@ghost-of-a-duke saidSuzianne's numerous visceral attacks about me supposedly hounding and dehumanizing Grampy Bobby were here on the Spirituality Forum and were about my supposed behaviour here, where she was, where I was, and where you were. What you allegedly do for friends was not evident. I don't rate your memory, your judgement, or indeed your good faith to the same degree as I once did.
It's odd that you don't understand and immediately accept that the post was probably made in the GF, a forum you rarely go into (and which I clearly remember posting).
Maybe spread your legs a little and venture into other forums, if you want to stay on top of things.
Whatever banter you might have engaged in on the General Forum has nothing to do with what you did or didn't do on this forum where the accusations made against your friend were vile and incessant.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI didn't storm out of our group simply because we disagreed. My eyes have been opened.
All things you rated very highly until I started disagreeing with you.
Funny that.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhen Suzianne claimed on the Spirituality Forum that I had harassed Romans1009 so badly for disagreeing with me that he'd been pushed from the website by my relentless abuse ~ an accusation I drew your attention to ~ did you step up to rebut that on the er... the General Forum, then?
It's odd that you don't understand and immediately accept that the post was probably made in the GF
21 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes. I have read it. It's still there. You flounced out with telling questions pointedly ignored. It's there in the record of the conversation.
'Flounced out.' 'Stormed out.'
Go back and read the last post I made before leaving. Was it not not both measured and polite? Where is the flouncing, the storming?
@fmf said
I don't rate your memory, your judgement, or indeed your good faith to the same degree as I once did.
FMF: Have you not read any of the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of her posts aimed at me over the last few years? What is it you are claiming you would do for anyone you consider a friend, including me?
Ghost of a Duke: That was entirely reciprocal between the two of you.
This was an extraordinary claim. After me carefully not replying-in-kind to her stalking [often up to 90% of her posts in a given month addressed to me] and her unhinged, paranoid vituperative almost exclusively off-topic comments for years on end?
Like I say. What is one to make of your memory, your judgement, or indeed your good faith after a cop-out like that?
@secondson saidBefore this thread you would have never approached Ghost of a Duke for support with a scurrilous slander such as the one you proposed about me being in part responsible for another poster’s demise.
That's stupid. Ghost and I know where we stand relative to our beliefs, opinions and points of view. Your characterization of how we or I "see" ghost is flagrant posturing on your part trying to justify your lame brained perspective.
Since this latest fray ensured and especially this thread the weak in mind and in principle have seen an opportunity to score cheap internet points in the way to attempted to by leveraging Ghost of a Duke in the way they you did.
It was encouraging to see him dismiss you and your vile partisan inferences with the casual brush-off he gave you. Since then you have been running around the forum wetting yourself like an excited puppy who’s gotten away with pooing in the cat litter.
21 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou flounced out of that group in terribly bad mood due to your newly assumed righteous indignation about a certain poster’s behaviour being discussed in the way dozens of poster’s behaviour had been discussed in dozens of threads by all and including you! Pretending it didn’t happen if frankly embarrassing but of course your new found friends are not able to read it.
'Flounced out.' 'Stormed out.'
Go back and read the last post I made before leaving. Was it not not both measured and polite? Where is the flouncing, the storming?
@divegeester saidYou have my permission to copy my 'final post' here so we can judge its flounciness.
You flounced out of that group in terribly bad mood
I trust you to post it faithfully. (Obviously, edit out any names if I used them).
@fmf saidHeated posts were reciprocal between the two of you. Are you saying that wasn't the case?FMF: Have you not read any of the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of her posts aimed at me over the last few years? What is it you are claiming you would do for anyone you consider a friend, including me?
Ghost of a Duke: That was entirely reciprocal between the two of you.
This was an extraordinary claim. After me carefully not replying-in-kind to her sta ...[text shortened]... is one to make of your memory, your judgement, or indeed your good faith after a cop-out like that?
@fmf saidHaving known me pretty well for 5 years, that's a long time to be walking around with your eyes closed.
My eyes have been opened.
I have aptly demonstrated how I have defended friends who have not been present to defend themselves (including both Dive and yourself, in this forum and debates) but when two friends are arguing among themselves then it is not my place to intervene or take sides. (Nor should I be expected to). I think both Suzianne and yourself are strong enough to fight your own battles. (When both of you are present).
21 Jul 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy your final post?
You have my permission to copy my 'final post' here so we can judge its flounciness.
I trust you to post it faithfully. (Obviously, edit out any names if I used them).
You left in a bad mood, you were upset particularly with FMF over behaviour you yourself exhibited on a daily basis but suddenly you were upset about it because you had formed a new friend.
It was petulant, irrespective of whatever tone your words took.
You should have exercised some calm and sorted it out with you friend instead of leaving in a huff about it.