Go back
KASPAROV RETIRES (not kidding)

KASPAROV RETIRES (not kidding)

Only Chess

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'd read the Linaries put his rating over 2900.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blitz00
It is a shame Kasparov retired. I wish he had played Bobby Fischer. Now that would of been a match to see.
I don't think Fischer is the player he used to be. It wouldn't be a satisfying game.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Drax946
I'd read the Linaries put his rating over 2900.
😲 where did you hear that??? Can it be possible? Shorley the one loss would be enouph to wipe out any gain.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by marinakatomb
😲 where did you hear that??? Can it be possible? Shorley the one loss would be enouph to wipe out any gain.
No it can't be possible. Kasparov's rating as of the last list is 2804. In Linares he performed at +49 or 2853. That doesn't come close to getting him to 2900 although I'm not 100% sure how they go from performance ratings to actual rating changes.

There is no way Kasparov has gained 96 points since the last list which wasn't all that long ago.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Pity GK didn't retire after he cheated against Judit Polgar and then allegedly used his influence to prevent tournament sponsors inviting her . .
He is a truly great chess player, but is he a truly great person?

For the world's most important chess player (Outside RHP) visit
http://www.chessbase.de/2004/manakova/spiegel.jpg
for a look at WGM Maria Manakova

Now I think that face looks very familiar!!
🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blitz00
It is a shame Kasparov retired. I wish he had played Bobby Fischer. Now that would of been a match to see.
I have a feeling Kasparov would have beaten Fischer - as would Karpov.

The real puzzle is why there have been no Americans in the top flight of professional chess for so long. I'm not talking about Russians who emmigrated either - I'm on about people born in America.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jonbeckett73
I have a feeling Kasparov would have beaten Fischer - as would Karpov.

The real puzzle is why there have been no Americans in the top flight of professional chess for so long. I'm not talking about Russians who emmigrated either - I'm on about people born in America.
why is this a puzzle?
why should americans be at the top of chess?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
why is this a puzzle?
why should americans be at the top of chess?
I think the point is why shouldn't they be? why aren't there an U.S. players at least in the mix?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Bye bye Gary - I certainly will miss watching your games :'(

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

It is possible to be less than cynical and say that he is going out before his waning powers bcome more apparent.
But I believe that his ego, gasping for the oxygen of publicity, will demand that he resurface at another tournament in a year or so.

As for Fischer-Karpov, Spassky thinks that Fischer would have won in 1975 and lost in 1978.
Kasparov believes that Fischer would have lost even in 1975.
www.chesscafe.com/text/polgar26.pdf

Vote Up
Vote Down

No matter what, Kasparov will be missed, if only because he was a fighter, and not a bookkeeper, like many of the top grandmasters. People might not like his personality or politics, but he was good for chess, just like Fischer. Unlike Fischer, he (as he says) retains a passion and interest in the game. I don't see how chess will be publicized with the likes of Leko and Kramnik and Anand at the helm. Too bland.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BLReid
I think the point is why shouldn't they be? why aren't there an U.S. players at least in the mix?
I think its because america does not have a chess culture. In russia almost every parent teaches his child chess. This way almost every talent will be discovered. While in the usa not so many children learn the game so their potential talent will not be discovered.

Vote Up
Vote Down

... so we all move a place up in the ranking ;-) hahaha😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I don't think Fischer is the player he used to be. It wouldn't be a satisfying game.
I agree. I even think a lot of IM's could beat Fischer now. He was the man in his time, but his time is long gone.

As for American challengers, I'm telling you. Watch Hikaru Nakamura. He was the youngest ever to achieve master rating (10 years, 2 months), although I'm not sure if that record still holds. He recently won the US Championship, and a lot of GM's think he's stronger now at his age than Bobby was.

I've watched some of his games, including all of them during the US Championship. The kid is amazing. He never gives up, turning draws into wins, and he has a reputation as an phenomenal blitz player (handy when coming up on time controls).

Right now he is in the top 100 players in the world and still very much in development.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
I agree. I even think a lot of IM's could beat Fischer now. He was the man in his time, but his time is long gone.

As for American challengers, I'm telling you. Watch Hikaru Nakamura. He was the youngest ever to achieve master rating (10 years, 2 months), although I'm not sure if that record still holds. He recently won the US Championship, and a ...[text shortened]...

Right now he is in the top 100 players in the world and still very much in development.

I agree he will be a serious challenger in a few years....

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.