15 Dec 04
Originally posted by STANGThe longer you wait, the more chance there is for others to find it out and post it for free. YOu can always see that the idea is your becuse you posted it BFORE others did. No rec's will be gained for this.
As I've already said ...
Honestly, I'm not prepared to share my discovery without setting it up so that there's a large number of people who recognise the discovery as mine.
16 Dec 04
Originally posted by TheMaster37Give a chance to cheskmate too, who too seems to have found the trick independently.
The longer you wait, the more chance there is for others to find it out and post it for free. YOu can always see that the idea is your becuse you posted it BFORE others did. No rec's will be gained for this.
17 Dec 04
Originally posted by fearlessleaderLet this thread die its natural death. FOR, Iamatigre 's post above and the example given by him has already demonstrated that the so called trick of STANG is a sham and a joke.
there STANG, now you have a challenge!
either show us your maraculus trick, or admit that you just made it up, or admit that you were wrong and show why.
21 Dec 04
3 edits
Originally posted by iamatigerHere is another example which exposes STANG and rubbishes his claim of having found some EUREKA kind of a thing.
Ok, I thought of 10 - squared it: 100 - removed 1 and 0, now my number is gone, not even zero, I don't know how I can alter it whatever the next step is!
I rec'd you by the way - I'm just tooooo easy with recs 🙂
I take the number 18. sum of the digits is 9. Square of 9 is 81. I delete 1 and 8 occuring in number. Now my original number is gone. Nothing left.......What left to do next.
Another example . Take the number 33. Sum of digits is 6. Square of 6 is 36. Digit 3 occurs in the sqared number as obtained above, and I delete the digits 3 ocurring in the original number. Again nothing is left.
A third example. Take 111111111. Sum of digits is 9. Square of 9 is 81.
Digit 1 occurs in it.So I delete the 1's occuring in the original number and again nothing is left. So....That more than shows the faux pas of STANG's false EUREKA as well as the mystery of the his weasel-ly-ness.
21 Dec 04
Originally posted by ranjan sinhaunless that is the trick itself.
Here is another example which exposes STANG and rubbishes his claim of having found some EUREKA kind of a thing.
I take the number 18. sum of the digits is 9. Square of 9 is 81. I delete 1 and 8 occuring in number. Now my original number is gone. Nothing left.......What left to do next.
Another example . Take the number 33. S ...[text shortened]... e faux pas of STANG's false EUREKA as well as the mystery of the his weasel-ly-ness.
maby any number if this proses is repeated long enough will always dissappear.
27 Dec 04
Originally posted by fearlessleaderI would need only 20 recs to tell all the steps , unlike STANG who avowedly needs 10 recs each for revealing each step. And people have already given 9 recs on his first post in this thread.So far I have got 1 rec on my first post in this thread. I need 19 more to reveal all..
if you know it, then tell us.
(please.)