird if it wasn’t what it wasn’t.” “Tautology.” “Adds no value.” “Verbal crutch.” “Excuse not to deal with reality or accept responsibility.” “Dismissive, borderline rude.”

“Our linguists, editors, and philosophers, comics, gatekeepers, and pundits didn’t succumb to quiet quitting when laboring over rife miscommunication. Rather, they turned in discerning opinions about rampant verbal and written blunders with equal parts amusement, despair, and outrage. But our nominators insisted, and our Arts and Letters faculty judges concurred, that to decree the Banished Words List 2023 as the GOAT is tantamount to gaslighting. Does that make sense?” said LSSU President Dr. Rodney S. Hanley. “Irregardless, moving forward, it is what it is: an absolutely amazing inflection point of purposeless and ineptitude that overtakes so many mouths and finger...

@very-rusty said
Well you talk to the people at Cambridge who just decided to add them my friend. 🙂

Jabbed has been around for many years also, just passing along some useless information. I have a reputation to protect you know. 🙂 😛

-VR

They didn't decide to add them. The article states that they are returning to more popular usage, old chum.

@the-gravedigger said
They didn't decide to add them. The article states that they are returning to more popular usage, old chum.

Well old chap I don't make the rules for Cambridge Dictionary which is a good thing. 🙂

-VR

@very-rusty said
Well old chap I don't make the rules for Cambridge Dictionary which is a good thing. 🙂

-VR

If you are going to comment on your pasting its a good idea to read the article beforehand. 😉 😉 😛 😛

@the-gravedigger said
If you are going to comment on your pasting its a good idea to read the article beforehand. 😉 😉 😛 😛

Wouldn't that make copying and pasting a waste of time??? 😛 🙂

I've seen even more silly things copy and pasted by certain people who will remain unnamed for now. 🙂 😛

You go argue with Cambridge Dictionary people. 🙂 😛


-VR

@fmf said
you now realise you have been trivialising what it actually means to have a delusion

I haven't been trivializing anything.

A delusion, in any meaningful sense, is something that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary. (The very thing that makes it delusional).

You offer a trivialised version that perhaps would be more at home on Twitter.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
A delusion, in any meaningful sense, is something that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary. (The very thing that makes it delusional).

You offer a trivialised version that perhaps would be more at home on Twitter.

I have not "trivialized" it at all. I use it in its everyday sense. The whole "indisputable evidence to the contrary" element is surplus to requirements when it comes to using the word.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you always struggle to follow the nuances of conversation?

No I don't "struggle". It's interesting how often you resort to claiming I "struggle" in this way, which you do instead of making a debate point.

It's one of your generic rhetorical gimmicks. That and "Oh you seem rattled" and "This is going very badly for you" which are claims that are invariably not true.

Your idea that I somehow had to concede that my belief in the supernatural back when I was a Christian was a delusion, and to do so - back then - in the face of "indisputable" and "incontrovertible" evidence... for me to be able to, now, speaking as a non-believer, recognize that that former belief was a delusion, is a nonsensical criterion you are trying to superimpose onto this discussion and the everyday sense of the word "delusion".