@fmf saidYes, and it does remain a less than preferable thing as it is not an official marriage, but yes, it is acceptable and does not impact my communion with the body of Christ.
So "fornication" as you engage in it, is OK?
This exists for others as well. It's not only for me.
@fmf saidI did that two years ago, indeed, and you're still smarting.
Only because you endorsed him and picked him out as "the best".
This is the fourth time you've mentioned him.
Do you want to talk about someone who posted here a long time ago some more?
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidMentioning him is not "smarting". He's gone. He was a dreary creep. The website got rid of him. Mentioning him isn't talking about him; it's talking about you
I did that two years ago, indeed, and you're still smarting.
This is the fourth time you've mentioned him.
Do you want to talk about someone who posted here a long time ago some more?
@fmf saidAnd there's number five.
Mentioning him is not "smarting". He's gone. He was a dreary creep. The website got rid of him. Mentioning him isn't talking about him; it's talking about you
... Alright.
Would you like me to apologize for something?
Or would you like to tell everyone more about Romans and how he made you feel, and the significance of my statement?
Or do you want to talk about my sex life?
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidI don't want to know anything at all about your sex life but there are Christians who believe "fornication" is wrong and the work of "Satan" and so it is both a moral issue and it has something vaguely to do with this thread.
Or do you want to talk about my sex life?
@fmf saidRight, so, do you have more questions about it? You had a few.
I don't want to know anything at all about your sex life but there are Christians who believe "fornication" is wrong and the work of "Satan" and so it is both a moral issue and it has something vaguely to do with this thread.
Would you like to clear anything up?
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidAll comments about Romans1009 since he was banned from the site, have been and continue to be essentially about you and your judgement and your standards ~ and not about him.
Or would you like to tell everyone more about Romans and how he made you feel, and the significance of my statement?
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidYou mean about Christian beliefs regarding "fornication" and "Satan"?
Right, so, do you have more questions about it? You had a few.
Would you like to clear anything up?
@fmf saidAlright, that's the sixth time he has been mentioned.
All comments about Romans1009 since he was banned from the site, have been and continue to be essentially about you and your judgement and your standards ~ and not about him.
@fmf saidAs it pertains to my sex life, of course.
You mean about Christian beliefs regarding "fornication" and "Satan"?
In short, do you have anything more to mention about my sex life and marital status
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidAs for me, I don't care who you have sex with and I don't believe in "Satan".
As it pertains to my sex life, of course.
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidSeeing as you seemingly write dozens of posts a week about whether or not you approve of posting styles, and the use of words you don't like, and about forum 'standards', your endorsement of Romans1009 will probably continue to be mentioned dozens and dozens of times, perhaps every time you write an off-topic bit of attempted browbeating about how someone posts.
Alright, that's the sixth time he has been mentioned.
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidSo having previously answered “sure” ~ when I initially asked you if your fornication was influenced by satanic forces ~ you are now saying that your sexual behaviour is in fact not influenced by Satan because someone has given you permission to have sex outside of marriage?
My relationship and its sexual components predated my coming to Christ. When it began years ago, I was not religious at all, and indeed, contemplating joining even other religions.
I have since become a Christian.
In this process, I discussed my relationship status extensively, and because I am an adult in a relationship with a non-Christian, I was told that if I in ...[text shortened]... actually required a lot of soulsearching and an extended period of time before I made the decision.
And furthermore irrespective of clear scriptural instructions on the matter which is taken seriously and with great warnings in the Bible.
Perhaps you have a quote from Saint Horney the Bonerman of Randyland to support your disobedience....
@fmf saidAs this is the seventh time you've mentioned him since Pascha, it might be wise to just put it all out there and write a post about what it all means to you.
Seeing as you seemingly write dozens of posts a week about whether or not you approve of posting styles, and the use of words you don't like, and about forum 'standards', your endorsement of Romans1009 will probably continue to be mentioned dozens and dozens of times, perhaps every time you write an off-topic bit of attempted browbeating about how someone posts.
I can't actually address this in full because it's only relevant to you and Dive, and Lord only knows what you guys want to have addressed.
I think that you'll actually never be satisfied with anything I write on the topic and so it doesn't really matter. It's just something that is used to try to assert forum dominance.
Which is silly.
Did you know even Duchess mentioned you and Dive as famous allies over in Debates today?
Your status as digital blood Brothers is well known.
12 Jun 19
@philokalia saidI think more than that.
This is the second time that you have mentioned Romans since Easter 2019.
Your endorsement of a posters who’s entire RHP history has been completely eradicated from the website (by contrast the chess cheat Robbie Carrobie’s profile page and posts are still available) as the best poster on the forum was a moment of exquisite forum gold.