Go back
Clan System Request for Proposals

Clan System Request for Proposals

Site Ideas

Startreader

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
326101
Clock
20 Jan 17

Originally posted by roma45
Been more than a few days now
Why did he wait until he's busy? Should have started this last January when the collusion started
Or like football chairman making promises as season ticket s are due ?
See if the collusion is sorted I doubt it as it's already happening again
No doubt this message will vanish but the one where I am called a dick gets to stay
Yes, but the message shouldn't vanish, should it? And the colluding clans should never have been enabled to get away with it...and much more...for so long. *sigh*

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
20 Jan 17

Originally posted by Startreader
Yes, but the message shouldn't vanish, should it? And the colluding clans should never have been enabled to get away with it...and much more...for so long. *sigh*
And it looks like the collusion will continue unabated till something is done to send a message.

Carrobie took one look at the 2017 clan table, saw Metallica off to a good start and immediately went back to the well !!

This after announcing to the clan community that he was relinquishing the leadership of his clan.

Says a lot about him and his own personal obsessions.
Improvements to the clan feature should be driven by imagination and constructive ideas.
Not by someone's own personal demons !!

Blood On The Tracks

Joined
11 Nov 14
Moves
34223
Clock
20 Jan 17

roma45
st johnstone

Joined
14 Nov 09
Moves
428954
Clock
20 Jan 17

The post that was quoted here has been removed
just shows me the collusion brigade are getting nervous, bringing out their sock puppet in a rather pathetic attempt to bait me.

collusion points will be removed,
my last response to you in here you might want an abuse session to deflect from the collusion not going to happen, bye bye socky

Blood On The Tracks

Joined
11 Nov 14
Moves
34223
Clock
20 Jan 17
1 edit

Russ
RHP Code Monkey

RHP HQ

Joined
21 Feb 01
Moves
2451
Clock
21 Jan 17

From Monday a few quick fixes will be going up. I know everyone is impatient for change, but there are other competing priorities right now.

All 2017 results will be recalculated when any new system is implemented.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121653
Clock
22 Jan 17

This is going to be like that final scene in Looper where the young version shoots himself and the older version subsequently disappears. Carrobie you could have your whole rhp history deleted in a sort of retro-karma.

roma45
st johnstone

Joined
14 Nov 09
Moves
428954
Clock
22 Jan 17

Originally posted by Russ
From Monday a few quick fixes will be going up. I know everyone is impatient for change, but there are other competing priorities right now.

All 2017 results will be recalculated when any new system is implemented.
should be interesting, i assume the 2016 collusion points will also be adjusted accordingly?

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
22 Jan 17
1 edit

Originally posted by Russ
From Monday a few quick fixes will be going up. I know everyone is impatient for change, but there are other competing priorities right now.

All 2017 results will be recalculated when any new system is implemented.
Will there be any decision on a penalty (or no penalty) on the 2016 results ?

I had suggested 3 possible outcomes on a response from site:
1 - penalty issued to clans participating in 2016 fiasco. This would take form of points rollback and/or clan suspensions.
2 - leave the clan standings as they are but apply a footnote stating that some results are dubious in nature. An asterisk beside certain clans would be suggested. 2015 clan table was also brought up.
3 - a response saying no further action will be taken.

While option 3 is a not a desired outcome, it is still better than silence !!
And it may ease the high level of dissatisfaction present in the clan community !!

Thanks.

Mctayto
Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1044954
Clock
22 Jan 17

Originally posted by mghrn55
Will there be any decision on a penalty (or no penalty) on the 2016 results ?

I had suggested 3 possible outcomes on a response from site:
1 - penalty issued to clans participating in 2016 fiasco. This would take form of points rollback and/or clan suspensions.
2 - leave the clan standings as they are but apply a footnote stating that some results are ...[text shortened]...
And it may ease the high level of dissatisfaction present in the clan community !!

Thanks.
I think all the results from 2010 through 2015 should be looked at and at very least an asterisk denoting dubious results/play by metallica year after year 😛 😛 😛

my2sons
Retired

Virginia

Joined
02 Aug 07
Moves
85083
Clock
22 Jan 17

One thing is for sure, as soon as Russ limits clans from playing each other no more than once or twice every 6 months, Easy Riders is going to be in a world of hurt not being able to play their 3 sister clans multiple times a month, month after month after month. 😀

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
23 Jan 17
2 edits

Originally posted by Mctayto
I think all the results from 2010 through 2015 should be looked at and at very least an asterisk denoting dubious results/play by metallica year after year 😛 😛 😛
The Easy Riders won. They lost. All our challenges are within the site rules. They make up their own rules and call people cheats and make vile insinuations they cannot substantiate when others do not comply with their made up rules. They have used this most important thread as platform for vilifying others who do not comply to their made up rules. They are nothing but a bunch of disgruntled bad losers most of them too dim to understand some excellent proposals that would have made the clan system more fairer for all.

roma45
st johnstone

Joined
14 Nov 09
Moves
428954
Clock
23 Jan 17

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The Easy Riders won. They lost. All our challenges are within the site rules. They make up their own rules and call people cheats and make vile insinuations they cannot substantiate when others do not comply with their made up rules. They have used this most important thread as platform for vilifying others who do not comply to their made up rule ...[text shortened]... to understand some excellent proposals that would have made the clan system more fairer for all.
tongue in cheek?
drunk?
you seriously don't believe you actually won fairly?

shortcircuit
master of disaster

funny farm

Joined
28 Jan 07
Moves
103434
Clock
23 Jan 17
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The Easy Riders won. They lost. All our challenges are within the site rules. They make up their own rules and call people cheats and make vile insinuations they cannot substantiate when others do not comply with their made up rules. They have used this most important thread as platform for vilifying others who do not comply to their made up rule ...[text shortened]... to understand some excellent proposals that would have made the clan system more fairer for all.
waffle

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
23 Jan 17

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The Easy Riders won. They lost. All our challenges are within the site rules. They make up their own rules and call people cheats and make vile insinuations they cannot substantiate when others do not comply with their made up rules. They have used this most important thread as platform for vilifying others who do not comply to their made up rule ...[text shortened]... to understand some excellent proposals that would have made the clan system more fairer for all.
Strategic Ultimatum didn't break any "site rules" either. 😴

I asked Russ for a ruling and I said I would accept site decision one way or another.
I have also contributed ideas to this forum and listened to ideas from Moonbus and GiannottI and others.

You have whined about sandbagging and tried to shoot other people's ideas down if you didn't like them.

Why are you still squawking ?? 😴

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.