General
15 Jul 21
@badradger saidThanks for the info, I’ll update my files accordingly.
I have nothing but respect for Suzzie allthough we dont bother much with each other in posts all I can say is any enemy of you is a friend of mine.
@very-rusty saidThe way it usually works is that a poster has a good idea for a thread and creates it. When lots of different posters do the same it leads to an interesting and diverse range of threads.
How many times is it now do you claim far more engaging content in this forum?
Now if you had said Hostile engaging content, you probably would have gotten thumbs up in the double digits!
Have A Great Day!
-VR
In Dive's case, in a bid to be a leading forum generator of content, he creates threads even when he doesn't have a good idea for a topic. This, as we have seen, leads to a constant stream of weak threads that if anything dulls the creativity of the GF. Anyone can create a splurge of naff threads. There are no medals to be won for that.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidJust talk directly to me and stop being big fairy.
The way it usually works is that a poster has a good idea for a thread and creates it. When lots of different posters do the same it leads to an interesting and diverse range of threads.
In Dive's case, in a bid to be a leading forum generator of content, he creates threads even when he doesn't have a good idea for a topic. This, as we have seen, leads to a constan ...[text shortened]... vity of the GF. Anyone can create a splurge of naff threads. There are no medals to be won for that.
You’re worse than the spineless KellyJay. 😁
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThis is something I must agree with you on.
The way it usually works is that a poster has a good idea for a thread and creates it. When lots of different posters do the same it leads to an interesting and diverse range of threads.
In Dive's case, in a bid to be a leading forum generator of content, he creates threads even when he doesn't have a good idea for a topic. This, as we have seen, leads to a constan ...[text shortened]... vity of the GF. Anyone can create a splurge of naff threads. There are no medals to be won for that.
I believe what you said to be very true, no matter who the poster is including myself.
I know I've done the same as him in the past, take a long time to mend those bridges as people have long memories.
-VR
@very-rusty saidIntelligibility encryption “activated”
I believe what you said to be very true, no matter who the poster is including myself.
@divegeester saidTry adding the whole context of what I said to you in the quote would be so considerate of you in the future!
Intelligibility encryption “activated”
Again, Have A Great Day!
-VR
@very-rusty saidYep I got you first time.
Again, Have A Great Day!
-VR
Have a good one yourself pal.
@divegeester saidthe only files you have are the ones you use to sharpen your spitefull tongue.
Thanks for the info, I’ll update my files accordingly.
@badradger saidCould you list all the names you’ve been calling me please?
the only files you have are the ones you use to sharpen your spitefull tongue.
Just so I can see what it is you are talking about.
@very-rusty saidIn your case, you certainly posted in too many threads, but I don't think you created too many. (I think you posted more in threads that were already there).
This is something I must agree with you on.
I believe what you said to be very true, no matter who the poster is including myself.
I know I've done the same as him in the past, take a long time to mend those bridges as people have long memories.
-VR
A thread should come into existence on the back of a good idea, not due to a compulsion to create as many threads as possible. Quantity actually dilutes quality.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWell water or an ice cub surely dilutes a “good” Scotch.👍😥
In your case, you certainly posted in too many threads, but I don't think you created too many. (I think you posted more in threads that were already there).
A thread should come into existence on the back of a good idea, not due to a compulsion to create as many threads as possible. Quantity actually dilutes quality.