Go back
Alleged

Alleged "Cult" Physicians Q&A

Spirituality

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
23 May 21
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

FMF, there is a long thread here which consists mostly of sayings of Eastern Religion and not much else. It was started and faithfully attended to by rookie54.

Have I EVER seen you make a comment over there on . . . that the thread starter should go start a blog if they don't want to discuss?

You've suggested me go blog many times. How is it that thread . . . escapes your equivalent suggestion to rookie54 for these years?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
23 May 21

@sonship said
You've suggested me go blog many times. How is thread . . . escape your equivalent suggestion to rookie54 for these years?
You have a particular ideology to propagate but your interpersonal wheels frequently fall off - emotionally and intellectually speaking - because you are unable to process dissent and discuss things with integrity. None of this applies to rookie64.

I suggest a blog might be a better bet for you and the propagation of your ideology. Then you could use this message board for genuine and honest engagement with people whose beliefs you do not share.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
23 May 21

@sonship said
I invited you to consult the webmaster to have my involvement terminated if I am doing something SO inappropriate that it should not be tolerated here.
Why would I want to have your "involvement terminated"? What on Earth are you on about?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
23 May 21
2 edits

@FMF

Maybe that is why some people don't want to discuss too much with you.
You like to react like they have no idea of what they are saying.

Phrases like "What are you on about ?" are designed to make those talking to you think of their comments as so completely out in left field, like we haven't realized what your words convey.

Before you talked about my behavior as being so very poor - integrity issues etc.
And I said and say again, if my behavior is so egregious, make a complaint and have me disciplined.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
Phrases like "What are you on about ?" are designed to make those talking to you think of their comments as so completely out in left field, like we haven't realized what your words convey.
I use phrases like "What are you on about ?" when I think you are making stuff up, resorting to a strawman, or when you use a non-sequitur for the purposes of evasion.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
24 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

You have a particular ideology to propagate but your interpersonal wheels frequently fall off - emotionally and intellectually speaking - because you are unable to process dissent and discuss things with integrity. None of this applies to rookie64.


I don't think that is the reason for the inconsistency.
I think the authority of God you count non-benigh.

A thousand koans and poems of mysticism don't bother you.
The judgment of God arouses fierce rationalization and argument here.


I suggest a blog might be a better bet for you and the propagation of your ideology. Then you could use this message board for genuine and honest engagement with people whose beliefs you do not share.


I don't usually consult atheists to coach and tutor me on where and how to talk to people about the gospel. Play the "ineffective Christian" card all you want.

I'm here.
I'm writing.
I have some more to write.
Sorry.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
A thousand koans and poems of mysticism don't bother you.
Why would they?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
I don't usually consult atheists to coach and tutor me on where and how to talk to people about the gospel. Play the "ineffective Christian" card all you want.
It's you who rather inadvertently played the "ineffective Christian" card, it was here [thread]188639[/b]

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
24 May 21
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
Why would they?
So you agree.
I thought you would.
No need to rail about "depraved" Zen masters compared to a Righteous Judge from whose infallible judgment one cannot escape and which has eternal consequences.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
24 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

I did not visit your example yet.
But I never claimed perfection.

So it would not be a shock to me whatever it is.

Do you stop playing chess because your scores are not in the 2500 range yet?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
@FMF

I did not visit your example yet.
But I never claimed perfection.

So it would not be a shock to me whatever it is.
It's a thread you started.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
A thousand koans and poems of mysticism don't bother you.
I don't have any objection to mysticism, or to belief in supernatural causality. Poems of mysticism don't bother me.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
No need to rail about "depraved" Zen masters compared to a Righteous Judge from whose infallible judgment one cannot escape and which has eternal consequences.
Which Zen masters do you believe are "depraved"?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
24 May 21

@sonship said
@FMF

You have a particular ideology to propagate but your interpersonal wheels frequently fall off - emotionally and intellectually speaking - because you are unable to process dissent and discuss things with integrity. None of this applies to rookie64.


I don't think that is the reason for the inconsistency.
There is no "inconsistency".

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
24 May 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
There is no "inconsistency".
Rather there is no consistency.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.