22 Nov 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you google life from nonliving matter, you will see it's on the brink of being done. Also, it's well known that plenty of organic molecules are found in space.
muhaha, if its been done over again and again we could produce life from non living matter - newsflash, ummm no it hasn't! you may wish to revise your statement.
22 Nov 10
2 edits
Originally posted by 667joei am very well aware of the first attempts to make amino acids in a primitive atmosphere in experiments by Stanley Miller in the nineteen fifties until the recent attempts to synthesise self replicating RNA, LIFE HAS NOT BEEN REPLICATED FROM NON LIVING MATTER, your statement is erroneous and deceptive, i don't need goggle to tell me that. You trust in the God of science is misplaced you have proven only one thing, your materialism is empty and devoid of wisdom, indeed, the God of science is ruining the earth, technology has depleted fishing stocks beyond repair, torn down forests for materialistic consumerism, unscrupulous industrialists church tons of contaminants into the atmosphere, yes yes, all hail the God of science, makes me want to puke! By the Way, taking your argument to space only changes the local, not the problem of producing life from non living matter!
If you google life from nonliving matter, you will see it's on the brink of being done. Also, it's well known that plenty of organic molecules are found in space.
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHere are a little of the wonderful things that science has brought us..And these are just a few of the many problems.
i am very well aware of the first attempts to make amino acids in a primitive atmosphere in experiments by Stanley Miller in the nineteen fifties until the recent attempts to synthesise self replicating RNA, LIFE HAS NOT BEEN REPLICATED FROM NON LIVING MATTER, your statement is erroneous and deceptive, i don't need goggle to tell me that. You trust ...[text shortened]... ment to space only changes the local, not the problem of producing life from non living matter!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_conflicts
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=affects+of+global+warming+on+oceans&fulltext=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_effects_of_pesticides
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by galveston75Are you anti-science? Most creationists try to claim that evolution is not 'true science' or not supported by science or in some way an error of science. I don't think I've met anyone who is anti-science in general.
Here are a little of the wonderful things that science has brought us..And these are just a few of the many problems.
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMost of the pollution is caused by Christians! Besides, your argument is a red herring. You have no proof whatever that an invisible man in the sky started life 99.5% of which has gone extinct.
i am very well aware of the first attempts to make amino acids in a primitive atmosphere in experiments by Stanley Miller in the nineteen fifties until the recent attempts to synthesise self replicating RNA, LIFE HAS NOT BEEN REPLICATED FROM NON LIVING MATTER, your statement is erroneous and deceptive, i don't need goggle to tell me that. You trust ...[text shortened]... ment to space only changes the local, not the problem of producing life from non living matter!
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by 667joeand clearly yours is also an act of faith that life originated from the God of mindless matter, its true that a person reflects the God they worship, the God of mindless matter, mmmm
Most of the pollution is caused by Christians! Besides, your argument is a red herring. You have no proof whatever that an invisible man in the sky started life 99.5% of which has gone extinct.
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by galveston75each and every one of these problems are the result of a spiritual deficiency, either greed, or mismanagement due to greed, a failure to see another's perspective, the application of social darwinist policies, all spiritual problems.
Here are a little of the wonderful things that science has brought us..And these are just a few of the many problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_conflicts
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bomb ...[text shortened]... warming+on+oceans&fulltext=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_effects_of_pesticides
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by 667joeThe short answer will not satisfy you, and the long answer is too long to post up here,...... so please google "Vedabase" and then type in the search box "The Munus of the present Universe" and this will give you a description of the method of populating the universe.
It's been done over and over again. The science is overwhelming. Tell me how you think you got here if not by evolution.
Theres other sources of information on this subject in Srimad Bhagavatam by Srila Prubhupada
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuIn other words, you are unwilling to just give us the answer in plain English.
The short answer will not satisfy you, and the long answer is too long to post up here,...... so please google "Vedabase" and then type in the search box "The Munus of the present Universe" and this will give you a description of the method of populating the universe.
Theres other sources of information on this subject in Srimad Bhagavatam by Srila Prubhupada
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by galveston75All of these are a result of politics and greed. Science can be used for good or bad. You cannot blame science itself.
Here are a little of the wonderful things that science has brought us..And these are just a few of the many problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_conflicts
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bomb ...[text shortened]... warming+on+oceans&fulltext=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_effects_of_pesticides
It is like blaming gravity if you fall and break your leg.
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by lauseyyes indeed, this is the point, the worlds problems have their basis in spiritual and moral deficiency! kids don't die of malnourishment because the earth does not produce enough food, its greed and corrupt economics and a mismanagement of the earth resources which is to blame, the problem is spiritual and therefore the solution must be spiritual as well!
All of these are a result of politics and greed. Science can be used for good or bad. You cannot blame science itself.
It is like blaming gravity if you fall and break your leg.
22 Nov 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuIts difficult to explain the creation of the universe in plain english, because there are many words you havent heard before. (its in advanced physics)
Its difficult to explain the creation of the universe in plain english, because there are many words you havent heard before. (its in Sanskrit)