basic logic of right and wrong

Is the stoning of gays universally morally right or not?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
At this point in time no.

So you subscribe to morals that change depending on the "point in time"?

Originally posted by @eladar
Wanting to have things your way is wrong so I'd say your examples are of children acting wrongly.

So if someone gets angry because they were deceived by a lie is a wrong response? What would be a more logical response?

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem

Surely some few are born with sociopathic tendencies...an innate lack of ability to bond with and care about other people?

I heard one story of a guy who got in a car wreck. Part of the brain got scraped on a jagged bit of the skull, and he lost his ability to care about others. Perhaps some are born this way due to birth defects?

Very interesting point! A brain physically or chemically damaged can easily become faulty, but these examples belong in a separate category and an entirely different topic.

I'm talking about undamaged brains freshly born to physically healthy children.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Are you prepared to truthfully state before your god that @bunnyknight is not one of your usernames?

Hey! Anyone even thinking about stealing my username will be spanked with a carrot!

Originally posted by @bunnyknight
Very interesting point! A brain physically or chemically damaged can easily become faulty, but these examples belong in a separate category and an entirely different topic.

I'm talking about undamaged brains freshly born to physically healthy children.

Faults, damage, this is what drives changes into the genome.

i think it is a normal meme that genius and insanity are linked.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
A reminder for those who can't follow a thread.

*Obviously increased intelligence doesn't guarantee a good moral outlook.

Okay. So what next? You are right, we know this (intelligence does not depend on morality nor vice-versa).

Originally posted by @dj2becker
At this point in time no.

Is the stoning of gays universally morally wrong or not?

What has “time” got to do with something that is a universal moral absolute?

Originally posted by @bunnyknight
Hey! Anyone even thinking about stealing my username will be spanked with a carrot!

Talk to the hand up hand up your arse.

Originally posted by @apathist
Okay. So what next? You are right, we know this (intelligence does not depend on morality nor vice-versa).

Next we examine the hypothesis that intelligence increases the likelihood of a good moral character. (If not degraded by negative life experiences or trauma).

Originally posted by @fmf
So you subscribe to morals that change depending on the "point in time"?

Nothing can be added or removed from the Bible, so no I doubt they will change.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Talk to the hand up hand up your arse.

That’s rich coming from FMFs puppet.

Originally posted by @bunnyknight
So if someone gets angry because they were deceived by a lie is a wrong response? What would be a more logical response?

Yes that is the wrong response.

Forgiveness is the proper response.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Nothing can be added or removed from the Bible, so no I doubt they will change.

Why not? It's been happening for years.

Is the stoning of gays universally morally right or not?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
At this point in time no.

Unlike this point in time, then, was the stoning of gays universally morally right at a point in time in the past?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
That’s rich coming from FMFs puppet.

Dodge noted