Stupid excuses and mindless accusations

Originally posted by RahimK
NO, why don't you match your moves to any engine and then you get back to me.


After all, you claim that he is cheating and we are suppose to prove he is not cheating. This is really stupid logic, but besides that, we proved he is not cheating.

Now why don't you step up the plate and back up your cheating accusation.

There's like 5 of us against you. Clearly your wrong. Clearly, Clearly.

Seeing as im the most expereinced player here, i think your all just going on wrong data. When the admins get around to telling me its not a cheater, i'll accept that. To listen to a bunch of 1500's makes no sense. Someone posted what they thought was a cheater, and i chimed in whith what im convinced is a cheater. If someone wins that many games in a row, they are either a strong player with a high elo, or a cheater. I would like to see this persons elo. Then i will admit my mistake. When i see moves i think are A.I, i say something.

Originally posted by masscat
Given the strength of even freeware engines, will somebody please tell me how you can be using an engine and still be rated under 2200?!

Using the engine for only struggling times as in a tournament. Using the engine intermittently, not all the time, because you know if your rating all of the sudden jumps from 1500 to 2000 in three months, something is up. Not possible. Not even with de la maza.

Originally posted by Grandmouster
Seeing as im the most expereinced player here, i think your all just going on wrong data. When the admins get around to telling me its not a cheater, i'll accept that. To listen to a bunch of 1500's makes no sense. Someone posted what they thought was a cheater, and i chimed in whith what im convinced is a cheater. If someone wins that many games in a r ...[text shortened]... persons elo. Then i will admit my mistake. When i see moves i think are A.I, i say something.

Where has he won lots of games in a row? You don't make any sense.

Just because you have played a lot of games doesn't make your opinion the most valid. I have played in many chess tournaments, including a few prestigeous ones. I can back up my point,so far you haven't except pointing out some thread which still does not explain the moves you believe to be cheating.

Originally posted by prosoccer
Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I ...[text shortened]... almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...

Looks fishy to me prosoccer after reviewing the game. Looks like you both were playing above your rating on RHP. You were even playing better though. But, sometimes a player can be in the 1300s and have performance ratings in the 1800s. I've seen it. It's very possible. That's why it's difficult to catch intermittent cheaters on RHP. A person who is an administrator on here - who will go nameless of course - told me this. It's difficult to catch intermittent cheating on RHP. So, basically you have to just bite the bullet and realize your rating could be a little lower on the internet with all the opening books, databases, computer engines, etc... If someone tells me that a person who is in a 2 round tournament - only needing to knock out this one difficult guy to win the tournament cup on his profile - won't use an engine, I'll tell them their stupid if they don't think the likelihood is very great on the internet! But, I've decided why worry about it. It's only just a game. 🙂 If you're honest, it pays off in the end, maybe in the rating you achieve in true OTB tournaments. 🙂

Originally posted by powershaker
Looks fishy to me prosoccer after reviewing the game. Looks like you both were playing above your rating on RHP. You were even playing better though. But, sometimes a player can be in the 1300s and have performance ratings in the 1800s. I've seen it. It's very possible. That's why it's difficult to catch intermittent cheaters on RHP. A person who ...[text shortened]... , it pays off in the end, maybe in the rating you achieve in true OTB tournaments. 🙂

You think that is playing well above their level? Truly your RHP grade is the one you deserve.

You are truly a purveyor of bad chess.

Originally posted by welsharnie
Where has he won lots of games in a row? You don't make any sense.

Just because you have played a lot of games doesn't make your opinion the most valid. I have played in many chess tournaments, including a few prestigeous ones. I can back up my point,so far you haven't except pointing out some thread which still does not explain the moves you believe to be cheating.

what game are you looking at????
40 in a row is not a lot!!!????
Why am i arguing with a lampost?

Originally posted by Grandmouster
Seeing as im the most expereinced player here, i think your all just going on wrong data. When the admins get around to telling me its not a cheater, i'll accept that. To listen to a bunch of 1500's makes no sense. Someone posted what they thought was a cheater, and i chimed in whith what im convinced is a cheater. If someone wins that many games in a r ...[text shortened]... persons elo. Then i will admit my mistake. When i see moves i think are A.I, i say something.

You're the most experienced player here? Bless your cotton socks, how wrong could you be. You really want to look at peoples profiles before you start to mouth off. By your own words your 1800 on ICC, your 1700 (just checked...1615) something or other on here, you dont know jack about engines and you are having woos about being class A a few times.

ICC ratings are normally 200-300 points over national ratings. Do you have a USCF rating for example?

