@fmf saidWhy on earth are you asking me that?
Which Zen masters do you believe are "depraved"?
@sonship saidBecause you said: "No need to rail about "depraved" Zen masters compared to a Righteous Judge from whose infallible judgment one cannot escape and which has eternal consequences." I haven't talked about "depraved" Zen masters. It's you. You're the one who is suddenly talking about "depraved" Zen masters. That's what I am referring to
Why on earth are you asking me that?
You've suggested me go blog many times. How is it that thread . . . escapes your equivalent suggestion to rookie54 for these years?
Its not so much the style but the content.
Rookie54's content doesn't bother you.
New Testament content does.
I think FMF's chief disagreement is not with style or conversation of my threads. That is just excuse for his reaction to content, content which he labels depraved ideology.
Someone show me a complaint from FMF where he retorted to rookie54 and the over 1300 posts over there - "If you don't want to talk go open a private blog." [not a quote]
24 May 21
@sonship saidBut rookie54 isn't propagating the most grotesquely and ludicrously evil ideology that the human imagination has ever come up with. You are. So my interaction with you is different from my interaction with him.
Someone show me a complaint from FMF where he retorted to rookie54 and the over 1300 posts over there - "If you don't want to talk go open a private blog." [not a quote]
@fmf saidI deduce from it that you have no such higher ground advantage to arrogantly act as if you are some exemplary kind of normal and standard user of the Forum.
And what do you deduce from the fact that you have critics and I have critics? What significance do you attach to the fact that we have that in common?
@FMF
Why do you think your question is interesting and worth my time to reply to?
Ask me if I care if my OP is up to your approval.