Go back
2+2=5

2+2=5

Posers and Puzzles

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
06 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by smw6869
Dear Fabian, I have never experienced the euclidial division algorithm position. How many repititions? Over and over again? For how long? Gracious sakes, i must change my diapers. Later, king of the 50's rock and roll era.

Granny.
You use the euclidian division algorithm whenever you divide 'by hand'. Try to divide 1/3 using pencil and paper you see that you go into a repetition quite instantly, and you realize that you can fill in the threes as long as you like.

Those of you who don't know the euclidian division algorithm - google it.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
06 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Using the euclidian division algoritm, as you do when you divide manually without any calculator, it is easily seen that the proof is unneccesary. Prform the algoritm and you'll see by yourself.
I should have used Fabian's argument at Uni .. life would have been so much easier!

"... it is easily seen that the proof is unneccesary."

s
Granny

Parts Unknown

Joined
19 Jan 07
Moves
73159
Clock
06 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
You use the euclidian division algorithm whenever you divide 'by hand'. Try to divide 1/3 using pencil and paper you see that you go into a repetition quite instantly, and you realize that you can fill in the threes as long as you like.

Those of you who don't know the euclidian division algorithm - google it.
Oh Fabian darling, i shall try the algorithm "by hand", but only till i get the repetitions down correctly then i hope you will show me the more advanced form, in person maybe. Just thinking of those Rock & Roll hands of yours makes me .......oops.

Granny.

A

Joined
13 Sep 06
Moves
11905
Clock
07 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
You snuck in an extra +1 in the fourth step without including it's partner -1. This is incorrect.
but is it? theoretically it goes on infinitely so why can't i do that?

If you had an infinite series you could stop after any term. so technically I haven't done anything wrong.

AThousandYoung
He didn't...Diddy?

tinyurl.com/2p9w6j3b

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26701
Clock
07 Oct 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
but is it? theoretically it goes on infinitely so why can't i do that?

If you had an infinite series you could stop after any term. so technically I haven't done anything wrong.
The ... implies that the pattern repeats. The pattern with more +1's than -1's is different than the pattern with equal amounts of both.

The decimal definition of pi cannot be stopped after any term. Isn't it an infinite series?

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
08 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
how about this to prove 1=0
0= 0 + 0 + 0 + . . .
0= (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + . . .
0= 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + . . .
0= 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + . . .
0= 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + . . .= 1
This is not a proof, as we all know already.

First - what does ... means? It means that there is a repetition of a pattern infinit number of times. It doesn't have an end.

So when I see the expression of 1-1+1-1+... I see this as a limit with n numbers of term and n approaching infinity.

Does this limit has a value? No, of course not. There are no last term. Using this expression as if it has a value you can easily "prove" that 1=0.

T
Kupikupopo!

Out of my mind

Joined
25 Oct 02
Moves
20443
Clock
08 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
If you had an infinite series you could stop after any term.
No! It's an infinite series, so you HAVE to go on!

t

not quite sure.help!

Joined
23 Nov 06
Moves
2032
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
How do you know its repeated forever?

The whole point of mathematical proof is its VIGOUR!
the reason that numbers and mathematical proof is vigour is because they go on infinitely. this is why we use numbers as time because they can be easily repeated and will continue on no matter what. if you can give me the highest number in the world known, ill gladly take it and add 1 to make it bigger.

Aniways id like to move on to pi. does anybody know any puzzles that include pi? i like pie.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tournymangr
Aniways id like to move on to pi. does anybody know any puzzles that include pi? i like pie.
Rhubarb pie with a ball of vanilla ice with pecans and a nice hot vanilla sauce, that's what I like!

t

not quite sure.help!

Joined
23 Nov 06
Moves
2032
Clock
10 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Rhubarb pie with a ball of vanilla ice with pecans and a nice hot vanilla sauce, that's what I like!
mmmmm....that sounds really good!! i think ill go and have some apple pie right now cuz i dont have any rhubarb 🙁

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
10 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tournymangr
mmmmm....that sounds really good!! i think ill go and have some apple pie right now cuz i dont have any rhubarb 🙁
I like round pies, and for fun I divide its diameter with its circumference, and get another pie.😵

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tournymangr
the reason that numbers and mathematical proof is vigour is because they go on infinitely. this is why we use numbers as time because they can be easily repeated and will continue on no matter what. if you can give me the highest number in the world known, ill gladly take it and add 1 to make it bigger.

Aniways id like to move on to pi. does anybody know any puzzles that include pi? i like pie.
My favourite is

http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=72379

AThousandYoung
He didn't...Diddy?

tinyurl.com/2p9w6j3b

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26701
Clock
17 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
This is not a proof, as we all know already.

First - what does ... means? It means that there is a repetition of a pattern infinit number of times. It doesn't have an end.

So when I see the expression of 1-1+1-1+... I see this as a limit with n numbers of term and n approaching infinity.

Does this limit has a value? No, of course not. There are no last term. Using this expression as if it has a value you can easily "prove" that 1=0.
Ah, excellent point.

A

Joined
13 Sep 06
Moves
11905
Clock
17 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tournymangr
does anyone no the .99=1?? i do🙂
IF you look at .99... as the Series E(sigma)9/(10^n)
E 9/(10^n) = 9 E (1/10)^n
It is a geomentric series so the sum of the series is a/(1-r)
9*((1/10)/(1-1/10)= 9*(1/10)(10/9) = 9*(1/9) = 9/9 = 1
.99... = 1

e

Joined
29 Jan 07
Moves
3612
Clock
23 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
IF you look at .99... as the Series E(sigma)9/(10^n)
E 9/(10^n) = 9 E (1/10)^n
It is a geomentric series so the sum of the series is a/(1-r)
9*((1/10)/(1-1/10)= 9*(1/10)(10/9) = 9*(1/9) = 9/9 = 1
.99... = 1
is this your chat up line?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.