Go back
Cludi Finally Banned

Cludi Finally Banned

Only Chess

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
28 Aug 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Whenever the Site Admins feel like it, which could be in the next minute or never. There's a good possibility that your present account will just be banned.
to be honest that would make the maximum amount of sense, there just is no position to defend, must be boring plying this act at other chess sites. aka the cowardly lion "i'm really innocent" approach. 😵

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
... it seems to me ih8sens stopped using an engine joining chess.com. based on my games there so far, 1900s on chess.com play on roughly the same level as 1600-1700's here.
Wrong, that's a pretty silly, wayward and illogical oversimplification.

i

Joined
28 Aug 08
Moves
0
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

ABC
Siachmat!

Porthmadog

Joined
12 May 06
Moves
17753
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

If you're working so called professionally, then why would you tell these people that you used to play on a chess website, and then afterwards tell them your username?

It's not like they would randomly guess who you were on here.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
Wrong, that's a pretty silly, wayward and illogical oversimplification.
nope, you just didn't understand what was written, as usual.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
28 Aug 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
nope, you just didn't understand what was written, as usual.
Wrong. the profane conclusion that ih8dboy is not using a computer because of his rating and some ad hoc synthetic rating comparison is beyond silly and impossible to prove. In fact his whiny selfish "just here to set the record straight guys" performance would seem to indicate otherwise. and even though you offered up and in spite of the flawed analogy, i agree with your statement.

"but, as is typical for cheaters, he's now looking for an easy way out, getting the banning overturned because of a technicality. one right word from russ would save him from all the tedious & grueling work of actually getting better. unfortunately for him, there is no requirement for the admins to follow any guidelines, nor obligation to overturn their decision for technicalities. it's no cop show from the 80s where the crook gets away because miranda wasn't read to him."

and wormwood your forgot to describe what this "technicality" is, in fact this is false, as there can be no technicality when it has been clearly demonstrated that a chess engine was being used to generate moves.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by eldragonfly
Wrong. the profane conclusion that ih8dboy is not using a computer because of his rating and some ad hoc synthetic rating comparison is beyond silly and impossible to prove. In fact his whiny selfish "just here to set the record straight guys" performance would seem to indicate otherwise. and even though you offered up and in spite of the flawed analogy, ...[text shortened]... s no cop show from the 80s where the crook gets away because miranda wasn't read to him."
like I said, you didn't understand what was written. and I'm not gonna hold your hand until you do, so you can forget your usual nonsense right now.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
28 Aug 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

d

Joined
29 Mar 07
Moves
1260
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
well for one thing, he doesn't use engines and then become a fake chess coach at chess.com.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
28 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
you seem to be entertaining some misguided notion that I've brought up some kind of proof. I haven't. my wording was quite clear on that: "...it seems to me... "

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Now, that's a real 3a banning - all the guy's posts removed, and his name isn't even in the player table.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
Now, [b]that's a real 3a banning - all the guy's posts removed, and his name isn't even in the player table.[/b]
A tad 1984ish, but nice.

D

Joined
01 May 07
Moves
27311
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
A tad 1984ish, but nice.
Just finished reading 1984 today, matter of fact. Great Book.

D

Joined
21 Sep 06
Moves
24552
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
A tad 1984ish, but nice.
I'm sure his actual rating is considerably lower. 😀

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
29 Aug 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by diskamyl
well for one thing, he doesn't use engines and then become a fake chess coach at chess.com.
Having played ih8sens a number of times I doubt he has the ability to become a paid chess professional / coach of any sort.

Even GMs find it difficult if not impossible to actually make a living from chess and I would not pay for ih8sens to coach me nor purchase a book on the Traxler written by him.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.