Go back
basic logic of right and wrong

basic logic of right and wrong

Spirituality

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121323
Clock
22 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
That’s rich coming from FMFs puppet.
What has “time” got to do with something that is a universal moral absolute?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
22 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If it’s simply ‘good’ according to your subjective opinion of ‘good’ then I can live with that. 🙂 If however an objective standard of good were to exist, it might worry me.
Do you not care if most (all) people subjectively believe you are a bad person?

You can rant all you like about objective truth.

But you are still a very misguided (I'm being generous) individual
and unlikeable soul.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
23 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @bunnyknight
Very interesting point! A brain physically or chemically damaged can easily become faulty, but these examples belong in a separate category and an entirely different topic.

I'm talking about undamaged brains freshly born to physically healthy children.
No one has complete control over threads here. Tangents are allowed.

I tend to think outside the box on issues, so you are not the first, nor the last, to experience a Big Dogg tangent.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
23 Nov 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @divegeester
What has “time” got to do with something that is a universal moral absolute?
1. Do you think Leviticus still applies today?

2. Were the instructions written in Leviticus optional at the time?

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121323
Clock
23 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
1. Do you think Leviticus still applies today?

2. Were the instructions written in Leviticus optional at the time?
Instead on answering a question with a question, why not answer the question that has been put to you and which you are now desperately dodging?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
23 Nov 17

Originally posted by @divegeester
Instead on answering a question with a question, why not answer the question that has been put to you and which you are now desperately dodging?
Instead on answering a question with a question, why not answer the questions that have been put to you and which you are now desperately dodging?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
23 Nov 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Do you not care if most (all) people subjectively believe you are a bad person?

You can rant all you like about objective truth.

But you are still a very misguided (I'm being generous) individual
and unlikeable soul.
If objective truth does not exist, your subjective opinions are meaningless to me.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
23 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If objective truth does not exist, your subjective opinions are meaningless to me.
Either you are trying to be smart or demonstrating that you are fool.
Which is it?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
23 Nov 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
Either you are trying to be smart or demonstrating that you are fool.
Which is it?
From my perspective, in the greater scheme of things, what people think about me doesn't really matter. What really matters is what God thinks.

bunnyknight
bunny knight

planet Earth

Joined
12 Dec 13
Moves
2917
Clock
23 Nov 17

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
No one has complete control over threads here. Tangents are allowed.

I tend to think outside the box on issues, so you are not the first, nor the last, to experience a Big Dogg tangent.
Actually I'm glad you brought up that subject, and thinking outside the box is very good. What I meant was that my examples did not include damaged brains, that's all.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121323
Clock
23 Nov 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @dj2becker
From my perspective, in the greater scheme of things, what people think about me doesn't really matter. What really matters is what God thinks.
Well what you are thought of in this forum and how much credence you are provided has nothing to do with your perspective, the greater scheme of things nor what god thinks. In here you are just another dishonest religious jerk with one tune and a broken whistle.

diver

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
121323
Clock
23 Nov 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Instead on answering a question with a question, why not answer the questions that have been put to you and which you are now desperately dodging?
I asked you a question first; it is forum etiquette to answer.

What’s the matter, are you so unable to defend your crappy indefensible position that you have to resort to this?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
23 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
From my perspective, in the greater scheme of things, what people think about me doesn't really matter. What really matters is what God thinks.
This attitude is very dangerous.
It is what drives Islamic suicide bombers.
No care for society - just doing god's work ...

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
24 Nov 17

Originally posted by @divegeester
Well what you are thought of in this forum and how much credence you are provided has nothing to do with your perspective, the greater scheme of things nor what god thinks. In here you are just another dishonest religious jerk with one tune and a broken whistle.
What exactly have I been dishonest about?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
24 Nov 17

Originally posted by @divegeester
What has “time” got to do with something that is a universal moral absolute?
Time is what separates the old covenant from the new.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.