Originally posted by powershaker
Looks fishy to me prosoccer after reviewing the game. Looks like you both were playing above your rating on RHP. You were even playing better though. But, sometimes a player can be in the 1300s and have performance ratings in the 1800s. I've seen it. It's very possible. That's why it's difficult to catch intermittent cheaters on RHP. A person who ...[text shortened]... , it pays off in the end, maybe in the rating you achieve in true OTB tournaments. 🙂

I don't know about that, the opening moves for the sicilian
for white were not followed very well, especially move 7, NXN. That
just makes things easier for black. And Nc3 earlier is not usual book
either. All in all it was a game of 1300's no more no less.

Originally posted by RahimK
I'm getting sick with this. We proved to you why we think no one is using an engine. Now you prove to us that they are using an engine. Geez!

We need someone like Ravello, Xant... to give you some words of wisdom.

Thanks for the callout but there's no need for a chess genius to see that no engines were involved in this game.

The game has been played bad from both sides and I think Black is just a sore loser who can't find a better excuse for the fact that his play was worse than White's.

A quick example:why the heck white moves 16.Qh5 instead of the simple and better Ne4?
For not speaking of White missing the immediate piece capture with 18.Qxc5........

As I said,Black is only just a sore loser and this thread shouldn't even be six-pages-long.

Originally posted by Grandmouster
i see, so you have played over 100,000 games on the net, and OTB. WOW!!! at such a young age too!
I only have been playing for the last 10 years, in many tournaments at the Former Manhattan Chess Club, and The Marshall Chess Club.
The Village Chess Shop
Played most of the chess hustlers in Washington Square park.
Got Lessons from GM Lombardy, and F ...[text shortened]... GM's FM's Senior Masters, and NM's
and on..and on...
Stop pissing on my leg....little dog.

All that and you were still the lowest rated player out of the 5 people( welsharnie ,dottewell, myself, RahimK and you) in that discussion. Its relates to the topic you talk about in your chess group website, when you wondered why 8 year olds had better ratings than you and went on to be future masters at a young age. After reading your last post I think I might be able to aid...since you just said you had all that training and all those games etc etc etc and even after all that you're still worse than most chess players who do put in a little bit of study and effort......the answer to why the children have higher ratings than you is......that you're dense.


Anyone with a playchess account can play masters day in day out it doesnt mean anything, I lost to Yasser Seiravan a few months ago....hes 74in the world, losing to him doesnt make my ranking any higher.

Originally posted by Grandmouster
i see, so you have played over 100,000 games on the net, and OTB. WOW!!! at such a young age too!
I only have been playing for the last 10 years, in many tournaments at the Former Manhattan Chess Club, and The Marshall Chess Club.
The Village Chess Shop
Played most of the chess hustlers in Washington Square park.
Got Lessons from GM Lombardy, and F ...[text shortened]... other Masters.
Played Blitz with Many GM's FM's Senior Masters, and NM's
and on..and on...

I've played 7,056,001 online games in the past 70 years. I've also played 15,657,890 OTB games in that time.

I've beaten no less than 10 grandmasters in under 10 moves. Blindfolded. Giving them queen odds.

I can bench 350lbs, run the mile in 2.5 minutes, and climb everest from Base Camp to the top in 1 day.

I was actually the first person on the moon, but then NASA kidnapped me and brainwashed me into forgetting, cos they wanted an american to have that privilege.

I invented the wheel, and just like you, it seems, my crap doesn't smell either.

🙄

D

Originally posted by Grandmouster
what game are you looking at????
40 in a row is not a lot!!!????
Why am i arguing with a lampost?

Well, you have my agreement there, 40 in a row is a lot.














Especially for someone who has only won 25 games in total on this site.

Originally posted by whitedeerwithnohorns
All that and you were still the lowest rated player out of the 5 people( welsharnie ,dottewell, myself, RahimK and you) in that discussion. Its relates to the topic you talk about in your chess group website, when you wondered why 8 year olds had better ratings than you and went on to be future masters at a young age. After reading your last po ...[text shortened]... avan a few months ago....hes 74in the world, losing to him doesnt make my ranking any higher.

My rating here=1615 Your rating =1531.? what the hell are you on?
I dont need to argue with the trolls here.
My point is made. its in the hands of the admins.
I see this post is attracting the usual assortment of loonys and flamers.
Last post by me

Originally posted by Grandmouster
i see, so you have played over 100,000 games on the net, and OTB. WOW!!! at such a young age too!
I only have been playing for the last 10 years, in many tournaments at the Former Manhattan Chess Club, and The Marshall Chess Club.
The Village Chess Shop
Played most of the chess hustlers in Washington Square park.
Got Lessons from GM Lombardy, and F ...[text shortened]... GM's FM's Senior Masters, and NM's
and on..and on...
Stop pissing on my leg....little dog.

I have been playing for 8 years. I have had lessons with IM's. Beaten IM's in rapidplay games, and drawn with them in longplay games, both OTB. I have played blitz with some very strong players, including a very strong GM.

I may not have played 100,000 games, especially over only 10 years. That is an average of over 25 games a day! I personally would rather have a bit more variety in my life.