Originally posted by KellyJayDied for sinners who believe in him, not all sinners. God made some for noble purpse and others for common. Liberals who can't see sin show themselves to be common.
Who did Jesus die for? Its my understanding He died for sinners, don't cherry pick out of
that crowd, He died for them all.
You can come up with you own reasons for why Jesus did that.
Originally posted by EladarYou believe Jesus died for just a few sinners not all? This is not about who turns their lives over to God, but who Jesus died for!
Died for sinners who believe in him, not all sinners. God made some for noble purpse and others for common. Liberals who can't see sin show themselves to be common.
Originally posted by EladarI would be very interested in seeing reference to support your view that Jesus died for sinners who believe in him and not all sinners.
Died for sinners who believe in him, not all sinners. God made some for noble purpse and others for common. Liberals who can't see sin show themselves to be common.
Originally posted by EladarThat really is a silly response.
You have one which means nothing. A degree in heresy means absolutely nothing.
Just because I emerged from my degree as an atheist doesn't negate the content of the degree itself. All of my lecturers were Christian, and there were no modules I took over the 3 years that set out to promote heresy or belittle Christianity in any way.
Studying the bible in minute detail however did highlight inconsistencies, hardly surprising when one considers the many different authors, motivations and time scales. There is simply no getting away from that, and dismissing my degree as heresy is merely a cop out. Please don't respond to my posts if that is all you have to offer.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeThe school you graduated from negates it. I am sure it is liberal.
That really is a silly response.
Just because I emerged from my degree as an atheist doesn't negate the content of the degree itself. All of my lecturers were Christian, and there were no modules I took over the 3 years that set out to promote heresy or belittle Christianity in any way.
Studying the bible in minute detail however did highlight ...[text shortened]... s heresy is merely a cop out. Please don't respond to my posts if that is all you have to offer.
The fact you emrrged an atheist proves you don't understand the scriptures.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeAfter studying the Bible in the way you did, do you not feel any part of it could be 'true', despite the inconsistencies?
That really is a silly response.
Just because I emerged from my degree as an atheist doesn't negate the content of the degree itself. All of my lecturers were Christian, and there were no modules I took over the 3 years that set out to promote heresy or belittle Christianity in any way.
Studying the bible in minute detail however did highlight ...[text shortened]... s heresy is merely a cop out. Please don't respond to my posts if that is all you have to offer.
I have said to you in the past that your particular atheism interests me because of your degree. I struggle with the Bible myself, and that's the only reason for asking.
Originally posted by EladarNo. The university I attended was not liberal.
The school you graduated from negates it. I am sure it is liberal.
The fact you emrrged an atheist proves you don't understand the scriptures.
Clearly it is you who know nothing. (As you have repeatedly evidenced by your previous postings).
Originally posted by chaney3I enjoy reading the bible and I enjoyed studying the bible at university level.
After studying the Bible in the way you did, do you not feel any part of it could be 'true', despite the inconsistencies?
I have said to you in the past that your particular atheism interests me because of your degree. I struggle with the Bible myself, and that's the only reason for asking.
But, bottom line sir, I don't believe in God. How could i feel 'any part of it was true' when I have no belief that God himself exists. Not wishing to be flippant (and i know it is probably not a fair comparison) but I also enjoyed reading Lord of the Rings, despite not believing in the existence of elves. - My insight into the bible though is no less valid than someone who does believe in God, especially those who conveniently misinterpret the ancient texts for their own ends.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeDid you believe in God before attending the university?
I enjoy reading the bible and I enjoyed studying the bible at university level.
But, bottom line sir, I don't believe in God. How could i feel 'any part of it was true' when I have no belief that God himself exists. Not wishing to be flippant (and i know it is probably not a fair comparison) but I also enjoyed reading Lord of the Rings, despite no ...[text shortened]... eve in God, especially those who conveniently misinterpret the ancient texts for their own ends.
And only after vigorous study of the Bible became atheist?
Originally posted by chaney3No. I have always been an atheist. I have explored openly the 5 major religions to a deep level (Hinduism not so much) but none have eroded that atheism.
Did you believe in God before attending the university?
And only after vigorous study of the Bible became atheist?
Have a great Christmas.