15 Aug 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadHow much of anything is 100%?
Yes, intuition is what we use when we lack solid evidence.
[b]In other words, your intuition is able to override any evidence you don't want to agree with...
Not true at all. I never said anything about my intuition overriding evidence.
... or look at if that evidence is able to prove I was not making any of this up...
I actually asked you to provide the evidence, but you decided to side step it.[/b]
What does your intuition tell you? Or do you know the answer?
15 Aug 14
Originally posted by lemon limeSorry to say, but a lack of voices disagreeing with you does not equal implicit agreement. If that were the case, RJHinds could claim that all theists agree with him in quite a number of threads where he has gone ignored by theists. Can I take it that you agree with him in all the threads that he has posted in that you haven't responded to?
That's because not a single poster (who believes what the Bible says) has so far disagreed with the premise that angels have free will, or has disagreed with anything I've said about Lucifer/Satan. So ask yourself, given the fact that people (who believe what the Bible says) can disagree on so many other points, why do we seem to be in agreement on this one point?
If you want to claim someone agrees with you, get them to actually post something to that effect.
15 Aug 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadI agree with everything lemon lime says.
Sorry to say, but a lack of voices disagreeing with you does not equal implicit agreement. If that were the case, RJHinds could claim that all theists agree with him in quite a number of threads where he has gone ignored by theists. Can I take it that you agree with him in all the threads that he has posted in that you haven't responded to?
If you want to claim someone agrees with you, get them to actually post something to that effect.
16 Aug 14
On the first page of this thread I said:
"I didn't believe this question would pose a difficulty for most Christians, but I was curious to see if there would be any disagreement or not."
I was referring to disagreement among Christians. It wasn't necessary to make that clear, but I can see now how it could have been interpreted as an invitation for anyone not familiar with the subject matter to weigh in.
This was never meant to be a Bible study for atheists and trolls, but I see now that someone has decided to start up his own Bible study. Now they can talk among themselves without bothering us, or being bothered by us...
pffft... yeah, like that's ever going to happen!