Where In The World Is~~~Kevin Eleven☹️!

@fmf said
No I don't "struggle". It's interesting how often you resort to claiming I "struggle" in this way, which you do instead of making a debate point.

It's one of your generic rhetorical gimmicks. That and "Oh you seem rattled" and "This is going very badly for you" which are claims that are invariably not true.

Your idea that I somehow had to concede that my belief in the sup ...[text shortened]... on you are trying to superimpose onto this discussion and the everyday sense of the word "delusion".

Hard to believe you were ever a Christian TBH.

You really do seem to struggle, I don't think that is an exaggeration.

-VR

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Throwing delusion about like a custard tart only validates the point I have been making.

neither FMF nor I ….

- Dread meetings with our colleagues
- Post about feeling “broken” and “destroyed” by a glitch in commercial transaction
- Write histrionic emails to a radio program claiming to be losing sleep and having various trauma because their name was changed on a local radio program.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Yes sir, that is what we do in Outreach. 🙄

It’s what you do.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I am no more a 'claimed' mental health practitioner than you are a 'claimed' Christian.

Do you well to remember that.

Dodge noted.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Without incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, who gets to decide when something isn't true?

You, a hard atheist, are now suggesting that Suzianne’s angel visitation … could be true?

@divegeester said
neither FMF nor I ….

- Dread meetings with our colleagues
- Post about feeling “broken” and “destroyed” by a glitch in commercial transaction
- Write histrionic emails to a radio program claiming to be losing sleep and having various trauma because their name was changed on a local radio program.

Weaponising personal info on a Sunday morning.

Tutt tutt

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Thread warning:

'Delusions' are being thrown around like custard tarts in this thread. FMF has hit Dive squarely in the face, and inexplicably, Dive has hit himself in the face.

Well this is your assertion, but you’re not doing a very good job of defending it.

@divegeester said
It’s what you do.

I guarantee sir I spend less time in an office than yourself.

@ghost-of-a-duke said

I've been keeping a log.

Flogging one more like.

@divegeester said
You, a hard atheist, are now suggesting that Suzianne’s angel visitation … could be true?

No. I am asking who is in a position to call somebody else delusional?

(You are excluded from that conversation, on account of describing your own views as delusional).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If somebody believes something you don't, but you are unable to aptly evidence they are wrong, you are not in a position to call them delusional.

So if some says they have seen fairies at the bottom of their garden and spoken with them, they aren’t delusional?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Let's be honest sir, you should have bailed out a long time ago...

How “Suzianne” of you.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You are using it in a strange, watered down, FMF sense. it is not the same.

Not the same as what?

@divegeester said
Flogging one more like.

To quote FMF:

"And I don’t think banter like this is you at your best."

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I don’t think banter like this is you at your best.

More “Suzianneisms”