About @RJHinds
"I am a former USCF member with highest over-the-board rating of 1817. I have not played in a long time and joined this site in order get rid of the rust in hopes that I might learn to play good chess. I am also U. S. Army retired.
UPDATE: My rating after 5 months of play is 1825 at RHP. I have posted on the Spirituality Forum. I don't believe the theory of evolution.
UPDATE FEB 2012: I joined a chess club again after 30 years to play OTB chess. They have the room for only 2 hours, so they play 15 minute quick and 45 minute regular games. Both are quicker than I was used to playing. I'm not doing too well. I joined another chess club that plays 90 minute games but it takes me nearly 1 1/2 hours to get there.
UPDATE AUG 20, 2012: After returning to OTB chess from a 30 year break my regular rating is now 1547 from 38 games. However I did defeat a 1900+ player on my way down playing the longer time controls of G/90, d/5."
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThanks; I think we all know how to read a profile though.
About @RJHinds
"I am a former USCF member with highest over-the-board rating of 1817. I have not played in a long time and joined this site in order get rid of the rust in hopes that I might learn to play good chess. I am also U. S. Army retired.
UPDATE: My rating after 5 months of play is 1825 at RHP. I have posted on the Spirituality Forum. I don ...[text shortened]... wever I did defeat a 1900+ player on my way down playing the longer time controls of G/90, d/5."
Originally posted by divegeesterI have already posted my answer several times. If you really want the answer check back on this forum as well as the Chess Forum. But this type of ad hominem attack doesn't really discredit the truth of the existence of God and His creation no matter how many lies and how dishonest I might have been in the past, because the truth of creation does not stand or fall on my testimony.
Your logic is faultless, but nevertheless I'd like to see him post it. Let's see if he will.
Originally posted by divegeesterSpirituality
That's irrelevant. You make big so called "Christian" claims on this website and I'm calling you on them; in God's sight, in front of your chess and forum peers here, what is your response?
"Debate and general discussion of the supernatural, religion, and the life after." -Russ As well as off topic personal attacks on those whose beliefs, knowledge and skills contrast with my own and trigger my displeasure. Leave it in God's hands.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyNo.
[b]Spirituality
"Debate and general discussion of the supernatural, religion, and the life after." -Russ As well as off topic personal attacks on those whose beliefs, knowledge and skills contrast with my own and trigger my displeasure. Leave it in God's hands.[/b]
Edit: I do politely suggest that if, as you so consistently exclaim, you find this forum and it's members to be so contrary to your personal value system, that you take another one of your over publicised attention seeking sabbaticals.
Originally posted by divegeesterPrinciple worth noting is that nobody succeeds in building their happiness on the unhappiness of others. Why not discuss relevant spirituality topics and issues rather than the real or imagined shortcomings of other Red Hot Pawn Members?
No.
Edit: I do politely suggest that if, as you so consistently exclaim, you find this forum and it's members to be so contrary to your personal value system, that you take another one of your over publicised attention seeking sabbaticals.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThis is a bit rich coming from you, of all people.
Principle worth noting is that nobody succeeds in building their happiness on the unhappiness of others. Why not discuss relevant spirituality topics and issues rather than the real or imagined shortcomings of other Red Hot Pawn Members?
Originally posted by FMF"Red Hot Pawn Terms of Service:
This is a bit rich coming from you, of all people.
6. MEMBER CONDUCT
You agree to not use the Service to:
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable..."