Go back
Two Knights or Giuoco Piano?

Two Knights or Giuoco Piano?

Only Chess

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
01 Nov 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
You can also try 5. ... b5 as I did in Game 3485180 and Game 4030313.

It avoids the main lines and seems to give interesting play.

Edit: In case anyones wondering I gave the draw in the 2nd game as I wanted to give up the seige board. I think at the end I had enough of an advantage to probably win.
Ah....5...b5 The Ulvestad Variation. White here should play 6.Bf1! when play can transpose into the Fritz varaition after 6.Bf1 Nd4.

Good Choice DF 😉

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by najdorfslayer
Ah....5...b5 The Ulvestad Variation. White here should play 6.Bf1! when play can transpose into the Fritz varaition after 6.Bf1 Nd4.

Good Choice DF 😉
Agreed, but neither of my opponents played 6. Bf1 and it is likely that the majority will be reluctant to retreat the B.

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
3. ... Nf6 is more aggressive and gives black better winning chances.

whereas

3. ... Bc5 is solid, boring and drawish.

Play the former to win, the latter to draw.
I think both lines can lead to exciting games - the problem is that it's up to white. Either way he can keep it quiet (e.g. 4. d3)

U

19th hole

Joined
07 Mar 07
Moves
32955
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
You can also try 5. ... b5 as I did in Game 3485180 and Game 4030313.

It avoids the main lines and seems to give interesting play.

Edit: In case anyones wondering I gave the draw in the 2nd game as I wanted to give up the seige board. I think at the end I had enough of an advantage to probably win.
At the very worst you had a draw in our game. I put the position into my computer and it was drawn, but that is assuming I play the endgame up to your strength. 😉

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
01 Nov 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just found a fun OTB game I played in my local league over 5 yrs ago in the Two Knights

If anyone cares 🙂

I have removed the names to protect the dignity of my opponent (Who's rating is about 1900)


[C59]: Two Knights: 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 5.Bb5+ c6 6.dxc6 bxc6 7.Be2
My Local League, 04.02.2002

1.e4 e5
2.Bc4 Nf6
3.Nf3 Nc6
4.Ng5 d5
5.exd5 Na5
6.Bb5+ c6
7.dxc6 bxc6
8.Be2 h6
9.Nf3 e4
10.Ne5 Bd6
11.Ng4 0-0
12.Nc3 Re8
13.0-0 Nxg4
14.Bxg4 Qh4
15.h3 f5
16.Be2 Re6
17.d4 Rg6
18.Kh1 f4
19.Nxe4 Bxh3
20.g3 fxg3
0-1

A
Dark Matter

Maastricht

Joined
26 Jul 05
Moves
28572
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by najdorfslayer
Ah....5...b5 The Ulvestad Variation. White here should play 6.Bf1! when play can transpose into the Fritz varaition after 6.Bf1 Nd4.

Good Choice DF 😉
Euh... Fritz actually made up his own variation???
Impressive computer chess these days 😕

Do you guys really encounter many Italian games? In OTB play I use e5 as a weapon against people who play the Sicilian better than myself, but I get Spanish and Scottisch only.

I'm used to 3. ...-Bc5 in the Italian and thought 4. 0-0 was theory there, but it probably doesn't really matter in which order you play.

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Asthereal
Euh... Fritz actually made up his own variation???
Impressive computer chess these days 😕

Do you guys really encounter many Italian games? In OTB play I use e5 as a weapon against people who play the Sicilian better than myself, but I get Spanish and Scottisch only.

I'm used to 3. ...-Bc5 in the Italian and thought 4. 0-0 was theory there, but it probably doesn't really matter in which order you play.
The two main moves after

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 are

a) 4.c3 (Whit can then ain to play either d4 or d3)
b) 4,b4 (The Evams Gambit)

4.0-0 is not very ambitious at all here Black can simply play 4...Nf6 or 4...d6.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

'Particularly 4.Ng5 which Short has recently said White simply wins a pawn!! '

Where can I view Short's analysis? Can you post a link?

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
'Particularly 4.Ng5 which Short has recently said White simply wins a pawn!! '

Where can I view Short's analysis? Can you post a link?
I heard this from a very good source (a guy at my club who is in the know)......I will probe him further to tell me where he heard it!

Then I will tell you 😉

P.S. I hope it's all nonsense too!

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
01 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by najdorfslayer
I heard this from a very good source (a guy at my club who is in the know)......I will probe him further to tell me where he heard it!

Then I will tell you 😉

P.S. I hope it's all nonsense too!
Not so sure it is nonsense. I seem to do very well with the Fried Liver Attack.

RN
RHP Prophet

pursuing happiness

Joined
22 Feb 06
Moves
13669
Clock
01 Nov 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ih8sens
Actually... Wilkes, Barre, and Traxler all thought it to be objectively sound and with most engines (EVEN after Bxf7+) the game is judged to be equal by about the 13-15th move.

I'd say with perfect play the line draws after Bxf7+ and wins for black after Nxf7.

If you'd like a game as white I'd be happy to play you 🙂.



I regret now not keeping ev ...[text shortened]... erated over the past few months regarding this opening... it would have made a great book 😛.
I'd love to see that research. It was obvious to me when we were playing that you had done a lot!

You played and talked about some lines I hadn't seen before.

You had me in our game with you as black. Qh4+ was winning I'm pretty sure.

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
02 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
'Particularly 4.Ng5 which Short has recently said White simply wins a pawn!! '

Where can I view Short's analysis? Can you post a link?
I think he was talking about the line that is the most common at the top level:

1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. Ng5 d5
5. exd5 Na5
6. Bb5 c6
7. dxc6 bxc6

Black sacrifices a pawn for the initiative. Short reckons it isn't worth it. See, for example, http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1429125

(I often just play 6...Bd7 and avoid the sacrifice)

f

Atlanta

Joined
10 Apr 05
Moves
9033
Clock
02 Nov 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

f

Atlanta

Joined
10 Apr 05
Moves
9033
Clock
02 Nov 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dejection
Oh yeah, i used to play that, but i stopped when everybody at my chess club kept play Bb6 declining the gambit
That's hilarious since declining the Evan's with Bb6 is almost a forced loss. You don't play over classical games do you? Look up 'Pawn Roller" on the internet. They are almost all Bb6 Evans Gambits. They are all pretty short 🙂

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
02 Nov 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by fluffymop
That's hilarious since declining the Evan's with Bb6 is almost a forced loss. You don't play over classical games do you? Look up 'Pawn Roller" on the internet. They are almost all Bb6 Evans Gambits. They are all pretty short 🙂
Since that's the top scoring line at GM level (according to the Shredder database - 57% for black), that sounds highly unlikely. Which line is supposed to be a forced win for white?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.