19 Nov 04
Originally posted by STANGSTANG uses his rec count to prop up his pretty lame debating skills.
Hoestly, I'm not prepared to share my discovery without setting it up so that there's a large number of people who recognise the discovery as mine.
Quote:'50 recs around the election period tends to confirm that people agree ... '
Around election time, he spammed the debates forum with the same 1 line message about 100 times, and some dope went along and recced 50odd of them.
D
- Joined
- 26 Apr 03
- Moves
- 26771
20 Nov 04
Originally posted by STANGOk, I thought of 10 - squared it: 100 - removed 1 and 0, now my number is gone, not even zero, I don't know how I can alter it whatever the next step is!
It really is amazing how paranoid you all are when you only have to click the Recommend button on my first post ...
OK, the next step is to modify the number you started with by removing any digits that also exist in the square number you just calculated.
e.g. Start with 123. Digits add up to 6. Square 6 = 36. 36 has a 3 in it which means you would remov ...[text shortened]... y, George Bush is a liar and a war monger. George Bush is a threat to the security of the world.
I rec'd you by the way - I'm just tooooo easy with recs 🙂
21 Nov 04
Originally posted by iamatigerthere STANG, now you have a challenge!
Ok, I thought of 10 - squared it: 100 - removed 1 and 0, now my number is gone, not even zero, I don't know how I can alter it whatever the next step is!
I rec'd you by the way - I'm just tooooo easy with recs 🙂
either show us your maraculus trick, or admit that you just made it up, or admit that you were wrong and show why.
28 Nov 04
3 edits
Originally posted by fearlessleaderThe week-long mysterious silence of STANG is perhaps ,in itself , the eloquent description of his miraculous game of tricks. Eh?
there STANG, now you have a challenge!
either show us your maraculus trick, or admit that you just made it up, or admit that you were wrong and show why.
30 Nov 04
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGHow many rec's have you earned by parroting this nauseating stuff about Bush, time and again?
My opening post only has 4 recommendations. That aint enough from you paranoid folk.
By the way, George Bush is a liar and a war monger. George Bush, and those who support him, are a threat to the security of the world.
Even in a thread which has nothing to do with
nauseating politics?
And why are you silent on the genuine point raised by Iamatigre and the inevitable challenge of fearlessleader?
30 Nov 04
Originally posted by cheskmateI stipulated the conditions and explained why they were necessary. That's it.
How many rec's have you earned by parroting this nauseating stuff about Bush, time and again?
Even in a thread which has nothing to do with
nauseating politics?
And why are you silent on the genuine point raised by Iamatigre and the inevitable challenge of fearlessleader?
30 Nov 04
Originally posted by STANGLet me tell you how recommendations work.
I stipulated the conditions and explained why they were necessary. That's it.
You post something cool, we give recommendations so that others come and see what kind of cool thing you posted.
Notice the orders of actions? FIRST you post something cool, THEN we recommend the post. Not the other way around.
30 Nov 04
Originally posted by STANGand then we all explained why they weren't nessesary.
I stipulated the conditions and explained why they were necessary. That's it.
if your concerned with the sicurity of your increasingly dubious "discovery", then right it down, put it in a sealed envolope, mail it to yourself priority-mail, sign for it, and then don't open it.
this is assuming that you live in the us, but i assume most places have an ewuivilant.