Originally posted by Rajk999oh dear,
Luke 10: 7 .. GO [b]NOT FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE.
Do the JWs ever stay to eat and drink in a house and follow Christ NOT TO GO FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE?[/b]
go not from house to house;
as if fickle and inconstant, as if not satisfied with your lodging and entertainment, and as seeking out for other and better, or as if burdensome where they were
http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/luke-10-7.html
so we find that the verse is not an imperative command that they should not actually go from house to house preaching and teaching but that they should not be fickle and inconsistent about their lodging, excellent, such a view harmonizes with the passage in its immediate context and the Bible as a whole, your interpretation contradicts the passage in its immediate context and the Bible as a whole. Ouch! yo busted again Raj. Why do you mess with me?
23 Jan 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe point about all of this is the following if you are able to understand as your brains is already damaged by Watchtower foolishness ..
oh dear,
go not from house to house;
as if fickle and inconstant, as if not satisfied with your lodging and entertainment, and as seeking out for other and better, or as if burdensome where they were
http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/luke-10-7.html
so we find that the verse is not an imperative com ...[text shortened]... mmediate context and the Bible as a whole. Ouch! yo busted again Raj. Why do you mess with me?
Its NOT about house to house which you constantly boast about. Its about preaching the good news about Christ and the Kingdom to come , doctrines which you people have twisted.
Whats the point of going house to house and preaching garbage? You dont know who Jesus Christ really is.
Originally posted by Rajk999You lose Rajboy, now take your medicine, our work is sanctioned by the scriptures, we are carrying on the work that the Christ and the apostles did and our message is the Kingdom of God and Christ the messiah, i don't know why you are so bitter about it.
The point about all of this is the following if you are able to understand as your brains is already damaged by Watchtower foolishness ..
Its NOT about house to house which you constantly boast about. Its about preaching the good news about Christ and the Kingdom to come , doctrines which you people have twisted.
Whats the point of going house to house and preaching garbage? You dont know who Jesus Christ really is.
In order to know Jesus you must do the things he commanded.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre these words in the Bible?
oh dear,
go not from house to house;
as if fickle and inconstant, as if not satisfied with your lodging and entertainment, and as seeking out for other and better, or as if burdensome where they were
http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/luke-10-7.html
so we find that the verse is not an imperative com ...[text shortened]... mmediate context and the Bible as a whole. Ouch! yo busted again Raj. Why do you mess with me?
'as if fickle and inconstant, as if not satisfied with your lodging and entertainment, and as seeking out for other and better, or as if burdensome where they were.'
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't have to explain anything thanks.
You asked for a passage where Christ directed people to go to private houses, you got a passage where Christ directed people to go to private houses, how you interpret it is your affair.
You will explain your interpretation and why the apostles of Christ were going from house to house in the book of Acts as is clearly reported, either your interp ...[text shortened]... he Bible is wrong when it reports that the apostles were going from house to house. Which is it?
23 Jan 14
Originally posted by Proper Knobthey are an understanding of the text that both harmonizes with the immediate context and the context of the Bible as a whole, to interpret the verse as an imperative command not to go from house to house is unwarranted and makes absolutely no sense.
Are these words in the Bible?
'as if fickle and inconstant, as if not satisfied with your lodging and entertainment, and as seeking out for other and better, or as if burdensome where they were.'
Originally posted by caissad4You'ld be amazed at what is out there. But then how would you know anything if you are not exposed to the truth, that there is a spiritual side of life.
A dozen exorcisms a year !! You are a certifiable lunatic ! 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI understand the JW's bible has left out many passages of the origoinal scripture. So it make it difficult to explain when there are limitations. And your concepts are not the same as others either.
I produced a Scripture from the psalms that you have failed to either understand or acknowledge which states that the meek will inherit the earth and reside forever upon it; whether i disappoint you is relevant to whom? It is meaningless to me whether your expectations are met or not. Not only that your doctrine of the eternal soul is anti christian ...[text shortened]... trine can be traced to paganism and is inherited from the Greeks; it is not a biblical teaching.
The average Christian would not accept anything i've said of the JW's being children of God just as much as they are. It is what is in the heart that matters. (i have to go to work, but will type later on this)
23 Jan 14
Originally posted by PudgenikWe have the most accurate translation of the Bible available to anyone on the planet, independently tested and verified by associate professor Jason BeDhun, we have lefty out nothing from the original texts that were not there in the first place.
I understand the JW's bible has left out many passages of the origoinal scripture. So it make it difficult to explain when there are limitations. And your concepts are not the same as others either.
The average Christian would not accept anything i've said of the JW's being children of God just as much as they are. It is what is in the heart that matters. (i have to go to work, but will type later on this)
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt is stupidity to think that in today's world when we have telephone, television, and internet that everybody must go from door to door to spread the gospel of Christ to all the world. Besides do you follow that command completely by also baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit? If so, wouldn't that be admitting belief in the Trinity?
We have the most accurate translation of the Bible available to anyone on the planet, independently tested and verified by associate professor Jason BeDhun, we have lefty out nothing from the original texts that were not there in the first place.
23 Jan 14
Originally posted by RJHindsFirst of all does the Bible states that Christ gave the disciples the command to go to private houses and that the apostles were found doing that as reported in the book of acts. This is important because the assertion was that there was no such precedent when clearly there is. What is more in order to teach someone you must spend time with that person and simply dumping information on them is not teaching is it. No one is claiming that the Christian has to limit his or her ministry solely to house to house in fact Paul had a custom of going to the market place and the synagogue. Your trinitarian quip will be ignored as unworthy of serious comment.
It is stupidity to think that in today's world when we have telephone, television, and internet that everybody must go from door to door to spread the gospel of Christ to all the world. Besides do you follow that command completely by also baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit? If so, wouldn't that be admitting belief in the Trinity?